BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

177 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7846997)

  • 1. Accuracy and morphologic aspects of pancreatic and biliary duct brushings.
    Layfield LJ; Wax TD; Lee JG; Cotton PB
    Acta Cytol; 1995; 39(1):11-8. PubMed ID: 7846997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Pancreatic and bile duct brushing cytology in 1000 cases: review of findings and comparison of preparation methods.
    Volmar KE; Vollmer RT; Routbort MJ; Creager AJ
    Cancer; 2006 Aug; 108(4):231-8. PubMed ID: 16541448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A comparison of routine cytology and fluorescence in situ hybridization for the detection of malignant bile duct strictures.
    Kipp BR; Stadheim LM; Halling SA; Pochron NL; Harmsen S; Nagorney DM; Sebo TJ; Therneau TM; Gores GJ; de Groen PC; Baron TH; Levy MJ; Halling KC; Roberts LR
    Am J Gastroenterol; 2004 Sep; 99(9):1675-81. PubMed ID: 15330900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Diagnostic benefit of biliary brush cytology in cholangiocarcinoma in primary sclerosing cholangitis.
    Boberg KM; Jebsen P; Clausen OP; Foss A; Aabakken L; Schrumpf E
    J Hepatol; 2006 Oct; 45(4):568-74. PubMed ID: 16879890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Brush cytology of the extrahepatic biliary tract: comparison of cytologic features of adenocarcinoma and benign biliary strictures.
    Cohen MB; Wittchow RJ; Johlin FC; Bottles K; Raab SS
    Mod Pathol; 1995 Jun; 8(5):498-502. PubMed ID: 7675767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Prospective evaluation of brush cytology of biliary strictures during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography.
    Glasbrenner B; Ardan M; Boeck W; Preclik G; Möller P; Adler G
    Endoscopy; 1999 Nov; 31(9):712-7. PubMed ID: 10604612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Beyond cytomorphology: expanding the diagnostic potential for biliary cytology.
    Chadwick BE
    Diagn Cytopathol; 2012 Jun; 40(6):536-41. PubMed ID: 22619128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Brush cytology of the biliary tract: retrospective study of 278 cases with histopathologic correlation.
    Govil H; Reddy V; Kluskens L; Treaba D; Massarani-Wafai R; Selvaggi S; Gattuso P
    Diagn Cytopathol; 2002 May; 26(5):273-7. PubMed ID: 11992366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Benign, dysplastic, or malignant--making sense of endoscopic bile duct brush cytology: results in 149 consecutive patients.
    Lee JG; Leung JW; Baillie J; Layfield LJ; Cotton PB
    Am J Gastroenterol; 1995 May; 90(5):722-6. PubMed ID: 7733076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Routine brush cytology and fluorescence in situ hybridization for assessment of pancreatobiliary strictures.
    Smoczynski M; Jablonska A; Matyskiel A; Lakomy J; Dubowik M; Marek I; Biernat W; Limon J
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2012 Jan; 75(1):65-73. PubMed ID: 22078103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Immunohistochemical labeling for the Dpc4 gene product is a specific marker for adenocarcinoma in biopsy specimens of the pancreas and bile duct.
    Tascilar M; Offerhaus GJ; Altink R; Argani P; Sohn TA; Yeo CJ; Cameron JL; Goggins M; Hruban RH; Wilentz RE
    Am J Clin Pathol; 2001 Dec; 116(6):831-7. PubMed ID: 11764071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Usefulness of transpapillary bile duct brushing cytology and forceps biopsy for improved diagnosis in patients with biliary strictures.
    Kitajima Y; Ohara H; Nakazawa T; Ando T; Hayashi K; Takada H; Tanaka H; Ogawa K; Sano H; Togawa S; Naito I; Hirai M; Ueno K; Ban T; Miyabe K; Yamashita H; Yoshimura N; Akita S; Gotoh K; Joh T
    J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2007 Oct; 22(10):1615-20. PubMed ID: 17573833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Efficacy of endoscopic wire guided biliary brushing in the evaluation of biliary strictures.
    Sachdev A; Duseja A; Bhalla A; Handa U; Sandhu BS; Gupta V; Kochhar S
    Trop Gastroenterol; 2003; 24(4):215-7. PubMed ID: 15164539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Significance of atypia in pancreatic and bile duct brushings: follow-up analysis of the categories atypical and suspicious for malignancy.
    Chadwick BE; Layfield LJ; Witt BL; Schmidt RL; Cox RN; Adler DG
    Diagn Cytopathol; 2014 Apr; 42(4):285-91. PubMed ID: 24167030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. How to improve the accuracy of diagnosis of malignant biliary strictures.
    Fogel EL; Sherman S
    Endoscopy; 1999 Nov; 31(9):758-60. PubMed ID: 10604622
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Endoscopic transpapillary biopsy for diagnosis of patients with pancreaticobiliary ductal strictures.
    Kubota Y; Takaoka M; Tani K; Ogura M; Kin H; Fujimura K; Mizuno T; Inoue K
    Am J Gastroenterol; 1993 Oct; 88(10):1700-4. PubMed ID: 8213710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Primary sclerosing cholangitis as a cause of false positive bile duct brushing cytology: report of two cases.
    Layfield LJ; Cramer H
    Diagn Cytopathol; 2005 Feb; 32(2):119-24. PubMed ID: 15637668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Brush cytology of ductal strictures during ERCP.
    Macken E; Drijkoningen M; Van Aken E; Van Steenbergen W
    Acta Gastroenterol Belg; 2000; 63(3):254-9. PubMed ID: 11189981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Endoscopic retrograde brush cytology (ERBC) of the biliary and pancreatic ducts.
    Osnes M; Serck-Hanssen A; Myren J
    Scand J Gastroenterol; 1975; 10(8):829-31. PubMed ID: 1202615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Molecular diagnostic testing as an adjunct to morphologic evaluation of pancreatic ductal system brushings: potential augmentation for diagnostic sensitivity.
    Willmore-Payne C; Volmar KE; Huening MA; Holden JA; Layfield LJ
    Diagn Cytopathol; 2007 Apr; 35(4):218-24. PubMed ID: 17351944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.