These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

110 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7844763)

  • 1. Custom impression trays with a new hypoallergenic material.
    Milward PJ; Murphy WM
    J Prosthet Dent; 1994 Nov; 72(5):572-3. PubMed ID: 7844763
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A comparative study of inter-abutment distance of dies made from full arch dual-arch impression trays with those made from full arch stock trays: an in vitro study.
    Reddy JM; Prashanti E; Kumar GV; Suresh Sajjan MC; Mathew X
    Indian J Dent Res; 2009; 20(4):412-7. PubMed ID: 20139562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Stability of thermoplastic custom impression trays.
    Lambert RL
    Gen Dent; 1994; 42(5):460-2. PubMed ID: 7489881
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Impression techniques: clinical properties that matter.
    Nash RW
    Dent Today; 2014 Apr; 33(4):110, 112-3. PubMed ID: 24791295
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A method to make a preliminary impression of mobile teeth.
    Lee H; Park C
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Jul; 102(1):52-3. PubMed ID: 19573690
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Technique and materials for obtaining accurate impressions in 60 to 90 seconds.
    Werrin SR
    Dent Today; 2003 Mar; 22(3):86-9. PubMed ID: 12705017
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Fabricating a simple closure guide for the dual-arch impression technique.
    Keesee SM; Cameron SM; Lefler TB
    J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Apr; 85(4):418. PubMed ID: 11319543
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Accuracy of open tray implant impressions: an in vitro comparison of stock versus custom trays.
    Burns J; Palmer R; Howe L; Wilson R
    J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Mar; 89(3):250-5. PubMed ID: 12644799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Dimensional stability of elastomeric impression materials in custom-made and stock trays.
    Valderhaug J; Fløystrand F
    J Prosthet Dent; 1984 Oct; 52(4):514-7. PubMed ID: 6389833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Dimensional accuracy of dental casts: influence of tray material, impression material, and time.
    Thongthammachat S; Moore BK; Barco MT; Hovijitra S; Brown DT; Andres CJ
    J Prosthodont; 2002 Jun; 11(2):98-108. PubMed ID: 12087547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The corrected cast impression: an alternative technique.
    Walton JN
    Quintessence Int; 1993 Nov; 24(11):779-81. PubMed ID: 20830890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Effects of different tray types on the resulting impression].
    Biffar R; Bittner B
    Dtsch Zahnarztl Z; 1989 Aug; 44(8):624-7. PubMed ID: 2700730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. 3D-printed custom trays with a Gothic arch for centric relation recording and definitive impression making for complete dentures: A dental technique.
    Qu F; Du X; Liu WC
    J Prosthet Dent; 2019 Jan; 121(1):32-36. PubMed ID: 30006221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A practical three visit complete denture system.
    Ling BC
    Ann R Australas Coll Dent Surg; 2000 Oct; 15():66-8. PubMed ID: 11709981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A simple technique to control the heat generated during light polymerization of custom impression trays.
    Chung KH; Wadhwani C; Cagna DR
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Jan; 111(1):79-80. PubMed ID: 24161256
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The effect of impression volume and double-arch trays on the registration of maximum intercuspation.
    Hahn SM; Millstein PL; Kinnunen TH; Wright RF
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Dec; 102(6):362-7. PubMed ID: 19961994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The laminar impression technique.
    Schoenrock GA
    J Prosthet Dent; 1989 Oct; 62(4):392-5. PubMed ID: 2685238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Impression technique. Review of survey findings.
    LaMond GG
    Dent Today; 2002 Jul; 21(7):88-91. PubMed ID: 12242840
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Impression material thickness in stock and custom trays.
    Bomberg TJ; Hatch RA; Hoffman W
    J Prosthet Dent; 1985 Aug; 54(2):170-2. PubMed ID: 3903109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The 30th anniversary of the triple tray! Interview by Damon Adams.
    Werrin SR
    Dent Today; 2010 Jul; 29(7):104, 106-7. PubMed ID: 20687434
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.