371 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7848062)
21. Enzyme immunoassay and direct immunofluorescence for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis antigen in male first-void urine.
Domeika MA; Bassiri M; Mårdh PA
Acta Derm Venereol; 1994 Jul; 74(4):323-6. PubMed ID: 7976101
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. [Comparison of immunofluorescence, enzyme immunoassay and cell culture for the diagnosis of Chlamydia trachomatis in urogenital infections].
Martínez A; Pinto E; Gaggero A; Arroyave R
Rev Med Chil; 1991 Feb; 119(2):164-8. PubMed ID: 1824159
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Limited value of two widely used enzyme immunoassays for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in women.
Thomas BJ; MacLeod EJ; Hay PE; Horner PJ; Taylor-Robinson D
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis; 1994 Aug; 13(8):651-5. PubMed ID: 7813495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Comparison of a polymer conjugate-enhanced enzyme immunoassay to ligase chain reaction for diagnosis of Chlamydia trachomatis in endocervical swabs.
Chernesky M; Jang D; Copes D; Patel J; Petrich A; Biers K; Sproston A; Kapala J
J Clin Microbiol; 2001 Jun; 39(6):2306-7. PubMed ID: 11376077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Comparative study of culture, direct immunofluorescent antibody test and enzyme immunoassay for the diagnosis of urogenital infections caused by Chlamydia trachomatis.
Dhar R; Lastimoza J; Dhar M; al-Akkad K; Chugh TD
APMIS Suppl; 1988; 3():35-9. PubMed ID: 3052536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Head-to-head evaluation of five chlamydia tests relative to a quality-assured culture standard.
Newhall WJ; Johnson RE; DeLisle S; Fine D; Hadgu A; Matsuda B; Osmond D; Campbell J; Stamm WE
J Clin Microbiol; 1999 Mar; 37(3):681-5. PubMed ID: 9986831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Comparison of the Syva MicroTrak enzyme immunoassay and Gen-Probe PACE 2 with cell culture for diagnosis of cervical Chlamydia trachomatis infection in a high-prevalence female population.
Clarke LM; Sierra MF; Daidone BJ; Lopez N; Covino JM; McCormack WM
J Clin Microbiol; 1993 Apr; 31(4):968-71. PubMed ID: 7681852
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Evaluation of three immunoassays for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in urine specimens from asymptomatic males.
Leonardi GP; Seitz M; Edstrom R; Cruz J; Costello P; Szabo K
J Clin Microbiol; 1992 Nov; 30(11):2793-6. PubMed ID: 1452648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Chlamydia trachomatis antigen detection by Chlamydiazyme combined with Chlamydia Blocking Reagent verification.
Zeeberg B; Thelin I; Schalén C
Int J STD AIDS; 1992; 3(5):355-9. PubMed ID: 1391063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis: comparison of agar-gel precipitin test and enzyme immunoassay.
Irokanulo EA; Akueshi CO; Makinde AA
Med Lab Sci; 1991 Apr; 48(2):118-21. PubMed ID: 1943537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. A comparison of urine sample to urethral swab for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in asymptomatic young men using two enzyme immunoassays.
Jensen IP
Sex Transm Dis; 1992; 19(3):165-9. PubMed ID: 1523533
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis antigens by enzyme immunoassay and immunofluorescence in genital specimens from symptomatic and asymptomatic men and women.
Chernesky MA; Mahony JB; Castriciano S; Mores M; Stewart IO; Landis SJ; Seidelman W; Sargeant EJ; Leman C
J Infect Dis; 1986 Jul; 154(1):141-8. PubMed ID: 3519787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. [Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in various pathological products. Comparison between direct IF-Chlamydiazyme and cultured cells].
Rouhan D; Le Noc P
Ann Biol Clin (Paris); 1987; 45(2):160-4. PubMed ID: 3304034
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Use of PCR and direct immunofluorescence microscopy for confirmation of results obtained by Syva MicroTrak Chlamydia enzyme immunoassay.
Ostergaard L; Møller JK
J Clin Microbiol; 1995 Oct; 33(10):2620-3. PubMed ID: 8567894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Evaluation of a direct fluorescent antibody test for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in endocervical specimens. Brief report.
Dereli D; Ertem E; Serter D; Yüce K
APMIS; 1991 Oct; 99(10):961-4. PubMed ID: 1930969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Enzyme-linked immunoabsorbent assays in the detection of Chlamydia trachomatis: how valid are they?
Weismeier E; Bruckner DA; Malotte CK; Manduke L
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis; 1988 Apr; 9(4):219-23. PubMed ID: 3180707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. [Chlamydia diagnosis in clinical practice. Chlamydia trachomatis EIA and direct immunofluorescence (MikroTak) in comparison with cell culture].
Gelzer D; Cathomas G; Bienz K; Rohrbach M; Viollier E; Rufli T
Schweiz Med Wochenschr; 1988 Feb; 118(7):223-6. PubMed ID: 3282301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in genitourinary tract specimens using an automated enzyme-linked fluorescent immunoassay.
Gun-Munro J; Mahony J; Lyn P; Luinstra K; Smaill F; Richardson H
Sex Transm Dis; 1996; 23(2):115-9. PubMed ID: 8919737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. A comparison of culture, direct fluorescent antibody test, and a quantitative indirect immunoperoxidase assay for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in pregnant women.
Osborne NG; Hecht Y; Gorsline J; Forbes BA; Morgenstern F; Winkelman J
Obstet Gynecol; 1988 Mar; 71(3 Pt 1):412-5. PubMed ID: 3279354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Culture, ELISA and immunofluorescence tests for the diagnosis of conjunctivitis caused by Chlamydia trachomatis in neonates and adults.
Stenberg K; Herrmann B; Dannevig L; Elbagir AN; Mårdh PA
APMIS; 1990 Jun; 98(6):514-20. PubMed ID: 2200446
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
