BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

173 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7851334)

  • 1. Meta-analysis in cancer epidemiology.
    Morris RD
    Environ Health Perspect; 1994 Nov; 102 Suppl 8(Suppl 8):61-6. PubMed ID: 7851334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Can trial quality be reliably assessed from published reports of cancer trials: evaluation of risk of bias assessments in systematic reviews.
    Vale CL; Tierney JF; Burdett S
    BMJ; 2013 Apr; 346():f1798. PubMed ID: 23610376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Can statistic adjustment of OR minimize the potential confounding bias for meta-analysis of case-control study? A secondary data analysis.
    Liu T; Nie X; Wu Z; Zhang Y; Feng G; Cai S; Lv Y; Peng X
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2017 Dec; 17(1):179. PubMed ID: 29284414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Review articles and publication bias.
    Kleijnen J; Knipschild P
    Arzneimittelforschung; 1992 May; 42(5):587-91. PubMed ID: 1388359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Publication bias in obesity treatment trials?
    Allison DB; Faith MS; Gorman BS
    Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord; 1996 Oct; 20(10):931-7. PubMed ID: 8910098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Issues in subgroup analyses and meta-analyses of clinical trials.
    Bigger JT
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2003 Sep; 14(9 Suppl):S6-8. PubMed ID: 12950510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Problems with meta-analysis.
    Herbison P
    N Z Med J; 1999 Feb; 112(1081):38-41. PubMed ID: 10078215
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Detecting and adjusting for small-study effects in meta-analysis.
    Rücker G; Carpenter JR; Schwarzer G
    Biom J; 2011 Mar; 53(2):351-68. PubMed ID: 21374698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Further statistics in dentistry Part 8: Systematic reviews and meta-analyses.
    Petrie A; Bulman JS; Osborn JF
    Br Dent J; 2003 Jan; 194(2):73-8. PubMed ID: 12577072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Application of credibility ceilings probes the robustness of meta-analyses of biomarkers and cancer risk.
    Papatheodorou SI; Tsilidis KK; Evangelou E; Ioannidis JP
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2015 Feb; 68(2):163-74. PubMed ID: 25433443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Exploratory or analytic meta-analysis: should we distinguish between them?
    Anello C; Fleiss JL
    J Clin Epidemiol; 1995 Jan; 48(1):109-16; discussion 117-8. PubMed ID: 7853037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Limitations of meta-analysis from published data in epidemiological research].
    Blettner M; Schlehofer B; Sauerbrei W
    Soz Praventivmed; 1997; 42(2):95-104. PubMed ID: 9221627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Meta-analysis for orthodontists: Part II--Is all that glitters gold?
    Papageorgiou SN
    J Orthod; 2014 Dec; 41(4):327-36. PubMed ID: 25404669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Deconstructing evidence in orthodontics: making sense of systematic reviews, randomized clinical trials, and meta-analyses.
    Rinchuse DJ; Rinchuse DJ; Kandasamy S; Ackerman MB
    World J Orthod; 2008; 9(2):167-76. PubMed ID: 18575311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Abstract analysis method facilitates filtering low-methodological quality and high-bias risk systematic reviews on psoriasis interventions.
    Gómez-García F; Ruano J; Aguilar-Luque M; Alcalde-Mellado P; Gay-Mimbrera J; Hernández-Romero JL; Sanz-Cabanillas JL; Maestre-López B; González-Padilla M; Carmona-Fernández PJ; García-Nieto AV; Isla-Tejera B
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2017 Dec; 17(1):180. PubMed ID: 29284417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management: part 6. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of observational studies.
    Manchikanti L; Datta S; Smith HS; Hirsch JA
    Pain Physician; 2009; 12(5):819-50. PubMed ID: 19787009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Quality control in systematic reviews and meta-analyses.
    Bown MJ; Sutton AJ
    Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg; 2010 Nov; 40(5):669-77. PubMed ID: 20732826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The role of systematic reviews and meta-analyses of incidence and prevalence studies in neuroepidemiology.
    Fiest KM; Pringsheim T; Patten SB; Svenson LW; Jetté N
    Neuroepidemiology; 2014; 42(1):16-24. PubMed ID: 24356060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The impact of dietary and lifestyle risk factors on risk of colorectal cancer: a quantitative overview of the epidemiological evidence.
    Huxley RR; Ansary-Moghaddam A; Clifton P; Czernichow S; Parr CL; Woodward M
    Int J Cancer; 2009 Jul; 125(1):171-80. PubMed ID: 19350627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Best evidence synthesis: an intelligent alternative to meta-analysis.
    Slavin RE
    J Clin Epidemiol; 1995 Jan; 48(1):9-18. PubMed ID: 7853053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.