These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

257 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7844762)

  • 1. Making a custom tray for elastomeric impression materials without a primary cast.
    Ansari IH
    J Prosthet Dent; 1994 Nov; 72(5):569-71. PubMed ID: 7844762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A laboratory study of dimensional changes for three elastomeric impression materials using custom and stock trays.
    Boulton JL; Gage JP; Vincent PF; Basford KE
    Aust Dent J; 1996 Dec; 41(6):398-404. PubMed ID: 9008997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effects of relief space and escape holes on pressure characteristics of maxillary edentulous impressions.
    Komiyama O; Saeki H; Kawara M; Kobayashi K; Otake S
    J Prosthet Dent; 2004 Jun; 91(6):570-6. PubMed ID: 15211300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Selective-pressure single impression procedure for tooth-mucosa-supported removable partial dentures.
    Dumbrigue HB; Esquivel JF
    J Prosthet Dent; 1998 Aug; 80(2):259-61. PubMed ID: 9710833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of elastomeric impression materials used in fixed prosthodontics.
    Ciesco JN; Malone WF; Sandrik JL; Mazur B
    J Prosthet Dent; 1981 Jan; 45(1):89-94. PubMed ID: 7007629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Computer aided design and 3-dimensional printing for the production of custom trays of maxillary edentulous jaws based on 3-dimensional scan of primary impression].
    Chen H; Zhao T; Wang Y; Sun YC
    Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2016 Oct; 48(5):900-904. PubMed ID: 27752178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Dimensional stability of elastomeric impression materials in custom-made and stock trays.
    Valderhaug J; Fløystrand F
    J Prosthet Dent; 1984 Oct; 52(4):514-7. PubMed ID: 6389833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A two-stage impression technique for distal-extension removable partial dentures.
    von Krammer R
    J Prosthet Dent; 1988 Aug; 60(2):199-201. PubMed ID: 3050037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. An effect of tray design and material retention on the linear dimensional changes in polysulfide impressions.
    Walters RA; Spurrier S
    J Prosthet Dent; 1990 Mar; 63(3):277-81. PubMed ID: 2407824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A clinical overview of removable prostheses: 2. Impression making for partial dentures.
    McCord JF; Grey NJ; Winstanley RB; Johnson A
    Dent Update; 2002 Nov; 29(9):422-7. PubMed ID: 12494557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Pressure generated on a simulated oral analog by impression materials in custom trays of different designs.
    Masri R; Driscoll CF; Burkhardt J; Von Fraunhofer A; Romberg E
    J Prosthodont; 2002 Sep; 11(3):155-60. PubMed ID: 12237795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Impression material thickness in stock and custom trays.
    Bomberg TJ; Hatch RA; Hoffman W
    J Prosthet Dent; 1985 Aug; 54(2):170-2. PubMed ID: 3903109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Impressions in removable partial dentures].
    Prapotnich R; Domken O
    Rev Belge Med Dent (1984); 2001; 56(3):204-15. PubMed ID: 16193853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Accuracy of open tray implant impressions: an in vitro comparison of stock versus custom trays.
    Burns J; Palmer R; Howe L; Wilson R
    J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Mar; 89(3):250-5. PubMed ID: 12644799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Predictable impression procedures for complete dentures.
    Felton DA; Cooper LF; Scurria MS
    Dent Clin North Am; 1996 Jan; 40(1):39-51. PubMed ID: 8635625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. An alternative impression technique for complete dentures.
    Yilmaz B; Özçelik TB
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Feb; 111(2):166-8. PubMed ID: 24286641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Accuracy of complete dental arch impressions and stone casts using a three-dimensional measurement system. Effects on accuracy of rubber impression materials and trays.
    Ishida K
    Dent Jpn (Tokyo); 1990; 27(1):73-9. PubMed ID: 2099294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Complete mucostatic impression: a new attempt.
    Bindhoo YA; Thirumurthy VR; Kurien A
    J Prosthodont; 2012 Apr; 21(3):209-14. PubMed ID: 22356157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Prosthetic rehabilitation for a patient with microstomia: a clinical report.
    Benetti R; Zupi A; Toffanin A
    J Prosthet Dent; 2004 Oct; 92(4):322-7. PubMed ID: 15507903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Dimensional accuracy of dental casts: influence of tray material, impression material, and time.
    Thongthammachat S; Moore BK; Barco MT; Hovijitra S; Brown DT; Andres CJ
    J Prosthodont; 2002 Jun; 11(2):98-108. PubMed ID: 12087547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.