These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7850943)
1. Cost of initial therapy in the Electrophysiological Study Versus ECG Monitoring trial (ESVEM). Omoigui NA; Marcus FI; Mason JW; Hahn EA; Hartz VL; Hlatky MA Circulation; 1995 Feb; 91(4):1070-6. PubMed ID: 7850943 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Implications of the Electrophysiologic Study versus Electrocardiographic Monitoring trial for controlling ventricular tachycardia and fibrillation. Reiffel JA Am J Cardiol; 1996 Aug; 78(4A):34-40. PubMed ID: 8780327 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Influence of Holter monitor and electrophysiologic study methods and efficacy criteria on the outcome of patients with ventricular tachycardia and ventricular fibrillation in the ESVEM trial. Reiffel JA; Reiter MJ; Freedman RA; Mann D; Huang SK; Hahn E; Hartz V; Mason J; Prog Cardiovasc Dis; 1996; 38(5):359-70. PubMed ID: 8604440 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparative efficacy of sotalol and class I antiarrhythmic agents in patients with ventricular tachycardia or fibrillation: results of the Electrophysiology Study Versus Electrocardiographic Monitoring (ESVEM) Trial. Klein RC Eur Heart J; 1993 Nov; 14 Suppl H():78-84. PubMed ID: 8293756 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A summary and assessment of the findings and conclusions of the ESVEM trial. Mason JW; Marcus FI; Bigger JT; Lazzara R; Reiffel JA; Reiter MJ; Mann D Prog Cardiovasc Dis; 1996; 38(5):347-58. PubMed ID: 8604439 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Results of Holter ECG guided therapy for ventricular arrhythmias: the ESVEM trial. Lazzara R Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1994 Mar; 17(3 Pt 2):473-7. PubMed ID: 7513876 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Contemporary clinical trials in ventricular tachycardia and fibrillation: implications of ESVEM, CASCADE, and CASH for clinical management. Anderson JL J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 1995 Oct; 6(10 Pt 2):880-6. PubMed ID: 8548109 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Electrophysiologic Study versus Electrocardiographic Monitoring (ESVEM): a critical appraisal. Prystowsky EN Control Clin Trials; 1996 Jun; 17(3 Suppl):28S-36S. PubMed ID: 8877265 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Determinants of predicted efficacy of antiarrhythmic drugs in the electrophysiologic study versus electrocardiographic monitoring trial. The ESVEM Investigators. Circulation; 1993 Feb; 87(2):323-9. PubMed ID: 8425281 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Predictors of arrhythmic death and cardiac arrest in the ESVEM trial. Electrophysiologic Study Versus Electromagnetic Monitoring. Caruso AC; Marcus FI; Hahn EA; Hartz VL; Mason JW Circulation; 1997 Sep; 96(6):1888-92. PubMed ID: 9323077 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Insights into the Electrophysiology Study Versus Electrocardiographic Monitoring Trial: its programmed stimulation protocol may introduce bias when assessing long-term antiarrhythmic drug therapy. Biblo LA; Carlson MD; Waldo AL J Am Coll Cardiol; 1995 Jun; 25(7):1601-4. PubMed ID: 7759711 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Long-term cost-effectiveness of alternative management strategies for patients with life-threatening ventricular arrhythmias. Electrophysiologic Study versus Electrocardiographic Monitoring (ESVEM) Investigators. Hlatky MA; Boothroyd DB; Johnstone IM; Marcus FI; Hahn E; Hartz V; Mason JW J Clin Epidemiol; 1997 Feb; 50(2):185-93. PubMed ID: 9120512 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Significance and incidence of concordance of drug efficacy predictions by Holter monitoring and electrophysiological study in the ESVEM Trial. Electrophysiologic Study Versus Electrocardiographic Monitoring. Reiter MJ; Mann DE; Reiffel JE; Hahn E; Hartz V Circulation; 1995 Apr; 91(7):1988-95. PubMed ID: 7895357 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Reproducibility of drug efficacy predictions by Holter monitoring in the electrophysiologic study versus electrocardiographic monitoring (ESVEM) trial. ESVEM Investigators. Reiter MJ; Karagounis LA; Mann DE; Reiffel JA; Hahn E; Hartz V Am J Cardiol; 1997 Feb; 79(3):315-22. PubMed ID: 9036751 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The ESVEM trial: impact on treatment of ventricular tachyarrhythmias. Electrophysiologic Study Versus Electrocardiographic Monitoring. Reiter MJ Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1997 Feb; 20(2 Pt 2):468-77. PubMed ID: 9058850 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Cost and efficacy analysis in the ESVEM trial: implications for diagnosis and therapy for ventricular tachyarrhythmias. Hlatky MA Prog Cardiovasc Dis; 1996; 38(5):371-6. PubMed ID: 8604441 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Electrocardiographic predictors in the ESVEM trial: unsustained ventricular tachycardia, heart period variability, and the signal-averaged electrocardiogram. Anderson KP; Bigger JT; Freedman RA Prog Cardiovasc Dis; 1996; 38(6):463-88. PubMed ID: 8638028 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The ESVEM trial. Electrophysiologic Study Versus Electrocardiographic Monitoring for selection of antiarrhythmic therapy of ventricular tachyarrhythmias. The ESVEM Investigators. Circulation; 1989 Jun; 79(6):1354-60. PubMed ID: 2655967 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Interpretation of the results of the Electrophysiologic Study Versus Electrocardiographic Monitoring (ESVEM) study: electrocardiographic monitoring advocates' view. d'Avila A; Fenelon G; Nellens P; Brugada P Coron Artery Dis; 1994 Aug; 5(8):677-81. PubMed ID: 8000620 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]