These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

105 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7845774)

  • 1. The relationship between time of arrival of nontargets and their spatial location: evidence for asymmetries in visual attentional processing.
    Coyle K
    Perception; 1994; 23(7):849-56. PubMed ID: 7845774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The neural processing fate of singleton target and nontarget stimuli.
    Akyürek EG; Dinkelbach A; Schubö A
    Brain Res; 2010 Jan; 1307():115-33. PubMed ID: 19833112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Attention and nontarget effects in the location-cuing paradigm.
    Chastain G; Cheal M; Lyon D
    Percept Psychophys; 1996 Feb; 58(2):300-9. PubMed ID: 8838172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Spatial factors in visual attention: some compensatory effects of location and time of arrival of nontargets.
    Gathercole SE; Broadbent DE
    Perception; 1987; 16(4):433-43. PubMed ID: 3444724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effects of similarity, difficulty, and nontarget presentation on the time course of visual attention.
    Ward R; Duncan J; Shapiro K
    Percept Psychophys; 1997 May; 59(4):593-600. PubMed ID: 9158333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Size scaling and spatial factors in visual attention.
    Goolkasian P
    Am J Psychol; 1997; 110(3):397-415. PubMed ID: 9339537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Focal distraction: spatial shifts of attentional focus are not required for contingent capture.
    Ghorashi SM; Zuvic SM; Visser TA; Di Lollo V
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2003 Feb; 29(1):78-91. PubMed ID: 12669749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Perceptual integration of motion and form information: evidence of parallel-continuous processing.
    von Mühlenen A; Müller HJ
    Percept Psychophys; 2000 Apr; 62(3):517-31. PubMed ID: 10909242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Top-down and bottom-up attentional control: on the nature of interference from a salient distractor.
    Kim MS; Cave KR
    Percept Psychophys; 1999 Aug; 61(6):1009-23. PubMed ID: 10497423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Shifting visual attention and selecting motor responses: distinct attentional mechanisms.
    Pashler H
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1991 Nov; 17(4):1023-40. PubMed ID: 1837295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Involuntary attentional shifts due to orientation differences.
    Joseph JS; Optican LM
    Percept Psychophys; 1996 Jul; 58(5):651-65. PubMed ID: 8710445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The "beam of darkness": spreading of the attentional blink within and between objects.
    Conci M; Müller HJ
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 Nov; 71(8):1725-38. PubMed ID: 19933558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Modulation of backward pattern masking by focal visual attention.
    Vidnyánszky Z
    Acta Biol Hung; 2002; 53(1-2):221-7. PubMed ID: 12064773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Better to take one long or two quick looks? Independent processing of evidence from discrete visual presentations.
    Schwarz W; Kühn S
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2008 Dec; 34(6):1337-52. PubMed ID: 19045979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evidence for attentional processing in spatial localization.
    Adam JJ; Davelaar EJ; van der Gouw A; Willems P
    Psychol Res; 2008 Jul; 72(4):433-42. PubMed ID: 17899176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effects of contrast polarity in paracontrast masking.
    Kafaligönül H; Breitmeyer BG; Ogmen H
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 Oct; 71(7):1576-87. PubMed ID: 19801617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Retinal location and its effect on the spatial distribution of visual attention.
    Goolkasian P
    Am J Psychol; 1999; 112(2):187-214. PubMed ID: 10696275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Long-term repetition priming of briefly identified objects.
    Breuer AT; Masson ME; Cohen AL; Lindsay DS
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Mar; 35(2):487-98. PubMed ID: 19271861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The time course of attentional capture under dual-task conditions.
    Santangelo V; Botta F; Lupiáñez J; Spence C
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2011 Jan; 73(1):15-23. PubMed ID: 21258904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Bugs and faces in the two visual fields: the analytic/holistic processing dichotomy and task sequencing.
    Bradshaw JL; Sherlock D
    Cortex; 1982 Jul; 18(2):211-25. PubMed ID: 7128171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.