108 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7851084)
1. Etest for antifungal susceptibility testing of yeasts.
Espinel-Ingroff A
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis; 1994 Aug; 19(4):217-20. PubMed ID: 7851084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Quality control guidelines for National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards recommended broth macrodilution testing of amphotericin B, fluconazole, and flucytosine.
Pfaller MA; Bale M; Buschelman B; Lancaster M; Espinel-Ingroff A; Rex JH; Rinaldi MG; Cooper CR; McGinnis MR
J Clin Microbiol; 1995 May; 33(5):1104-7. PubMed ID: 7615713
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Multi-centre evaluation of the Etest method for antifungal drug susceptibility testing of Candida spp. and Cryptococcus neoformans. BSAC Working Party on Antifungal Chemotherapy.
Warnock DW; Johnson EM; Rogers TR
J Antimicrob Chemother; 1998 Sep; 42(3):321-31. PubMed ID: 9786472
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of antifungal MICs for yeasts obtained using the EUCAST method in a reference laboratory and the Etest in nine different hospital laboratories.
Dannaoui E; Paugam A; Develoux M; Chochillon C; Matheron J; Datry A; Bouges-Michel C; Bonnal C; Dromer F; Bretagne S
Clin Microbiol Infect; 2010 Jul; 16(7):863-9. PubMed ID: 19778296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Multicenter comparison of a colorimetric microdilution broth method with the reference macrodilution method for in vitro susceptibility testing of yeast isolates.
Pfaller MA; Buschelman B; Bale MJ; Lancaster M; Espinel-Ingroff A; Rex JH; Rinaldi MG
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis; 1994 May; 19(1):9-13. PubMed ID: 7956018
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Evaluation of a new method for antifungal drugs susceptibility testing to yeasts].
Ishigaki S; Kawakami S; Ono Y; Miyazawa Y
Kansenshogaku Zasshi; 2000 Mar; 74(3):221-30. PubMed ID: 10783576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Antifungal susceptibility of bloodstream yeasts isolated at a public children's hospital in Brazil: comparison of the Etest and the AFST-EUCAST microdilution method.
Matsumoto FE; Dias AL; Melhem MS; Szeszs MW; Auler ME; Ruiz LS; Gonçalves da Silva E; Gandra RF; Paula CR
Can J Microbiol; 2007 Dec; 53(12):1300-6. PubMed ID: 18059562
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Selection of candidate quality control isolates and tentative quality control ranges for in vitro susceptibility testing of yeast isolates by National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards proposed standard methods.
Pfaller MA; Bale M; Buschelman B; Lancaster M; Espinel-Ingroff A; Rex JH; Rinaldi MG
J Clin Microbiol; 1994 Jul; 32(7):1650-3. PubMed ID: 7929752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Susceptibility testing of yeasts against fluconazole: comparison of the Etest method with microdilution and agar dilution].
Schmalreck AF; Kottmann I; Reiser A; Ruffer U; Vanca E
Mycoses; 1996; 39 Suppl 2():31-8. PubMed ID: 9198742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparative evaluation of standard dilution method and commercial kit for frozen plate antifungal susceptibility testing of yeasts using 200 clinical isolates.
Makimura K; Suzuki T; Tamura T; Ikedo M; Hanazawa R; Takahashi Y; Yamada Y; Uchida K; Yamaguchi H
Microbiol Immunol; 2004; 48(10):747-53. PubMed ID: 15502407
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluation of Etest and macrodilution broth method for antifungal susceptibility testing of Candida sp strains isolated from oral cavities of AIDS patients.
Silva Mdo R; Costa MR; Miranda AT; Fernandes Ode F; Costa CR; Paula CR
Rev Inst Med Trop Sao Paulo; 2002; 44(3):121-5. PubMed ID: 12163903
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of the Etest and microdilution method for antifungal susceptibility testing of Cryptococcus neoformans to four antifungal agents.
Aller AI; Martín-Mazuelos E; Gutiérrez MJ; Bernal S; Chávez M; Recio FJ
J Antimicrob Chemother; 2000 Dec; 46(6):997-1000. PubMed ID: 11102421
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluation of Etest for direct antifungal susceptibility testing of yeasts in positive blood cultures.
Chang HC; Chang JJ; Chan SH; Huang AH; Wu TL; Lin MC; Chang TC
J Clin Microbiol; 2001 Apr; 39(4):1328-33. PubMed ID: 11283051
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. In vitro activity of amphotericin B, flucytosine and fluconazole against yeasts causing bloodstream infections.
Berenguer J; Fernández-Baca V; Sánchez R; Bouza E
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis; 1995 Apr; 14(4):362-5. PubMed ID: 7649205
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. In vitro activities of voriconazole and five licensed antifungal agents against Candida dubliniensis: comparison of CLSI M27-A2, Sensititre YeastOne, disk diffusion, and Etest methods.
Salgado-Parreño FJ; Alcoba-Flórez J; Arias A; Moragues MD; Quindós G; Pontón J; Arévalo MP
Microb Drug Resist; 2006; 12(4):246-51. PubMed ID: 17227209
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Multisite evaluation of a colorimetric broth microdilution antifungal susceptibility testing].
Yamane N; Igari J
Rinsho Byori; 1997 Feb; 45(2):190-9. PubMed ID: 9121005
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Multicenter evaluation of commercial frozen plates for microdilution broth antifungal susceptibility testing of yeasts and comparison of MIC limits recommended in NCCLS M27-A2.
Makimura K; Oguri T; Mikami Y; Kume H; Hanazawa R; Abe M; Ikeda R; Shinoda T
Microbiol Immunol; 2005; 49(2):97-106. PubMed ID: 15722594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparative evaluation of Etest and sensititre yeastone panels against the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute M27-A2 reference broth microdilution method for testing Candida susceptibility to seven antifungal agents.
Alexander BD; Byrne TC; Smith KL; Hanson KE; Anstrom KJ; Perfect JR; Reller LB
J Clin Microbiol; 2007 Mar; 45(3):698-706. PubMed ID: 17202279
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Interlaboratory evaluation of VITEK2 system and Sensititre YeastOne® for antifungal susceptibility testing of yeasts isolated from blood cultures against four antifungal agents.
Farina C; Manso E; Andreoni S; Conte M; Fazii P; Lombardi G; Sanna S; Russello G
New Microbiol; 2011 Apr; 34(2):195-201. PubMed ID: 21617832
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of Etests and Vitek 2 ® to broth microdilution for the susceptibility testing of Cryptococcus neoformans.
Mahabeer Y; Chang CC; Naidu D; Dorasamy A; Lewin S; Ndung'u T; Moosa MY; French M; Mlisana K; Coovadia Y
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis; 2014 Dec; 80(4):294-8. PubMed ID: 25277745
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
