These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7848225)

  • 1. Prediction of caesarean section from ultrasound and clinical assessment of fetal size.
    Stock A; Ming WW; Rogers M; Chang AM
    Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 1994 Aug; 34(4):393-8. PubMed ID: 7848225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Regression formula for estimation of fetal weight with use of abdominal circumference and femur length: a prospective study.
    Ferrero A; Maggi E; Giancotti A; Torcia F; Pachì A
    J Ultrasound Med; 1994 Nov; 13(11):823-33. PubMed ID: 7837327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Clinical and sonographic parameters at 37 weeks' gestation for predicting the risk of primary Cesarean delivery in nulliparous women.
    Kim SN; Park KH; Jung HJ; Hong JS; Shin DM; Kang WS
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2010 Oct; 36(4):486-92. PubMed ID: 20586108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The prognostic value of fetal ultrasonography before induction of labour.
    Saunders N; Amis S; Marsh M
    Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1992 Nov; 99(11):903-6. PubMed ID: 1450140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of fundal height measurement and sonographically measured fetal abdominal circumference in the prediction of high and low birth weight at term.
    Kayem G; Grangé G; Bréart G; Goffinet F
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2009 Nov; 34(5):566-71. PubMed ID: 19582801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of fetal weight estimation formulas with and without head measurements.
    Warsof SL; Wolf P; Coulehan J; Queenan JT
    Obstet Gynecol; 1986 Apr; 67(4):569-73. PubMed ID: 3515257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Fetal biometry in different ethnic groups.
    Jacquemyn Y; Sys SU; Verdonk P
    Early Hum Dev; 2000 Jan; 57(1):1-13. PubMed ID: 10690707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Blinded ultrasound fetal biometry at 36 weeks and risk of emergency Cesarean delivery in a prospective cohort study of low-risk nulliparous women.
    Sovio U; Smith GCS
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Jul; 52(1):78-86. PubMed ID: 28452133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Prediction of cesarean delivery in the term nulliparous woman: results from the prospective, multicenter Genesis study.
    Burke N; Burke G; Breathnach F; McAuliffe F; Morrison JJ; Turner M; Dornan S; Higgins JR; Cotter A; Geary M; McParland P; Daly S; Cody F; Dicker P; Tully E; Malone FD;
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Jun; 216(6):598.e1-598.e11. PubMed ID: 28213060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Fetal weight estimation formulas with head, abdominal, femur, and thigh circumference measurements.
    Vintzileos AM; Campbell WA; Rodis JF; Bors-Koefoed R; Nochimson DJ
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1987 Aug; 157(2):410-4. PubMed ID: 3618691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Screening efficacy of the subcutaneous tissue width/femur length ratio for fetal macrosomia in the non-diabetic pregnancy.
    Rotmensch S; Celentano C; Liberati M; Malinger G; Sadan O; Bellati U; Glezerman M
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 1999 May; 13(5):340-4. PubMed ID: 10380299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Correctly identifying the macrosomic fetus: improving ultrasonography-based prediction.
    Sokol RJ; Chik L; Dombrowski MP; Zador IE
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2000 Jun; 182(6):1489-95. PubMed ID: 10871470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Femur-sparing pattern of abnormal fetal growth in pregnant women from New York City after maternal Zika virus infection.
    Walker CL; Merriam AA; Ohuma EO; Dighe MK; Gale M; Rajagopal L; Papageorghiou AT; Gyamfi-Bannerman C; Adams Waldorf KM
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Aug; 219(2):187.e1-187.e20. PubMed ID: 29738748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Is ultrasound measured fetal biometry predictive of intrapartum caesarean section for failure to progress?
    Yang JM; Hyett JA; Mcgeechan K; Phipps H; de Vries BS
    Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2018 Dec; 58(6):620-628. PubMed ID: 29355895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Prediction of delivery mode with transperineal ultrasound in women with prolonged first stage of labor.
    Torkildsen EA; Salvesen KÅ; Eggebø TM
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2011 Jun; 37(6):702-8. PubMed ID: 21308837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Ultrasonic measurements of fetal thigh soft tissue thickness in the estimation of fetal weight].
    Han Y; Lin H; Liu Y
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 1998 May; 33(5):277-9. PubMed ID: 10682438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Prediction of estimated fetal weight in extremely low birth weight neonates (500-1000 g).
    Medchill MT; Peterson CM; Kreinick C; Garbaciak J
    Obstet Gynecol; 1991 Aug; 78(2):286-90. PubMed ID: 2067777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Ultrasound and clinical predictors for Caesarean delivery after labour induction at term.
    Tan PC; Suguna S; Vallikkannu N; Hassan J
    Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2006 Dec; 46(6):505-9. PubMed ID: 17116055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Use of femur length in estimation of fetal weight.
    Hill LM; Breckle R; Gehrking WC; O'Brien PC
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1985 Aug; 152(7 Pt 1):847-52. PubMed ID: 3895952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Sonographic estimation of fetal weight at term: a proposal of a predictive score of a weight more than 4500 g].
    Kraiem J; Chiha N; Bouden S; Ounaissa F; Falfoul A
    Tunis Med; 2004 Jun; 82(6):526-30. PubMed ID: 15517951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.