These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
163 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7850965)
1. Comparison of upper limit of vulnerability and defibrillation probability of success curves using a nonthoracotomy lead system. Souza JJ; Malkin RA; Ideker RE Circulation; 1995 Feb; 91(4):1247-52. PubMed ID: 7850965 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effect of rapid pacing and T-wave scanning on the relation between the defibrillation and upper-limit-of-vulnerability dose-response curves. Malkin RA; Idriss SF; Walker RG; Ideker RE Circulation; 1995 Sep; 92(5):1291-9. PubMed ID: 7648678 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Correlation of acute and chronic defibrillation threshold with upper limit of vulnerability determined in normal sinus rhythm. Birgersdotter-Green U; Undesser K; Fujimura O; Feld GK; Kass RM; Mandel WJ; Peter CT; Chen PS J Interv Card Electrophysiol; 1999 Jul; 3(2):155-61. PubMed ID: 10387143 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effects of transvenous electrode polarity and waveform duration on the relationship between defibrillation threshold and upper limit of vulnerability. Huang J; KenKnight BH; Walcott GP; Rollins DL; Smith WM; Ideker RE Circulation; 1997 Aug; 96(4):1351-9. PubMed ID: 9286969 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Timing of the upper limit of vulnerability is different for monophasic and biphasic shocks: implications for the determination of the defibrillation threshold. Behrens S; Li C; Franz MR Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1997 Sep; 20(9 Pt 1):2179-87. PubMed ID: 9309741 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Electrode polarity is an important determinant of defibrillation efficacy using a nonthoracotomy system. Thakur RK; Souza JJ; Chapman PD; Troup PJ; Wetherbee JN Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1994 May; 17(5 Pt 1):919-23. PubMed ID: 8022704 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effect of biphasic shock duration on defibrillation threshold with different electrode configurations and phase 2 capacitances: prediction by upper-limit-of-vulnerability determination. Schauerte PN; Ziegert K; Waldmann M; Schöndube FA; Birkenhauer F; Mischke K; Grossmann M; Hanrath P; Stellbrink C Circulation; 1999 Mar; 99(11):1516-22. PubMed ID: 10086978 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The zone of vulnerability to T wave shocks in humans. Swerdlow CD; Martin DJ; Kass RM; Davie S; Mandel WJ; Gang ES; Chen PS J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 1997 Feb; 8(2):145-54. PubMed ID: 9147699 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Using the upper limit of vulnerability to assess defibrillation efficacy at implantation of ICDs. Swerdlow CD; Shehata M; Chen PS Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2007 Feb; 30(2):258-70. PubMed ID: 17338725 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effect of pacing site on ventricular fibrillation initiation by shocks during the vulnerable period. Idriss SF; Wolf PD; Smith WM; Ideker RE Am J Physiol; 1999 Nov; 277(5):H2065-82. PubMed ID: 10564163 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The effect of cardiac compression on defibrillation efficacy and the upper limit of vulnerability. Idriss SF; Anstadt MP; Anstadt GL; Ideker RE J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 1995 May; 6(5):368-78. PubMed ID: 7551306 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A direct comparison of epicardial and nonthoracotomy defibrillation using monophasic and biphasic shocks. Thakur RK; Souza JJ; Troup PJ; Chapman PD; Wetherbee JN Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1995 Jan; 18(1 Pt 1):70-4. PubMed ID: 7700834 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Electrophysiological effects of monophasic and biphasic stimuli in normal and infarcted dogs. Wharton JM; Richard VJ; Murry CE; Dixon EG; Reimer KA; Meador J; Smith WM; Ideker RE Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1990 Sep; 13(9):1158-72. PubMed ID: 1700392 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Low-energy endocardial defibrillation using dual, triple, and quadruple electrode systems. Munsif AN; Saksena S; DeGroot P; Krol RB; Matthew P; Giorgberidze I; Kaushik RR; Mehra R Am J Cardiol; 1997 Jun; 79(12):1632-9. PubMed ID: 9202354 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Detection of the defibrillation threshold using the upper limit of vulnerability following defibrillator implantation. Kirilmaz A; Dokumaci B; Uzun M; Kilicaslan F; Dinckal MH; Yucel O; Karaca M Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2005 Jun; 28(6):498-505. PubMed ID: 15955181 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Internal cardioversion of atrial fibrillation in sheep. Cooper RA; Alferness CA; Smith WM; Ideker RE Circulation; 1993 May; 87(5):1673-86. PubMed ID: 8491023 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Left ventricular apex ablation decreases the upper limit of vulnerability. Chattipakorn N; Fotuhi PC; Zheng X; Ideker RE Circulation; 2000 May; 101(21):2458-60. PubMed ID: 10831517 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Direct comparison of monophasic, biphasic and sequential pulse defibrillation over a single current pathway. Thakur R; Souza JJ; Chapman PD; Troup PJ; Wetherbee JN Can J Cardiol; 1996 Apr; 12(4):407-11. PubMed ID: 8608460 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Estimating defibrillation efficacy using combined upper limit of vulnerability and defibrillation testing. Malkin RA; Pilkington TC; Ideker RE IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1996 Jan; 43(1):69-78. PubMed ID: 8567007 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effects of polarity on defibrillation thresholds using a biphasic waveform in a hot can electrode system. Yamanouchi Y; Mowrey KA; Nadzam GR; Hills DG; Kroll MW; Brewer JE; Donohoo AM; Wilkoff BL; Tchou PJ Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1997 Dec; 20(12 Pt 1):2911-6. PubMed ID: 9455750 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]