211 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7847006)
41. Fine needle aspiration biopsy cytology of pulmonary tumors.
Musiatowicz B; Dziecioł J; Sulkowska M; Polaków J; Baltaziak M
Rocz Akad Med Bialymst; 1997; 42 Suppl 1():309-13. PubMed ID: 9337548
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Endoscopic biopsy diagnosis of acute gastrointestinal graft-versus-host disease: rectosigmoid biopsies are more sensitive than upper gastrointestinal biopsies.
Ross WA; Ghosh S; Dekovich AA; Liu S; Ayers GD; Cleary KR; Lee JH; Couriel D
Am J Gastroenterol; 2008 Apr; 103(4):982-9. PubMed ID: 18028511
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. The impact of liquid-based oral cytology on the diagnosis of oral squamous dysplasia and carcinoma.
Navone R; Burlo P; Pich A; Pentenero M; Broccoletti R; Marsico A; Gandolfo S
Cytopathology; 2007 Dec; 18(6):356-60. PubMed ID: 18031448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Diagnostic value of endoscopic transampullary biopsy for malignant bile duct stricture.
Kositchaiwat S; Kositchaiwat C; Kanchanapitak A; Lerkpatanakit P; Tinnakornrasamee C
J Med Assoc Thai; 2000 Sep; 83(9):992-8. PubMed ID: 11075963
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Further experience with direct vision brushing cytology of malignant tumors of upper gastrointestinal tract histopathologic correlation with biopsy.
Prolla JC; Yoshii Y; Kirsner JB; Xavier RG
Acta Cytol; 1971; 15(4):375-8. PubMed ID: 5288342
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
46. The utility of positron emission tomography for the diagnosis and staging of recurrent esophageal cancer.
Flamen P; Lerut A; Van Cutsem E; Cambier JP; Maes A; De Wever W; Peeters M; De Leyn P; Van Raemdonck D; Mortelmans L
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2000 Dec; 120(6):1085-92. PubMed ID: 11088030
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Non-computer-assisted liquid-based cytology for diagnosis of oral squamous cell carcinoma.
Pérez-Sayáns M; Reboiras-López MD; Gayoso-Diz P; Seijas-Naya F; Antúnez-López JR; Gándara-Rey JM; García-García A
Biotech Histochem; 2012 Jan; 87(1):59-65. PubMed ID: 21526909
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Endoscopic "salvage" cytology in neoplasms metastatic to the upper gastrointestional tract.
Caos A; Olson N; Willman C; Gogel HK
Acta Cytol; 1986; 30(1):32-4. PubMed ID: 3004080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Prospective comparison of the value of brushings before and after biopsy in the endoscopic diagnosis of gastroesophageal malignancy.
Zargar SA; Khuroo MS; Jan GM; Mahajan R; Shah P
Acta Cytol; 1991; 35(5):549-52. PubMed ID: 1927197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Endobiliary brush cytology during percutaneous transhepatic cholangiodrainage in patients with obstructive jaundice.
Xing GS; Geng JC; Han XW; Dai JH; Wu CY
Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int; 2005 Feb; 4(1):98-103. PubMed ID: 15730930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Brush cytology in the diagnosis of upper gastrointestinal malignancy.
Hanson JT; Thoreson C; Morrissey JF
Gastrointest Endosc; 1980 May; 26(2):33-5. PubMed ID: 7390103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Combined endoscopic cytology and biopsies in the diagnosis of duodenal malignancy.
King AJ; McCabe J; Waldron M; Kerin MJ; McGuire M; Given HF
Br J Clin Pract; 1990 Jul; 44(7):264-5. PubMed ID: 2206822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Comparative evaluation of the nuclear matrix protein, fibronectin, urinary bladder cancer antigen and voided urine cytology in the detection of bladder tumors.
Eissa S; Swellam M; Sadek M; Mourad MS; El Ahmady O; Khalifa A
J Urol; 2002 Aug; 168(2):465-9. PubMed ID: 12131289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Evaluation of cytological morphologic criteria and AgNOR expression in male breast lesions.
Karakitsos P; Botsoli-Stergiou EM; Ioakim-Liossi A; Georgoulakis J; Markopoulos C; Gogas J; Kyrkou K
Cytopathology; 1998 Apr; 9(2):107-13. PubMed ID: 9577737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Comparison of bronchoalveolar lavage cytology and transbronchial biopsy in the diagnosis of carcinoma of lung.
Ahmed A; Ahmed S
J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad; 2004; 16(4):29-33. PubMed ID: 15762059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Diagnostic accuracy of fiberendoscopy in the detection of upper intestinal malignancy. A follow-up analysis.
Dekker W; Tytgat GN
Gastroenterology; 1977 Oct; 73(4 Pt 1):710-4. PubMed ID: 892375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. The role of cytology in the diagnosis of gastrointestinal cancer.
Taylor RS
J Kans Med Soc; 1977 Jul; 78(7):348-52. PubMed ID: 328799
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
58. Touch smear cytology for endoscopic diagnosis of gastric carcinoma.
Tamura K; Masuzawa M; Akiyama T; Fukui O
Am J Gastroenterol; 1977 May; 67(5):463-7. PubMed ID: 900110
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Endoscopic techniques in the diagnosis of upper gastrointestinal tract malignancies. A comparison.
Malhotra V; Puri R; Chinna RS; Chawla LS; Sabharwal BD
Acta Cytol; 1996; 40(5):929-32. PubMed ID: 8842168
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Comparison of ThinPrep UroCyte and cytospin slide preparations for gastrointestinal specimens: evaluation and retrospective performance review.
Smith GD; Chadwick BE; Adler DG; Bentz JS
Diagn Cytopathol; 2010 Dec; 38(12):902-12. PubMed ID: 21104738
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
