These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

107 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7851930)

  • 1. Evaluation of boundary element methods for the EEG forward problem: effect of linear interpolation.
    Schlitt HA; Heller L; Aaron R; Best E; Ranken DM
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1995 Jan; 42(1):52-8. PubMed ID: 7851930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Review on solving the forward problem in EEG source analysis.
    Hallez H; Vanrumste B; Grech R; Muscat J; De Clercq W; Vergult A; D'Asseler Y; Camilleri KP; Fabri SG; Van Huffel S; Lemahieu I
    J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2007 Nov; 4():46. PubMed ID: 18053144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Conventional and reciprocal approaches to the inverse dipole localization problem of electroencephalography.
    Finke S; Gulrajani RM; Gotman J
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2003 Jun; 50(6):657-66. PubMed ID: 12814232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A meshless method for solving the EEG forward problem.
    von Ellenrieder N; Muravchik CH; Nehorai A
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2005 Feb; 52(2):249-57. PubMed ID: 15709662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Improving the accuracy of the boundary element method by the use of second-order interpolation functions.
    Frijns JH; de Snoo SL; Schoonhoven R
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2000 Oct; 47(10):1336-46. PubMed ID: 11059168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Dipole models for the EEG and MEG.
    Schimpf PH; Ramon C; Haueisen J
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2002 May; 49(5):409-18. PubMed ID: 12002172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Using reciprocity for relating the simulation of transcranial current stimulation to the EEG forward problem.
    Wagner S; Lucka F; Vorwerk J; Herrmann CS; Nolte G; Burger M; Wolters CH
    Neuroimage; 2016 Oct; 140():163-73. PubMed ID: 27125841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. New Strategy for Finite Element Mesh Generation for Accurate Solutions of Electroencephalography Forward Problems.
    Lee C; Im CH
    Brain Topogr; 2019 May; 32(3):354-362. PubMed ID: 30073558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A method for localizing EEG sources in realistic head models.
    Cuffin BN
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1995 Jan; 42(1):68-71. PubMed ID: 7851932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Rapidly recomputable EEG forward models for realistic head shapes.
    Ermer JJ; Mosher JC; Baillet S; Leah RM
    Phys Med Biol; 2001 Apr; 46(4):1265-81. PubMed ID: 11324964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Conventional and reciprocal approaches to the inverse dipole localization problem for N(20)-P (20) somatosensory evoked potentials.
    Finke S; Gulrajani RM; Gotman J; Savard P
    Brain Topogr; 2013 Jan; 26(1):24-34. PubMed ID: 22723019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Parametric surface-source modeling and estimation with electroencephalography.
    Cao N; Yetik IS; Nehorai A; Muravchik CH; Haueisen J
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2006 Dec; 53(12 Pt 1):2414-24. PubMed ID: 17153198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A finite-element reciprocity solution for EEG forward modeling with realistic individual head models.
    Ziegler E; Chellappa SL; Gaggioni G; Ly JQM; Vandewalle G; André E; Geuzaine C; Phillips C
    Neuroimage; 2014 Dec; 103():542-551. PubMed ID: 25204867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Forward and inverse problems of EEG dipole localization.
    Musha T; Okamoto Y
    Crit Rev Biomed Eng; 1999; 27(3-5):189-239. PubMed ID: 10864280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Application of boundary element method for more accurate localization of EEG dipole sources].
    Tkachenko ON; Frolov AA; Verkhliutov VM
    Zh Vyssh Nerv Deiat Im I P Pavlova; 2008; 58(2):247-54. PubMed ID: 18661787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Anisotropic spherical head model and its application to imaging electric activity of the brain.
    Petrov Y
    Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys; 2012 Jul; 86(1 Pt 1):011917. PubMed ID: 23005462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effects of head models and dipole source parameters on EEG fields.
    Peng L; Peng M; Xu A
    Open Biomed Eng J; 2015; 9():10-6. PubMed ID: 25893011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Effect of boundary element discretization on forward calculation and the inverse problem in electroencephalography and magnetoencephalography].
    Haueisen J; Böttner A; Funke M; Brauer H; Nowak H
    Biomed Tech (Berl); 1997 Sep; 42(9):240-8. PubMed ID: 9410154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A second-order finite element algorithm for solving the three-dimensional EEG forward problem.
    Zhang YC; Zhu SA; He B
    Phys Med Biol; 2004 Jul; 49(13):2975-87. PubMed ID: 15285259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The finite element method for a realistic head model of electrical brain activities: preliminary results.
    Thevenet M; Bertrand O; Perrin F; Dumont T; Pernier J
    Clin Phys Physiol Meas; 1991; 12 Suppl A():89-94. PubMed ID: 1778061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.