180 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7848391)
1. Direction of catheter insertion and incidence of paresthesias and failure rate in continuous epidural anesthesia: a comparison of cephalad and caudad catheter insertion.
Muñoz HR; Dagnino JA; Allende M; Bugedo GJ; Montes JM; Cherres OG
Reg Anesth; 1993; 18(6):331-4. PubMed ID: 7848391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Advancing an epidural catheter 10 cm then retracting it 5 cm is no more effective than advancing it 5 cm.
Cartagena R; Gaiser RR
J Clin Anesth; 2005 Nov; 17(7):528-30. PubMed ID: 16297752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Predistention of the epidural space before catheter insertion reduces the incidence of intravascular epidural catheter insertion.
Evron S; Gladkov V; Sessler DI; Khazin V; Sadan O; Boaz M; Ezri T
Anesth Analg; 2007 Aug; 105(2):460-4. PubMed ID: 17646506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Epidural catheter direction and local anesthetic dose.
Tiso RL; Thomas PS; Macadaeg K
Reg Anesth; 1993; 18(5):308-11. PubMed ID: 8268121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Anesthetic effect of epidural anesthesia with cephalad or caudad catheterization for ankle surgery or hemorrhoidectomy.
Chou WY; Hsu CJ; Cheng JT; Yang LC; Lin CR; Chia YY; Yu SW; Tan PH
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand; 2005 Mar; 49(3):406-10. PubMed ID: 15752410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Direction of catheter insertion and the incidence of paresthesia during continuous epidural anesthesia in the elderly patients.
Kim JH; Lee JS; Kim DY
Korean J Anesthesiol; 2013 May; 64(5):443-7. PubMed ID: 23741568
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Local infiltration of epinephrine-containing lidocaine with bicarbonate reduces superficial bleeding and pain during labor epidural catheter insertion: a randomized trial.
Carvalho B; Fuller A; Brummel C; Cohen SE
Int J Obstet Anesth; 2007 Apr; 16(2):116-21. PubMed ID: 17276670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The effect of epidural needle type on postdural puncture headache: a randomized trial.
Morley-Forster PK; Singh S; Angle P; Littleford J; Currin M; Halpern SH
Can J Anaesth; 2006 Jun; 53(6):572-8. PubMed ID: 16738291
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Response to catheter insertion and incidence of paresthesias and failure rate in continuous epidural anesthesia.
Redick LF
Reg Anesth; 1994; 19(4):295-6. PubMed ID: 7947438
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. The effect of injection of two vs 10 mL saline on the subsequent spread and quality of epidural analgesia in parturients.
Siddik-Sayyid SM; Taha SK; Aouad MT; Daaboul DG; Deeb PG; El Khatib MF; Baraka AS
J Clin Anesth; 2006 Dec; 18(8):575-9. PubMed ID: 17175425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [The direction and the position of epidural catheter tips inserted 5 cm or 7 cm cephalad did not differ].
Kawagoe I; Tajima K; Kanai M; Mitsuhata H
Masui; 2010 Sep; 59(9):1171-7. PubMed ID: 20857677
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The effects of needle bevel orientation during epidural catheter insertion in laboring parturients.
Richardson MG; Wissler RN
Anesth Analg; 1999 Feb; 88(2):352-6. PubMed ID: 9972755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Comparison of double-segment technique with single-space technique for cesarean section using combined spinal epidural anesthesia].
Takahashi R; Yamada K; Yoshiyama T; Nitta S; Hamatani K
Masui; 1999 Jan; 48(1):57-61. PubMed ID: 10036891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Continuous spinal anesthesia versus continuous epidural anesthesia in surgery of the lower extremities. A prospective randomized study].
Kashanipour A; Strasser K; Klimscha W; Taslimi R; Aloy A; Semsroth M
Reg Anaesth; 1991 Aug; 14(5):83-7. PubMed ID: 1822599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluation of two different epidural catheters in clinical practice. narrowing down the incidence of paresthesia!
Bouman EA; Gramke HF; Wetzel N; Vanderbroeck TH; Bruinsma R; Theunissen M; Kerkkamp HE; Marcus MA
Acta Anaesthesiol Belg; 2007; 58(2):101-5. PubMed ID: 17710897
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Obstetrical peridural anesthesia with bupivacaine and buprenorphine. A randomized double-blind study in comparison with untreated controls].
Lehmann KA; Stern S; Breuker KH
Anaesthesist; 1992 Jul; 41(7):414-22. PubMed ID: 1497132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Continuous infusion epidural analgesia during labor: a randomized, double-blind comparison of 0.0625% bupivacaine/0.0002% fentanyl versus 0.125% bupivacaine.
Chestnut DH; Owen CL; Bates JN; Ostman LG; Choi WW; Geiger MW
Anesthesiology; 1988 May; 68(5):754-9. PubMed ID: 3285732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A randomized, double-masked, multicenter comparison of the safety of continuous intrathecal labor analgesia using a 28-gauge catheter versus continuous epidural labor analgesia.
Arkoosh VA; Palmer CM; Yun EM; Sharma SK; Bates JN; Wissler RN; Buxbaum JL; Nogami WM; Gracely EJ
Anesthesiology; 2008 Feb; 108(2):286-98. PubMed ID: 18212574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Lumbar epidural catheter insertion: the midline vs. the paramedian approach.
Leeda M; Stienstra R; Arbous MS; Dahan A; Th Veering B; Burm AG; Van Kleef JW
Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2005 Nov; 22(11):839-42. PubMed ID: 16225718
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A randomized trial of maximum cephalad sensory blockade with single-shot spinal compared with combined spinal-epidural techniques for cesarean delivery.
Horstman DJ; Riley ET; Carvalho B
Anesth Analg; 2009 Jan; 108(1):240-5. PubMed ID: 19095857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
