BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

371 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7848062)

  • 1. Comparison of the Syva Microtrak enzyme immunoassay and Abbott Chlamydiazyme in the detection of chlamydial infections in women.
    Olsen MA; Sambol AR; Bohnert VA
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1995 Feb; 119(2):153-6. PubMed ID: 7848062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Enzyme immunoassay (Chlamydiazyme) for the detection of chlamydial antigen in endocervical specimens.
    Srivasin V; Lim KB; Thirumoorthy T; Sng EH
    Singapore Med J; 1989 Oct; 30(5):449-50. PubMed ID: 2694373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Use of chlamydiazyme for the detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in genital infections.
    Monno R; De Vito D; Vena GA; Mosca A; Miragliotta G
    Microbiologica; 1987 Oct; 10(4):421-5. PubMed ID: 3320688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A comparison of nonculture-dependent methods for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis infections in pregnant women.
    Baselski VS; McNeeley SG; Ryan G; Robison M
    Obstet Gynecol; 1987 Jul; 70(1):47-52. PubMed ID: 3299179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Enzyme immunoassay for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis from the cervix.
    Amortegui AJ; Meyer MP
    Obstet Gynecol; 1985 Apr; 65(4):523-6. PubMed ID: 3885103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of direct immunofluorescent staining and an enzyme-linked immunoabsorbent assay for identifying Chlamydia trachomatis in cervical and urethral specimens.
    Wiesmeier E; Bruckner DA; Malotte CK; Downie A
    J Reprod Med; 1989 Aug; 34(8):517-9. PubMed ID: 2681749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis infection in endocervical specimens using direct immunofluorescence.
    Graber CD; Williamson O; Pike J; Valicenti J
    Obstet Gynecol; 1985 Nov; 66(5):727-30. PubMed ID: 3903585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis antigen with an enzyme immunoassay].
    Näher H; Hofmann H; Petzoldt D
    Hautarzt; 1986 Jan; 37(1):37-41. PubMed ID: 3512482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Diagnosis of Chlamydia trachomatis--culture or enzyme immunoassay? Norwegian multicenter study].
    Nordbø SA; Mehl A; Vik IS; Ragnhildstveit E
    Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 1991 Aug; 111(19):2413-6. PubMed ID: 1926077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of chlamydial culture with Chlamydiazyme assay during erythromycin PCE treatment of Chlamydia genital infections.
    Havlichek DH; Mauck C; Mummaw NL; Moorer G; Rajan SJ; Mushahwar IK
    Sex Transm Dis; 1990; 17(1):48-50. PubMed ID: 2406958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Impact of endocervical specimen quality on apparent prevalence of Chlamydia trachomatis infections diagnosed using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay method.
    Kellogg JA; Seiple JW; Klinedinst JL; Levisky JS
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1991 Dec; 115(12):1223-7. PubMed ID: 1722665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A nonculture test for identification of Chlamydia trachomatis.
    Amortegui AJ; Meyer MP
    J Reprod Med; 1985 Mar; 30(3 Suppl):279-83. PubMed ID: 3894657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Non-invasive detection of Chlamydia trachomatis genital infections in asymptomatic males and females by enzyme immunoassay (Chlamydiazyme).
    Adjei O; Lal V
    J Trop Med Hyg; 1994 Feb; 97(1):51-4. PubMed ID: 8107174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Direct fluorescent-antibody confirmation of chlamydial antigen below the detection threshold of the chlamydiazyme enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay.
    Kellogg JA; Seiple JW; Stroll ES
    J Clin Microbiol; 1993 Jun; 31(6):1646-7. PubMed ID: 8315010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. False positive results with the use of chlamydial antigen detection tests in the evaluation of suspected sexual abuse in children.
    Hammerschlag MR; Rettig PJ; Shields ME
    Pediatr Infect Dis J; 1988 Jan; 7(1):11-4. PubMed ID: 3277152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Confirmatory testing demonstrates that false-positive rates in the chlamydiazyme assay are influenced by gender and genital specimen type.
    Chernesky M; Jang D; Sellors J; Castriciano S; Pickard L; Luinstra K; Mahony J
    Sex Transm Dis; 1993; 20(6):301-6. PubMed ID: 8108751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of detection procedures for Chlamydia trachomatis, including enzyme immunoassays, in a mouse model of genital infection.
    Taylor-Robinson D; Tuffrey M
    J Med Microbiol; 1987 Sep; 24(2):169-73. PubMed ID: 2958630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Confirmation of the Syva MicroTrak enzyme immunoassay for chlamydia trachomatis by Syva Direct Fluorescent Antibody Test.
    Beebe JL; Masters H; Jungkind D; Heltzel DM; Weinberg A
    Sex Transm Dis; 1996; 23(6):465-70. PubMed ID: 8946630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of first-voided urine specimens with endocervical swab specimens for enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in women.
    Kellogg JA; Vanderhoff BT; Seiple JW; Hick ME
    Arch Fam Med; 1994 Aug; 3(8):672-5. PubMed ID: 7952252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis infection by direct immunofluorescence staining of genital secretion.
    Wiesmeier E; Bruckner D; Black M
    Obstet Gynecol; 1987 Mar; 69(3 Pt 1):347-9. PubMed ID: 3547210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 19.