These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7849878)
1. Explanation for false-positive urine cultures obtained by bag technique. Schlager TA; Hendley JO; Dudley SM; Hayden GF; Lohr JA Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med; 1995 Feb; 149(2):170-3. PubMed ID: 7849878 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Explanation for false-positive urine cultures obtained by bag technique. Robson WL; Leung AK Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med; 1995 Sep; 149(9):1042; author reply 1042-3. PubMed ID: 7655595 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Explanation for false-positive urine cultures obtained by bag technique. Fleiss PM Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med; 1995 Sep; 149(9):1041-2. PubMed ID: 7655594 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Effect of periurethral colonization on the risk of urinary tract infection in healthy girls after their first urinary tract infection. Schlager TA; Hendley JO; Lohr JA; Whittam TS Pediatr Infect Dis J; 1993 Dec; 12(12):988-93. PubMed ID: 8108226 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effect of circumcision status on periurethral bacterial flora during the first year of life. Wiswell TE; Miller GM; Gelston HM; Jones SK; Clemmings AF J Pediatr; 1988 Sep; 113(3):442-6. PubMed ID: 3411387 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Is bag urine culture useful in monitoring urinary tract infection in infants? Li PS; Ma LC; Wong SN J Paediatr Child Health; 2002 Aug; 38(4):377-81. PubMed ID: 12174000 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Choice of urine collection methods for the diagnosis of urinary tract infection in young, febrile infants. Schroeder AR; Newman TB; Wasserman RC; Finch SA; Pantell RH Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med; 2005 Oct; 159(10):915-22. PubMed ID: 16203935 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Moving from bag to catheter for urine collection in non-toilet-trained children suspected of having urinary tract infection: a paired comparison of urine cultures. Etoubleau C; Reveret M; Brouet D; Badier I; Brosset P; Fourcade L; Bahans C; Garnier F; Blanc P; Guigonis V J Pediatr; 2009 Jun; 154(6):803-6. PubMed ID: 19375715 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A comparative study on bacterial cultures of urine samples obtained by clean-void technique versus urethral catheterization. Lau AY; Wong SN; Yip KT; Fong KW; Li SP; Que TL Acta Paediatr; 2007 Mar; 96(3):432-6. PubMed ID: 17407472 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparative periurethral bacteriology of uncircumcised and circumcised males. Serour F; Samra Z; Kushel Z; Gorenstein A; Dan M Genitourin Med; 1997 Aug; 73(4):288-90. PubMed ID: 9389952 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The reliability of midstream urine culture from circumcised male infants. Amir J; Ginzburg M; Straussberg R; Varsano I Am J Dis Child; 1993 Sep; 147(9):969-70. PubMed ID: 8362814 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Correlation of periurethral bacterial flora with bacteriuria and urinary tract infection in children with neurogenic bladder receiving intermittent catheterization. Schlager TA; Hendley JO; Wilson RA; Simon V; Whittam TS Clin Infect Dis; 1999 Feb; 28(2):346-50. PubMed ID: 10064254 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The effect of circumcision status on periurethral and glanular bacterial flora. Günşar C; Kurutepe S; Alparslan O; Yilmaz O; Dağlar Z; Sencan A; Genç A; Taneli C; Mir E Urol Int; 2004; 72(3):212-5. PubMed ID: 15084764 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Do antibiotic prophylaxis and/or circumcision change periurethral uropathogen colonization and urinary tract infection rates in boys with VUR? Gücük A; Burgu B; Gökçe İ; Mermerkaya M; Soygür T J Pediatr Urol; 2013 Dec; 9(6 Pt B):1131-6. PubMed ID: 23721792 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Does circumcision alter the periurethral uropathogenic bacterial flora. Laway MA; Wani ML; Patnaik R; Kakru D; Ismail S; Shera AH; Shiekh KA Afr J Paediatr Surg; 2012; 9(2):109-12. PubMed ID: 22878757 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluation of suprapubic bladder aspiration for detection of group B streptococcal antigen by latex agglutination in neonatal urine. Palmer AL; Leos NK; Hall M; Jackson GL; Sánchez PJ Am J Perinatol; 1996 May; 13(4):235-9. PubMed ID: 8724726 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A Cross-sectional Pilot Cohort Study Comparing Standard Urine Collection to the Peezy Midstream Device for Research Studies Involving Women. Southworth E; Hochstedler B; Price TK; Joyce C; Wolfe AJ; Mueller ER Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2019; 25(2):e28-e33. PubMed ID: 30807432 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Suprapubic bladder aspiration versus urethral catheterization in ill infants: success, efficiency and complication rates. Pollack CV; Pollack ES; Andrew ME Ann Emerg Med; 1994 Feb; 23(2):225-30. PubMed ID: 8304603 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Pain in infants who are younger than 2 months during suprapubic aspiration and transurethral bladder catheterization: a randomized, controlled study. Kozer E; Rosenbloom E; Goldman D; Lavy G; Rosenfeld N; Goldman M Pediatrics; 2006 Jul; 118(1):e51-6. PubMed ID: 16818537 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Is the clean-catch midstream void procedure necessary for obtaining urine culture specimens from men? Lipsky BA; Inui TS; Plorde JJ; Berger RE Am J Med; 1984 Feb; 76(2):257-62. PubMed ID: 6695949 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]