BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

265 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7850959)

  • 21. Comparison of valve resistance with effective orifice area regarding flow dependence.
    Blais C; Pibarot P; Dumesnil JG; Garcia D; Chen D; Durand LG
    Am J Cardiol; 2001 Jul; 88(1):45-52. PubMed ID: 11423057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Doppler assessment of prosthetic valve orifice area. An in vitro study.
    Baumgartner H; Khan SS; DeRobertis M; Czer LS; Maurer G
    Circulation; 1992 Jun; 85(6):2275-83. PubMed ID: 1591841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Assessment of left ventricular outflow tract geometry in non-stenotic and stenotic aortic valves by cardiovascular magnetic resonance.
    Burgstahler C; Kunze M; Löffler C; Gawaz MP; Hombach V; Merkle N
    J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2006; 8(6):825-9. PubMed ID: 17060105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. In vitro measurement of stenotic human aortic valve orifice area in a pulsatile flow model. Validation of the continuity equation.
    Perakis AC; Montarello JK; Rosenthal E; Boyd EG; Yates AK; Deverall PB; Curry PV; Sowton E
    Eur Heart J; 1990 Jun; 11(6):492-9. PubMed ID: 2351158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Aortic valve orifice equation independent of valvular flow intervals: application to aortic valve area computation in aortic stenosis and comparison with the Gorlin formula.
    Seitz W; Oppenheimer L; McIlroy M; Nelson D; Operschall J
    Eur Heart J; 1986 Dec; 7(12):1022-9. PubMed ID: 3830201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. A comparison of valve resistance, the continuity equation, and the Gorlin formula against directly observed orifice area in bioprosthetic valves in the mitral position: an in vitro study.
    Chambers JB; Wang Z; Cooke RA; Black MM
    J Heart Valve Dis; 1996 Mar; 5(2):136-43. PubMed ID: 8665004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Aortic valve replacement reduces valvuloarterial impedance but does not affect systemic arterial compliance in elderly men with degenerative calcific trileaflet aortic valve stenosis.
    Pagel PS; Schroeder AR; De Vry DJ; Hudetz JA
    J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth; 2014 Dec; 28(6):1540-4. PubMed ID: 25267695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. What do you mean by aortic valve area: geometric orifice area, effective orifice area, or gorlin area?
    Garcia D; Kadem L
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2006 Sep; 15(5):601-8. PubMed ID: 17044363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. In-vivo analysis of the instantaneous transvalvular pressure difference-flow relationship in aortic valve stenosis: implications of unsteady fluid-dynamics for the clinical assessment of disease severity.
    Bermejo J; Antoranz JC; Burwash IG; Alvarez JL; Moreno M; García-Fernández MA; Otto CM
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2002 Jul; 11(4):557-66. PubMed ID: 12150306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Valve orifice area alone is an insufficient index of aortic stenosis severity: effects of the proximal and distal geometry on transaortic energy loss.
    Heinrich RS; Marcus RH; Ensley AE; Gibson DE; Yoganathan AP
    J Heart Valve Dis; 1999 Sep; 8(5):509-15. PubMed ID: 10517392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Valve orifice area in aortic stenosis evaluated by planimetry, Gorlin and continuity equations: a prospective study.
    João I; Cotrim C; Duarte JA; Fazendas P; Catarino C; Pereira H; Matias F; de Oliveira LM; Carrageta M
    Rev Port Cardiol; 2002 Apr; 21(4):421-34. PubMed ID: 12090128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Pressure recovery in aortic stenosis: an in vitro study in a pulsatile flow model.
    Voelker W; Reul H; Stelzer T; Schmidt A; Karsch KR
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 1992 Dec; 20(7):1585-93. PubMed ID: 1452933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Continuity equation and Gorlin formula compared with directly observed orifice area in native and prosthetic aortic valves.
    Chambers JB; Sprigings DC; Cochrane T; Allen J; Morris R; Black MM; Jackson G
    Br Heart J; 1992 Feb; 67(2):193-9. PubMed ID: 1540443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Determination of aortic valve area in valvular aortic stenosis by direct measurement using intracardiac echocardiography: a comparison with the Gorlin and continuity equations.
    Foster GP; Weissman NJ; Picard MH; Fitzpatrick PJ; Shubrooks SJ; Zarich SW
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 1996 Feb; 27(2):392-8. PubMed ID: 8557911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Effects of increasing flow rate on aortic stenotic indices: evidence from percutaneous transvenous balloon dilatation of the mitral valve in patients with combined aortic and mitral stenosis.
    Lee TM; Su SF; Chen MF; Liau CS; Lee YT
    Heart; 1996 Dec; 76(6):490-4. PubMed ID: 9014796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Non-invasive variant of Gorlin formula can be used to identify severe aortic stenosis.
    Wandt B; Sörgaard F; Bojö L
    Clin Physiol; 1994 May; 14(3):311-6. PubMed ID: 8026148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Doppler echocardiographic assessment of hemodynamic progression of valvular aortic stenosis over time: comparison between aortic valve resistance and valve area.
    Faggiano P; Gualeni A; Antonini-Canterin F; Rusconi C; Nicolosi G
    G Ital Cardiol; 1999 Oct; 29(10):1131-6. PubMed ID: 10546122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Reliability of new and old Doppler echocardiographic indexes of the severity of aortic stenosis in patients with a low cardiac output.
    Antonini-Canterin F; Huang G; Cervesato E; Faggiano P; Pavan D; Piazza R; Burelli C; Cassin M; Macor F; Zardo F; Nicolosi GL
    Ital Heart J; 2002 Apr; 3(4):248-55. PubMed ID: 12025374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Inconsistencies of echocardiographic criteria for the grading of aortic valve stenosis.
    Minners J; Allgeier M; Gohlke-Baerwolf C; Kienzle RP; Neumann FJ; Jander N
    Eur Heart J; 2008 Apr; 29(8):1043-8. PubMed ID: 18156619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Pressure gradient vs. flow relationships to characterize the physiology of a severely stenotic aortic valve before and after transcatheter valve implantation.
    Johnson NP; Zelis JM; Tonino PAL; Houthuizen P; Bouwman RA; Brueren GRG; Johnson DT; Koolen JJ; Korsten HHM; Wijnbergen IF; Zimmermann FM; Kirkeeide RL; Pijls NHJ; Gould KL
    Eur Heart J; 2018 Jul; 39(28):2646-2655. PubMed ID: 29617762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.