These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

101 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7851930)

  • 21. Forward problem solution of electromagnetic source imaging using a new BEM formulation with high-order elements.
    Gençer NG; Tanzer IO
    Phys Med Biol; 1999 Sep; 44(9):2275-87. PubMed ID: 10495121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Individually shaped volume conductor models of the head in EEG source localisation.
    Zanow F; Peters MJ
    Med Biol Eng Comput; 1995 Jul; 33(4):582-8. PubMed ID: 7475391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The New York Head-A precise standardized volume conductor model for EEG source localization and tES targeting.
    Huang Y; Parra LC; Haufe S
    Neuroimage; 2016 Oct; 140():150-62. PubMed ID: 26706450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Electroencephalography in ellipsoidal geometry with fourth-order harmonics.
    Alcocer-Sosa M; Gutierrez D
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2016 Aug; 2016():4523-4526. PubMed ID: 28269282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Accuracy of two dipolar inverse algorithms applying reciprocity for forward calculation.
    Laarne P; Hyttinen J; Dodel S; Malmivuo J; Eskola H
    Comput Biomed Res; 2000 Jun; 33(3):172-85. PubMed ID: 10860584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. [Models and computation methods of EEG forward problem].
    Zhang Y; Zou L; Zhu S
    Sheng Wu Yi Xue Gong Cheng Xue Za Zhi; 2004 Apr; 21(2):337-9. PubMed ID: 15143572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Influence of skull conductivity perturbations on EEG dipole source analysis.
    Chen F; Hallez H; Staelens S
    Med Phys; 2010 Aug; 37(8):4475-84. PubMed ID: 20879606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. High-resolution EEG mapping: an equivalent charge-layer approach.
    Yao D
    Phys Med Biol; 2003 Jul; 48(13):1997-2011. PubMed ID: 12884931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Estimating parametric line-source models with electroencephalography.
    Cao N; Yetik IS; Nehorai A; Muravchik CH; Haueisen J
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2006 Nov; 53(11):2156-65. PubMed ID: 17073320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Finite-element model of the human head: scalp potentials due to dipole sources.
    Yan Y; Nunez PL; Hart RT
    Med Biol Eng Comput; 1991 Sep; 29(5):475-81. PubMed ID: 1817208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. A novel volume integral equation for solving the Electroencephalography forward problem.
    Rahmouni L; Mitharwal R; Andriulli FP
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2015; 2015():4061-4. PubMed ID: 26737186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. A comparison of different numerical methods for solving the forward problem in EEG and MEG.
    Pruis GW; Gilding BH; Peters MJ
    Physiol Meas; 1993 Nov; 14 Suppl 4A():A1-9. PubMed ID: 8274975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. A simple method for EEG guided transcranial electrical stimulation without models.
    Cancelli A; Cottone C; Tecchio F; Truong DQ; Dmochowski J; Bikson M
    J Neural Eng; 2016 Jun; 13(3):036022. PubMed ID: 27172063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Electroencephalographic Source Reconstruction by the Finite-Element Approximation of the Elliptic Cauchy Problem.
    Malovichko M; Koshev N; Yavich N; Razorenova A; Fedorov M
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2021 Jun; 68(6):1811-1819. PubMed ID: 32877329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Influence of the head model on EEG and MEG source connectivity analyses.
    Cho JH; Vorwerk J; Wolters CH; Knösche TR
    Neuroimage; 2015 Apr; 110():60-77. PubMed ID: 25638756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. An advanced boundary element method (BEM) implementation for the forward problem of electromagnetic source imaging.
    Akalin-Acar Z; Gençer NG
    Phys Med Biol; 2004 Nov; 49(21):5011-28. PubMed ID: 15584534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. [Numerical verification of the analytic solution of electrical potential in a homogeneous conducting sphere in numerical value].
    Liu H; Peng S
    Sheng Wu Yi Xue Gong Cheng Xue Za Zhi; 2004 Jun; 21(3):367-70. PubMed ID: 15250135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Improved dipole localization using local mesh refinement of realistic head geometries: an EEG simulation study.
    Yvert B; Bertrand O; Echallier JF; Pernier J
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1996 Jul; 99(1):79-89. PubMed ID: 8758973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The analytical subtraction approach for solving the forward problem in EEG.
    Beltrachini L
    J Neural Eng; 2019 Sep; 16(5):056029. PubMed ID: 31158827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Neonatal EEG at scalp is focal and implies high skull conductivity in realistic neonatal head models.
    Odabaee M; Tokariev A; Layeghy S; Mesbah M; Colditz PB; Ramon C; Vanhatalo S
    Neuroimage; 2014 Aug; 96():73-80. PubMed ID: 24736169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.