These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
173 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7846997)
1. Accuracy and morphologic aspects of pancreatic and biliary duct brushings. Layfield LJ; Wax TD; Lee JG; Cotton PB Acta Cytol; 1995; 39(1):11-8. PubMed ID: 7846997 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Pancreatic and bile duct brushing cytology in 1000 cases: review of findings and comparison of preparation methods. Volmar KE; Vollmer RT; Routbort MJ; Creager AJ Cancer; 2006 Aug; 108(4):231-8. PubMed ID: 16541448 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A comparison of routine cytology and fluorescence in situ hybridization for the detection of malignant bile duct strictures. Kipp BR; Stadheim LM; Halling SA; Pochron NL; Harmsen S; Nagorney DM; Sebo TJ; Therneau TM; Gores GJ; de Groen PC; Baron TH; Levy MJ; Halling KC; Roberts LR Am J Gastroenterol; 2004 Sep; 99(9):1675-81. PubMed ID: 15330900 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Diagnostic benefit of biliary brush cytology in cholangiocarcinoma in primary sclerosing cholangitis. Boberg KM; Jebsen P; Clausen OP; Foss A; Aabakken L; Schrumpf E J Hepatol; 2006 Oct; 45(4):568-74. PubMed ID: 16879890 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Brush cytology of the extrahepatic biliary tract: comparison of cytologic features of adenocarcinoma and benign biliary strictures. Cohen MB; Wittchow RJ; Johlin FC; Bottles K; Raab SS Mod Pathol; 1995 Jun; 8(5):498-502. PubMed ID: 7675767 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Prospective evaluation of brush cytology of biliary strictures during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Glasbrenner B; Ardan M; Boeck W; Preclik G; Möller P; Adler G Endoscopy; 1999 Nov; 31(9):712-7. PubMed ID: 10604612 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Beyond cytomorphology: expanding the diagnostic potential for biliary cytology. Chadwick BE Diagn Cytopathol; 2012 Jun; 40(6):536-41. PubMed ID: 22619128 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Brush cytology of the biliary tract: retrospective study of 278 cases with histopathologic correlation. Govil H; Reddy V; Kluskens L; Treaba D; Massarani-Wafai R; Selvaggi S; Gattuso P Diagn Cytopathol; 2002 May; 26(5):273-7. PubMed ID: 11992366 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Benign, dysplastic, or malignant--making sense of endoscopic bile duct brush cytology: results in 149 consecutive patients. Lee JG; Leung JW; Baillie J; Layfield LJ; Cotton PB Am J Gastroenterol; 1995 May; 90(5):722-6. PubMed ID: 7733076 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Routine brush cytology and fluorescence in situ hybridization for assessment of pancreatobiliary strictures. Smoczynski M; Jablonska A; Matyskiel A; Lakomy J; Dubowik M; Marek I; Biernat W; Limon J Gastrointest Endosc; 2012 Jan; 75(1):65-73. PubMed ID: 22078103 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Immunohistochemical labeling for the Dpc4 gene product is a specific marker for adenocarcinoma in biopsy specimens of the pancreas and bile duct. Tascilar M; Offerhaus GJ; Altink R; Argani P; Sohn TA; Yeo CJ; Cameron JL; Goggins M; Hruban RH; Wilentz RE Am J Clin Pathol; 2001 Dec; 116(6):831-7. PubMed ID: 11764071 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Usefulness of transpapillary bile duct brushing cytology and forceps biopsy for improved diagnosis in patients with biliary strictures. Kitajima Y; Ohara H; Nakazawa T; Ando T; Hayashi K; Takada H; Tanaka H; Ogawa K; Sano H; Togawa S; Naito I; Hirai M; Ueno K; Ban T; Miyabe K; Yamashita H; Yoshimura N; Akita S; Gotoh K; Joh T J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2007 Oct; 22(10):1615-20. PubMed ID: 17573833 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Efficacy of endoscopic wire guided biliary brushing in the evaluation of biliary strictures. Sachdev A; Duseja A; Bhalla A; Handa U; Sandhu BS; Gupta V; Kochhar S Trop Gastroenterol; 2003; 24(4):215-7. PubMed ID: 15164539 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Significance of atypia in pancreatic and bile duct brushings: follow-up analysis of the categories atypical and suspicious for malignancy. Chadwick BE; Layfield LJ; Witt BL; Schmidt RL; Cox RN; Adler DG Diagn Cytopathol; 2014 Apr; 42(4):285-91. PubMed ID: 24167030 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. How to improve the accuracy of diagnosis of malignant biliary strictures. Fogel EL; Sherman S Endoscopy; 1999 Nov; 31(9):758-60. PubMed ID: 10604622 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Endoscopic transpapillary biopsy for diagnosis of patients with pancreaticobiliary ductal strictures. Kubota Y; Takaoka M; Tani K; Ogura M; Kin H; Fujimura K; Mizuno T; Inoue K Am J Gastroenterol; 1993 Oct; 88(10):1700-4. PubMed ID: 8213710 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Primary sclerosing cholangitis as a cause of false positive bile duct brushing cytology: report of two cases. Layfield LJ; Cramer H Diagn Cytopathol; 2005 Feb; 32(2):119-24. PubMed ID: 15637668 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Brush cytology of ductal strictures during ERCP. Macken E; Drijkoningen M; Van Aken E; Van Steenbergen W Acta Gastroenterol Belg; 2000; 63(3):254-9. PubMed ID: 11189981 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Endoscopic retrograde brush cytology (ERBC) of the biliary and pancreatic ducts. Osnes M; Serck-Hanssen A; Myren J Scand J Gastroenterol; 1975; 10(8):829-31. PubMed ID: 1202615 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Molecular diagnostic testing as an adjunct to morphologic evaluation of pancreatic ductal system brushings: potential augmentation for diagnostic sensitivity. Willmore-Payne C; Volmar KE; Huening MA; Holden JA; Layfield LJ Diagn Cytopathol; 2007 Apr; 35(4):218-24. PubMed ID: 17351944 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]