These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
194 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7847218)
1. Fat-suppressed MR of the orbit and cavernous sinus: comparison of fast spin-echo and conventional spin-echo. Mukherji SK; Tart RP; Fitzsimmons J; Belden C; McGorray S; Guy J; Mancuso AA AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 1994 Oct; 15(9):1707-14. PubMed ID: 7847218 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Combined fat- and water-suppressed MR imaging of orbital tumors. Jackson A; Sheppard S; Johnson AC; Annesley D; Laitt RD; Kassner A AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 1999; 20(10):1963-9. PubMed ID: 10588126 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Enhancement and demyelination of the intraorbital optic nerve. Fat suppression magnetic resonance imaging. Guy J; Mao J; Bidgood WD; Mancuso A; Quisling RG Ophthalmology; 1992 May; 99(5):713-9. PubMed ID: 1594216 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Hepatic cavernous hemangioma: appearance on T2-weighted fast spin-echo MR imaging with and without fat suppression. Soyer P; Dufresne AC; Somveille E; Scherrer A AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1997 Feb; 168(2):461-5. PubMed ID: 9016227 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. MR imaging of head and neck tumors: comparison of T1-weighted contrast-enhanced fat-suppressed images with conventional T2-weighted and fast spin-echo T2-weighted images. Ross MR; Schomer DF; Chappell P; Enzmann DR AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Jul; 163(1):173-8. PubMed ID: 8010208 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. T2-weighted MR imaging of the abdomen: fast spin-echo vs conventional spin-echo sequences. Catasca JV; Mirowitz SA AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Jan; 162(1):61-7. PubMed ID: 8273691 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. T2-weighted spin-echo MR imaging of the liver: breath-hold fast spin-echo versus non-breath-hold fast spin-echo images with and without fat suppression. Soyer P; Le Normand S; de Givry SC; Gueye C; Somveille E; Scherrer A AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1996 Mar; 166(3):593-7. PubMed ID: 8623633 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Intra- and paraorbital lesions: value of fat-suppression MR imaging with paramagnetic contrast enhancement. Tien RD; Chu PK; Hesselink JR; Szumowski J AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 1991; 12(2):245-53. PubMed ID: 1902021 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Prospective comparison of T2-weighted fast spin-echo, with and without fat suppression, and conventional spin-echo pulse sequences in the upper abdomen. Schwartz LH; Seltzer SE; Tempany CM; Silverman SG; Piwnica-Worms DR; Adams DF; Herman L; Herman LT; Hooshmand R Radiology; 1993 Nov; 189(2):411-6. PubMed ID: 8210368 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Fast spin-echo imaging of the neck: comparison with conventional spin-echo, utility of fat suppression, and evaluation of tissue contrast characteristics. Lewin JS; Curtin HD; Ross JS; Weissman JL; Obuchowski NA; Tkach JA AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 1994 Aug; 15(7):1351-7. PubMed ID: 7976949 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Fast spin-echo MR in the detection of vertebral metastases: comparison of three sequences. Jones KM; Schwartz RB; Mantello MT; Ahn SS; Khorasani R; Mukherji S; Oshio K; Mulkern RV AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 1994 Mar; 15(3):401-7. PubMed ID: 8197934 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Conspicuity of tumors of the head and neck on fat-suppressed MR images: T2-weighted fast-spin-echo versus contrast-enhanced T1-weighted conventional spin-echo sequences. Dubin MD; Teresi LM; Bradley WG; Jordan JE; Pema PJ; Goergen SK; Tam JK AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 May; 164(5):1213-21. PubMed ID: 7717234 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Fast spin-echo triple-echo Dixon: initial clinical experience with a novel pulse sequence for fat-suppressed T2-weighted abdominal MR imaging. Low RN; Ma J; Panchal N J Magn Reson Imaging; 2009 Sep; 30(3):569-77. PubMed ID: 19711403 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Differentiation between hepatic cavernous hemangioma and malignant tumor with T2-weighted MRI: comparison of fast spin-echo and breathhold fast spin-echo pulse sequences. Soyer P; Dufresne AC; Somveille E; Lenormand S; Scherrer A; Rymer R Clin Imaging; 1998; 22(3):200-10. PubMed ID: 9559233 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Optic neuritis and orbital lesions: lipid-suppressed chemical shift MR imaging. Lee DH; Simon JH; Szumowski J; Feasby TE; Karlik SJ; Fox AJ; Pelz DM Radiology; 1991 May; 179(2):543-6. PubMed ID: 2014308 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Fast multiplanar spoiled gradient-recalled imaging of the liver: pulse sequence optimization and comparison with spin-echo MR imaging. Low RN; Francis IR; Herfkens RJ; Jeffrey RB; Glazer GM; Foo TK; Shimakawa A; Pelc NJ AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1993 Mar; 160(3):501-9. PubMed ID: 8381572 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. T1-weighted fat-suppressed imaging of the pelvis with a dual-echo Dixon technique: initial clinical experience. Beddy P; Rangarajan RD; Kataoka M; Moyle P; Graves MJ; Sala E Radiology; 2011 Feb; 258(2):583-9. PubMed ID: 21079201 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. T2-weighted MR imaging of the upper part of the abdomen: should fat suppression be used routinely? Lu DS; Saini S; Hahn PF; Goldberg M; Lee MJ; Weissleder R; Gerard B; Halpern E; Cats A AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 May; 162(5):1095-100. PubMed ID: 8165989 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Surface coil magnetic resonance imaging of the orbit at 1.5T. Wilms G; Marchal G; Decrop E; van Hecke P; Baert A; Dralands G Rofo; 1988 Nov; 149(5):496-501. PubMed ID: 2848281 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [The MRT of the orbit: the value of T1-weighted frequency-selective fat saturation at 1.0 and 1.5 tesla]. Link TM; Reimer P; Rummeny EJ; Schuierer G; Grenzebach U; Peters PE Rofo; 1995 Nov; 163(5):406-10. PubMed ID: 8527754 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]