These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
366 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7848062)
1. Comparison of the Syva Microtrak enzyme immunoassay and Abbott Chlamydiazyme in the detection of chlamydial infections in women. Olsen MA; Sambol AR; Bohnert VA Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1995 Feb; 119(2):153-6. PubMed ID: 7848062 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Enzyme immunoassay (Chlamydiazyme) for the detection of chlamydial antigen in endocervical specimens. Srivasin V; Lim KB; Thirumoorthy T; Sng EH Singapore Med J; 1989 Oct; 30(5):449-50. PubMed ID: 2694373 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Use of chlamydiazyme for the detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in genital infections. Monno R; De Vito D; Vena GA; Mosca A; Miragliotta G Microbiologica; 1987 Oct; 10(4):421-5. PubMed ID: 3320688 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A comparison of nonculture-dependent methods for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis infections in pregnant women. Baselski VS; McNeeley SG; Ryan G; Robison M Obstet Gynecol; 1987 Jul; 70(1):47-52. PubMed ID: 3299179 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Enzyme immunoassay for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis from the cervix. Amortegui AJ; Meyer MP Obstet Gynecol; 1985 Apr; 65(4):523-6. PubMed ID: 3885103 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of direct immunofluorescent staining and an enzyme-linked immunoabsorbent assay for identifying Chlamydia trachomatis in cervical and urethral specimens. Wiesmeier E; Bruckner DA; Malotte CK; Downie A J Reprod Med; 1989 Aug; 34(8):517-9. PubMed ID: 2681749 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis infection in endocervical specimens using direct immunofluorescence. Graber CD; Williamson O; Pike J; Valicenti J Obstet Gynecol; 1985 Nov; 66(5):727-30. PubMed ID: 3903585 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis antigen with an enzyme immunoassay]. Näher H; Hofmann H; Petzoldt D Hautarzt; 1986 Jan; 37(1):37-41. PubMed ID: 3512482 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Diagnosis of Chlamydia trachomatis--culture or enzyme immunoassay? Norwegian multicenter study]. Nordbø SA; Mehl A; Vik IS; Ragnhildstveit E Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 1991 Aug; 111(19):2413-6. PubMed ID: 1926077 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of chlamydial culture with Chlamydiazyme assay during erythromycin PCE treatment of Chlamydia genital infections. Havlichek DH; Mauck C; Mummaw NL; Moorer G; Rajan SJ; Mushahwar IK Sex Transm Dis; 1990; 17(1):48-50. PubMed ID: 2406958 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Impact of endocervical specimen quality on apparent prevalence of Chlamydia trachomatis infections diagnosed using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay method. Kellogg JA; Seiple JW; Klinedinst JL; Levisky JS Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1991 Dec; 115(12):1223-7. PubMed ID: 1722665 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A nonculture test for identification of Chlamydia trachomatis. Amortegui AJ; Meyer MP J Reprod Med; 1985 Mar; 30(3 Suppl):279-83. PubMed ID: 3894657 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Non-invasive detection of Chlamydia trachomatis genital infections in asymptomatic males and females by enzyme immunoassay (Chlamydiazyme). Adjei O; Lal V J Trop Med Hyg; 1994 Feb; 97(1):51-4. PubMed ID: 8107174 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Direct fluorescent-antibody confirmation of chlamydial antigen below the detection threshold of the chlamydiazyme enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Kellogg JA; Seiple JW; Stroll ES J Clin Microbiol; 1993 Jun; 31(6):1646-7. PubMed ID: 8315010 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. False positive results with the use of chlamydial antigen detection tests in the evaluation of suspected sexual abuse in children. Hammerschlag MR; Rettig PJ; Shields ME Pediatr Infect Dis J; 1988 Jan; 7(1):11-4. PubMed ID: 3277152 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Confirmatory testing demonstrates that false-positive rates in the chlamydiazyme assay are influenced by gender and genital specimen type. Chernesky M; Jang D; Sellors J; Castriciano S; Pickard L; Luinstra K; Mahony J Sex Transm Dis; 1993; 20(6):301-6. PubMed ID: 8108751 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of detection procedures for Chlamydia trachomatis, including enzyme immunoassays, in a mouse model of genital infection. Taylor-Robinson D; Tuffrey M J Med Microbiol; 1987 Sep; 24(2):169-73. PubMed ID: 2958630 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Confirmation of the Syva MicroTrak enzyme immunoassay for chlamydia trachomatis by Syva Direct Fluorescent Antibody Test. Beebe JL; Masters H; Jungkind D; Heltzel DM; Weinberg A Sex Transm Dis; 1996; 23(6):465-70. PubMed ID: 8946630 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of first-voided urine specimens with endocervical swab specimens for enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in women. Kellogg JA; Vanderhoff BT; Seiple JW; Hick ME Arch Fam Med; 1994 Aug; 3(8):672-5. PubMed ID: 7952252 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis infection by direct immunofluorescence staining of genital secretion. Wiesmeier E; Bruckner D; Black M Obstet Gynecol; 1987 Mar; 69(3 Pt 1):347-9. PubMed ID: 3547210 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]