These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7845767)

  • 21. Contribution of somesthetic cues to the perception of body orientation and subjective visual vertical.
    Trousselard M; Cian C; Nougier V; Pla S; Raphel C
    Percept Psychophys; 2003 Nov; 65(8):1179-87. PubMed ID: 14710953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The effects of background visual roll stimulation on postural and manual control and self-motion perception.
    Previc FH; Kenyon RV; Boer ER; Johnson BH
    Percept Psychophys; 1993 Jul; 54(1):93-107. PubMed ID: 8351192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Vection: the contributions of absolute and relative visual motion.
    Howard IP; Howard A
    Perception; 1994; 23(7):745-51. PubMed ID: 7845766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Contribution of somatosensory information to perception of the visual vertical with body tilt and rotating visual field.
    Yardley L
    Percept Psychophys; 1990 Aug; 48(2):131-4. PubMed ID: 2385486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Visually-induced reorientation illusions as a function of age.
    Howard IP; Jenkin HL; Hu G
    Aviat Space Environ Med; 2000 Sep; 71(9 Suppl):A87-91. PubMed ID: 10993316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Effect of stationary objects on illusory forward self-motion induced by a looming display.
    Ohmi M; Howard IP
    Perception; 1988; 17(1):5-11. PubMed ID: 3205670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Effects of peripheral circular contours on dynamic spatial orientation.
    Babler TG; Ebenholtz SM
    Percept Psychophys; 1989 Apr; 45(4):307-14. PubMed ID: 2710631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Body-tilt and visual verticality perception during multiple cycles of roll rotation.
    Vingerhoets RA; Medendorp WP; Van Gisbergen JA
    J Neurophysiol; 2008 May; 99(5):2264-80. PubMed ID: 18337369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The subjective vertical and the sense of self orientation during active body tilt.
    Van Beuzekom AD; Medendorp WP; Van Gisbergen JA
    Vision Res; 2001; 41(25-26):3229-42. PubMed ID: 11718769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Perceived motion in structure from motion: pointing responses to the axis of rotation.
    Pollick FE; Nishida S; Koike Y; Kawato M
    Percept Psychophys; 1994 Jul; 56(1):91-109. PubMed ID: 8084735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The effect of ocular torsional position on perception of the roll-tilt of visual stimuli.
    Wade SW; Curthoys IS
    Vision Res; 1997 Apr; 37(8):1071-8. PubMed ID: 9196725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The effect of head tilt on perception of self-orientation while in a greater than one G environment.
    Chelette TL; Martin EJ; Albery WB
    J Vestib Res; 1995; 5(1):1-17. PubMed ID: 7711943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Influences of visual pitch and visual yaw on visually perceived eye level (VPEL) and straight ahead (VPSA) for erect and rolled-to-horizontal observers.
    Li W; Dallal N; Matin L
    Vision Res; 2001 Oct; 41(22):2873-94. PubMed ID: 11701181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The gap between rod and frame influences the rod-and-frame effect with small and large inducing displays.
    Zoccolotti P; Antonucci G; Spinelli D
    Percept Psychophys; 1993 Jul; 54(1):14-9. PubMed ID: 8351184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Field dependence and body balance.
    Kitamura F; Matsunaga K
    Percept Mot Skills; 1990 Dec; 71(3 Pt 1):723-34. PubMed ID: 2293175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Perception of the vertical with a head-mounted visual frame during head tilt.
    Mars F; Vercher JL; Blouin J
    Ergonomics; 2004 Aug; 47(10):1116-30. PubMed ID: 15370867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Pitch body orientation influences the perception of self-motion direction induced by optic flow.
    Bourrelly A; Vercher JL; Bringoux L
    Neurosci Lett; 2010 Oct; 482(3):193-7. PubMed ID: 20647031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Apparent body tilt and postural aftereffect.
    Higashiyama A; Koga K
    Percept Psychophys; 1998 Feb; 60(2):331-47. PubMed ID: 9529916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. A tilted frame deceives the eye and the hand.
    Li W; Matin E; Bertz JW; Matin L
    J Vis; 2008 Dec; 8(16):18.1-16. PubMed ID: 19146284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Visual memory for moving scenes.
    DeLucia PR; Maldia MM
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2006 Feb; 59(2):340-60. PubMed ID: 16618638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.