These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

270 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7851592)

  • 1. Use of postseparation sperm parameters to determine the method of choice for sperm preparation for assisted reproductive technology.
    Smith S; Hosid S; Scott L
    Fertil Steril; 1995 Mar; 63(3):591-7. PubMed ID: 7851592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Preparation of human frozen-thawed seminal specimens using the SpermPrep filtration method: improvements over the conventional swim-up method.
    Zavos PM
    Fertil Steril; 1992 Jun; 57(6):1326-30. PubMed ID: 1601158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of three sperm preparation media.
    Sharma RK; Seifarth K; Garlak D; Agarwal A
    Int J Fertil Womens Med; 1999; 44(3):163-7. PubMed ID: 10435917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Preparation of oligozoospermic and/or asthenozoospermic semen for intrauterine insemination using the SpermPrep semen filtration column.
    Ohashi K; Saji F; Wakimoto A; Kato M; Tsutsui T; Tanizawa O
    Fertil Steril; 1992 Apr; 57(4):866-70. PubMed ID: 1313377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Preparation by differential gradient centrifugation is better than swim-up in selecting sperm with normal morphology (strict criteria).
    Prakash P; Leykin L; Chen Z; Toth T; Sayegh R; Schiff I; Isaacson K
    Fertil Steril; 1998 Apr; 69(4):722-6. PubMed ID: 9548164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Selection of human spermatozoa by a hyperosmotic two-layer Percoll gradient.
    Chan YM; Abuzeid MI; Malcomnson JH; Sasy MA
    Fertil Steril; 1994 Jun; 61(6):1097-102. PubMed ID: 8194624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effects of four methods of sperm preparation on the motile concentration, morphology, and acrosome status of recovered sperm from normal semen samples.
    Brandeis VT; Manuel MT
    J Assist Reprod Genet; 1993 Aug; 10(6):409-16. PubMed ID: 8019090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Combination of direct swim-up technique and discontinuous Percoll gradient centrifugation for sperm preparation of oligoasthenozoospermic samples.
    Chen SU; Ho HN; Chen HF; Chao KH; Wu MY; Chen CD; Huang SC; Lee TY; Yang YS
    Arch Androl; 1996; 37(2):103-9. PubMed ID: 8886259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluation of quality of spermatozoa prepared by SpermPrep method as compared to those prepared by MiniPercoll.
    Joshi NJ; Raj JP; Sundaram GS
    Andrologia; 1998; 30(2):79-83. PubMed ID: 9629427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Sperm selection by PD-10 sephadex columns: comparison with SpermPrep filtration and Percoll centrifugation.
    López O; Mata A; Antich M; Bassas L
    Hum Reprod; 1993 May; 8(5):732-6. PubMed ID: 8314969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison between the quality and function of sperm after semen processing with two different methods.
    Hammadeh ME; Zavos PM; Rosenbaum P; Schmidt W
    Asian J Androl; 2001 Jun; 3(2):125-30. PubMed ID: 11404797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Glass wool column filtration versus mini-Percoll gradient for processing poor quality semen samples.
    Johnson DE; Confino E; Jeyendran RS
    Fertil Steril; 1996 Sep; 66(3):459-62. PubMed ID: 8751748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Separation of human semen on Percoll gradients: effect on percentage of motile and morphologically normal sperm and proportion of acrosome reacted sperm.
    Singer R; Fish B; Levinsky H; Zukerman Z; Sagiv M; Cohen A; Barnet M; Lurie BB; Lahav M
    Int J Fertil Menopausal Stud; 1995; 40(3):161-6. PubMed ID: 7663543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparisons of sperm quality, morphometry and function among human sperm populations recovered via SpermPrep II filtration, swim-up and Percoll density gradient methods.
    Yamamoto Y; Maenosono S; Okada H; Miyagawa I; Sofikitis N
    Andrologia; 1997; 29(6):303-10. PubMed ID: 9430435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A Mono-Percoll separation technique improves sperm recovery of normal and male factor specimens when compared with the swim-up technique.
    Shalika S; Dugan K; Pelesh D; Padilla S
    Hum Reprod; 1995 Dec; 10(12):3195-7. PubMed ID: 8822442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of Percoll, mini-Percoll and swim-up methods for sperm preparation from abnormal semen samples.
    Ng FL; Liu DY; Baker HW
    Hum Reprod; 1992 Feb; 7(2):261-6. PubMed ID: 1315792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Techniques of sperm selection and in vitro fertilization results.
    Leonetti T; Causio F; Cagnazzo G
    Acta Eur Fertil; 1995; 26(1):31-4. PubMed ID: 8923915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Sperm morphology and IVF pregnancy rate: comparison between Percoll gradient centrifugation and swim-up procedures.
    Van der Zwalmen P; Bertin-Segal G; Geerts L; Debauche C; Schoysman R
    Hum Reprod; 1991 Apr; 6(4):581-8. PubMed ID: 1918311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of single- and two-layer Percoll separation for selection of motile spermatozoa.
    Sharma RK; Seifarth K; Agarwal A
    Int J Fertil Womens Med; 1997; 42(6):412-7. PubMed ID: 9459085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison between a two-layer discontinuous Percoll gradient and swim-up for sperm preparation on normal and abnormal semen samples.
    Chen SU; Ho HN; Chen HF; Chao KH; Lin HR; Huang SC; Lee TY; Yang YS
    J Assist Reprod Genet; 1995 Nov; 12(10):698-703. PubMed ID: 8624426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.