These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

252 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7844509)

  • 1. Visual, orthographic, phonological, and lexical influences in reading.
    Massaro DW; Cohen MM
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1994 Dec; 20(6):1107-28. PubMed ID: 7844509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Visual phonology: the effects of orthographic consistency on different auditory word recognition tasks.
    Ziegler JC; Ferrand L; Montant M
    Mem Cognit; 2004 Jul; 32(5):732-41. PubMed ID: 15552350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Integration versus interactive activation: the joint influence of stimulus and context in perception.
    Massaro DW; Cohen MM
    Cogn Psychol; 1991 Oct; 23(4):558-614. PubMed ID: 1742982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [The influence of visualization of orthography on the recognition of written words].
    Mathey S
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2001 Mar; 55(1):1-23. PubMed ID: 11301725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The strong, the weak, and the first: The impact of phonological stress on processing of orthographic errors in silent reading.
    Kriukova O; Mani N
    Brain Res; 2016 Apr; 1636():208-218. PubMed ID: 26790350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Is the orthographic/phonological onset a single unit in reading aloud?
    Mousikou P; Coltheart M; Saunders S; Yen L
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2010 Feb; 36(1):175-94. PubMed ID: 20121303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Orthographic depth and the interaction of visual and auditory processing in word recognition.
    Frost R; Katz L
    Mem Cognit; 1989 May; 17(3):302-10. PubMed ID: 2725267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Orthographic and phonological computation in visual word recognition: evidence from backward masking in Hebrew.
    Frost R; Yogev O
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2001 Sep; 8(3):524-30. PubMed ID: 11700904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Orthographic, phonological, and articulatory contributions to masked letter and word priming.
    Bowers JS; Vigliocco G; Haan R
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1998 Dec; 24(6):1705-19. PubMed ID: 9861718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Examining the interactivity of lexical orthographic and phonological processing.
    Owen WJ; Borowsky R
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2003 Dec; 57(4):290-303. PubMed ID: 14710866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Do transposed-letter similarity effects occur at a prelexical phonological level?
    Perea M; Carreiras M
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2006 Sep; 59(9):1600-13. PubMed ID: 16873111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Visual lexical access is initially phonological: 2. Evidence from phonological priming by homophones and pseudohomophones.
    Lukatela G; Turvey MT
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 1994 Dec; 123(4):331-53. PubMed ID: 7996120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Reading isolated words: no evidence for automatic incorporation of the phonetic code.
    Brysbaert M; Praet C
    Psychol Res; 1992; 54(2):91-102. PubMed ID: 1620802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Independence of lexical context and phonological information in speech perception.
    Massaro DW; Oden GC
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1995 Jul; 21(4):1053-64. PubMed ID: 7673867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Time course analyses of orthographic and phonological priming effects in developing readers.
    Zeguers MH; Huizenga HM; van der Molen MW; Snellings P
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2018 Aug; 71(8):1672-1686. PubMed ID: 28644105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. From orthography to phonetics: ERP measures of grapheme-to-phoneme conversion mechanisms in reading.
    Proverbio AM; Vecchi L; Zani A
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2004 Mar; 16(2):301-17. PubMed ID: 15068599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Additive and interactive effects on response time distributions in visual word recognition.
    Yap MJ; Balota DA
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2007 Mar; 33(2):274-96. PubMed ID: 17352611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Lexical and sublexical processes in the perception of transposed-letter anagrams.
    Frankish C; Barnes L
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2008 Mar; 61(3):381-91. PubMed ID: 17935005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Vowel duration affects visual word identification: evidence that the mediating phonology is phonetically informed.
    Lukatela G; Eaton T; Sabadini L; Turvey MT
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2004 Feb; 30(1):151-62. PubMed ID: 14769074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Masked phonological priming effects in English: are they real? Do they matter?
    Rastle K; Brysbaert M
    Cogn Psychol; 2006 Sep; 53(2):97-145. PubMed ID: 16554045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.