145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7844922)
1. The health care stabilization fund after eighteen years.
Stratton WT
Kans Med; 1994 Nov; 95(11):240. PubMed ID: 7844922
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. The circle closes.
Stratton WT
J Kans Med Soc; 1984 Dec; 85(12):330-2, 354. PubMed ID: 6394676
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Defense of truth never rests in liability debate.
Palmisano DJ
Md Med; 2004; 5(2):52. PubMed ID: 15227954
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. The first step toward stopping the malpractice insurance crisis.
Sataloff J
Ear Nose Throat J; 2008 Sep; 87(9):492-4. PubMed ID: 18800316
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. A cold day for tort reform.
Buckley JW
Md Med; 2004; 5(2):6-7. PubMed ID: 15227942
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Malpractice crisis impedes safety.
Whisnant R
Minn Med; 2004 Apr; 87(4):14. PubMed ID: 15144154
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. An alternate proposal for compensating injuries occurring in the health care delivery system.
Wedekind CL
J Ky Med Assoc; 1987 Jun; 85(6):317-22. PubMed ID: 3611962
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Rein in runaway costs associated with malpractice insurance.
Belsky DH
J Am Osteopath Assoc; 2003 Jun; 103(6):263. PubMed ID: 12834097
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Medical tort reform: a novel approach.
Hancock CR
J Am Coll Radiol; 2006 Nov; 3(11):829-31. PubMed ID: 17412179
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Fund pays ten million: pursues nurse and her insurer.
Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1998 Apr; 38(11):1. PubMed ID: 10067626
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. A case of naive optimism?
Maizel SE
Md Med; 2004; 5(2):38-9. PubMed ID: 15227950
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Tort reform 2004. The legislative perspective.
Brown AG
Md Med; 2004; 5(2):34-6. PubMed ID: 15227949
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Tort reform 2004. The MedChi perspective.
Schwartz JA
Md Med; 2004; 5(2):28-9. PubMed ID: 15227946
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Tort reform 2004. The medical mutual perspective.
Murray D
Md Med; 2004; 5(2):32-3. PubMed ID: 15227948
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Tort reform 2004. The alliance perspective.
Larsen SB; Warden K
Md Med; 2004; 5(2):30-1. PubMed ID: 15227947
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Does someone have to die?
Cantor RE
N J Med; 2002 Dec; 99(12):41-2. PubMed ID: 12510573
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. The 2002 hard market for dental malpractice insurance.
Anzuoni SA
J Mass Dent Soc; 2003; 51(4):46-7. PubMed ID: 12677643
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Statutory caps: an involuntary contribution to the medical malpractice insurance crisis or a reasonable mechanism for obtaining affordable health care?
Chupkovich PJ
J Contemp Health Law Policy; 1993; 9():337-75. PubMed ID: 10126943
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Coordination of medical malpractice insurance benefits: circuits ponder who pays?
Margolis RE
Healthspan; 1993 Jan; 10(1):16-7. PubMed ID: 10124288
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Gov. Engler deserves recognition, respect for his strong stand on liability reform.
Hertz RH
Mich Med; 1992 Apr; 91(4):8. PubMed ID: 1614339
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
