BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

265 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7850959)

  • 1. Comparison of valvular resistance, stroke work loss, and Gorlin valve area for quantification of aortic stenosis. An in vitro study in a pulsatile aortic flow model.
    Voelker W; Reul H; Nienhaus G; Stelzer T; Schmitz B; Steegers A; Karsch KR
    Circulation; 1995 Feb; 91(4):1196-204. PubMed ID: 7850959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Flow dependence of measures of aortic stenosis severity during exercise.
    Burwash IG; Pearlman AS; Kraft CD; Miyake-Hull C; Healy NL; Otto CM
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 1994 Nov; 24(5):1342-50. PubMed ID: 7930259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Physiological basis of flow dependence of Gorlin formula valve area in aortic stenosis: analysis using an hydraulic model of pulsatile flow.
    Rifkin RD
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2000 Nov; 9(6):740-51. PubMed ID: 11128779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Simultaneous determination of aortic valve area by the Gorlin formula and by transesophageal echocardiography under different transvalvular flow conditions. Evidence that anatomic aortic valve area does not change with variations in flow in aortic stenosis.
    Tardif JC; Rodrigues AG; Hardy JF; Leclerc Y; Petitclerc R; Mongrain R; Mercier LA
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 1997 May; 29(6):1296-302. PubMed ID: 9137227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Dependence of Gorlin formula and continuity equation valve areas on transvalvular volume flow rate in valvular aortic stenosis.
    Burwash IG; Thomas DD; Sadahiro M; Pearlman AS; Verrier ED; Thomas R; Kraft CD; Otto CM
    Circulation; 1994 Feb; 89(2):827-35. PubMed ID: 8313572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effects of dobutamine on Gorlin and continuity equation valve areas and valve resistance in valvular aortic stenosis.
    Casale PN; Palacios IF; Abascal VM; Harrell L; Davidoff R; Weyman AE; Fifer MA
    Am J Cardiol; 1992 Nov; 70(13):1175-9. PubMed ID: 1414942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Hemodynamic assessment of patients with low-flow, low-gradient valvular aortic stenosis.
    Blitz LR; Herrmann HC
    Am J Cardiol; 1996 Sep; 78(6):657-61. PubMed ID: 8831400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Aortic valve area discrepancy by Gorlin equation and Doppler echocardiography continuity equation: relationship to flow in patients with valvular aortic stenosis.
    Burwash IG; Dickinson A; Teskey RJ; Tam JW; Chan KL
    Can J Cardiol; 2000 Aug; 16(8):985-92. PubMed ID: 10978934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Ventricular stroke work loss: validation of a method of quantifying the severity of aortic stenosis and derivation of an orifice formula.
    Sprigings DC; Chambers JB; Cochrane T; Allen J; Jackson G
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 1990 Dec; 16(7):1608-14. PubMed ID: 2254546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Hemodynamic resistance as a measure of functional impairment in aortic valvular stenosis.
    Ford LE; Feldman T; Chiu YC; Carroll JD
    Circ Res; 1990 Jan; 66(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 2295132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Modified gorlin equation for the diagnosis of mixed aortic valve pathology.
    Scotten LN; Walker DK; Dutton JW
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2002 May; 11(3):360-8; discussion 368. PubMed ID: 12056728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Changes in valvular resistance, power dissipation and myocardial reserve with aortic valvuloplasty.
    Feldman T; Ford LE; Chiu YC; Carroll JD
    J Heart Valve Dis; 1992 Sep; 1(1):55-64. PubMed ID: 1341224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Value and limitations of aortic valve resistance with particular consideration of low flow-low gradient aortic stenosis: an in vitro study.
    Mascherbauer J; Schima H; Rosenhek R; Czerny M; Maurer G; Baumgartner H
    Eur Heart J; 2004 May; 25(9):787-93. PubMed ID: 15120890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Three-dimensional surface area of the aortic valve orifice by three-dimensional echocardiography: clinical validation of a novel index for assessment of aortic stenosis.
    Ge S; Warner JG; Abraham TP; Kon ND; Brooker RF; Nomeir AM; Fowle KM; Burgess P; Kitzman DW
    Am Heart J; 1998 Dec; 136(6):1042-50. PubMed ID: 9842018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Hemodynamic stability of valve area, valve resistance, and stroke work loss in aortic stenosis: a comparative analysis.
    Burwash IG; Hay KM; Chan KL
    J Am Soc Echocardiogr; 2002 Aug; 15(8):814-22. PubMed ID: 12174351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Orifice variability of the stenotic aortic valve: evaluation before and after balloon aortic valvuloplasty.
    Paulus WJ; Sys SU; Heyndrickx GR; Andries E
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 1991 May; 17(6):1263-9. PubMed ID: 2016443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Hydraulic estimation of stenotic orifice area: a correction of the Gorlin formula.
    Cannon SR; Richards KL; Crawford M
    Circulation; 1985 Jun; 71(6):1170-8. PubMed ID: 3995711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Aortic valve resistance as an adjunct to the Gorlin formula in assessing the severity of aortic stenosis in symptomatic patients.
    Cannon JD; Zile MR; Crawford FA; Carabello BA
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 1992 Dec; 20(7):1517-23. PubMed ID: 1452925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Normal and stenotic human aortic valve opening: in vitro assessment of orifice area changes with flow.
    Montarello JK; Perakis AC; Rosenthal E; Boyd EG; Yates AK; Deverall PB; Sowton E; Curry PV
    Eur Heart J; 1990 Jun; 11(6):484-91. PubMed ID: 2351157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effect of exercise on indices of valvular aortic stenosis.
    Martin TW; Moody JM; Bird JJ; Slife D; Murgo JP
    Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn; 1992 Apr; 25(4):265-71. PubMed ID: 1571986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.