These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
176 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7852117)
1. Relative biological effectiveness of proton medical beam at Moscow synchrotron determined by the Chinese hamster cells assay. Yashkin PN; Silin DI; Zolotov VA; Kostjuchenko VI; Nichiporov DF; Feoktistova TP; Martirosov KS; Minakova YI; Khoroshkov VS; Polonski PB Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1995 Feb; 31(3):535-40. PubMed ID: 7852117 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Radiobiological characterization of two therapeutic proton beams with different initial energy spectra used at the Institut Curie Proton Therapy Center in Orsay. Calugaru V; Nauraye C; Noël G; Giocanti N; Favaudon V; Mégnin-Chanet F Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2011 Nov; 81(4):1136-43. PubMed ID: 21075549 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Measurements of relative biological effectiveness of the 70 MeV proton beam at TRIUMF using Chinese hamster V79 cells and the high-precision cell sorter assay. Wouters BG; Lam GK; Oelfke U; Gardey K; Durand RE; Skarsgard LD Radiat Res; 1996 Aug; 146(2):159-70. PubMed ID: 8693066 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Variations in the RBE for cell killing along the depth-dose profile of a modulated proton therapy beam. Britten RA; Nazaryan V; Davis LK; Klein SB; Nichiporov D; Mendonca MS; Wolanski M; Nie X; George J; Keppel C Radiat Res; 2013 Jan; 179(1):21-8. PubMed ID: 23148508 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Radiobiological intercomparison of the 160 MeV and 230 MeV proton therapy beams at the Harvard Cyclotron Laboratory and at Massachusetts General Hospital. Wouters BG; Skarsgard LD; Gerweck LE; Carabe-Fernandez A; Wong M; Durand RE; Nielson D; Bussiere MR; Wagner M; Biggs P; Paganetti H; Suit HD Radiat Res; 2015 Feb; 183(2):174-87. PubMed ID: 25587741 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Empirical model estimation of relative biological effectiveness for proton beam therapy. Chen Y; Ahmad S Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2012 Apr; 149(2):116-23. PubMed ID: 21593038 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Interaction between the biological effects of high- and low-LET radiation dose components in a mixed field exposure. Mason AJ; Giusti V; Green S; Munck af Rosenschöld P; Beynon TD; Hopewell JW Int J Radiat Biol; 2011 Dec; 87(12):1162-72. PubMed ID: 21923301 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Difference in the relative biological effectiveness and DNA damage repair processes in response to proton beam therapy according to the positions of the spread out Bragg peak. Hojo H; Dohmae T; Hotta K; Kohno R; Motegi A; Yagishita A; Makinoshima H; Tsuchihara K; Akimoto T Radiat Oncol; 2017 Jul; 12(1):111. PubMed ID: 28673358 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Monte Carlo simulations of therapeutic proton beams for relative biological effectiveness of double-strand break. Wang CC; Hsiao Y; Lee CC; Chao TC; Wang CC; Tung CJ Int J Radiat Biol; 2012 Jan; 88(1-2):158-63. PubMed ID: 21823821 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Measurements of radiobiological effectiveness in the 85 MeV proton beam produced at the cyclotron CYCLONE of Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium. Gueulette J; Grégoire V; Octave-Prignot M; Wambersie A Radiat Res; 1996 Jan; 145(1):70-4. PubMed ID: 8532839 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Significance and implementation of RBE variations in proton beam therapy. Paganetti H Technol Cancer Res Treat; 2003 Oct; 2(5):413-26. PubMed ID: 14529306 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Nuclear interactions in proton therapy: dose and relative biological effect distributions originating from primary and secondary particles. Paganetti H Phys Med Biol; 2002 Mar; 47(5):747-64. PubMed ID: 11931469 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluation of the relative biological effectiveness of spot-scanning proton irradiation in vitro. Maeda K; Yasui H; Matsuura T; Yamamori T; Suzuki M; Nagane M; Nam JM; Inanami O; Shirato H J Radiat Res; 2016 Jun; 57(3):307-11. PubMed ID: 26838131 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Relative biologic effectiveness determination in mouse intestine for scanning proton beam at Paul Scherrer Institute, Switzerland. Influence of motion. Gueulette J; Blattmann H; Pedroni E; Coray A; De Coster BM; Mahy P; Wambersie A; Goitein G Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2005 Jul; 62(3):838-45. PubMed ID: 15936568 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A mechanism-based approach to predict the relative biological effectiveness of protons and carbon ions in radiation therapy. Frese MC; Yu VK; Stewart RD; Carlson DJ Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2012 May; 83(1):442-50. PubMed ID: 22099045 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Quantification of the relative biological effectiveness for ion beam radiotherapy: direct experimental comparison of proton and carbon ion beams and a novel approach for treatment planning. Elsässer T; Weyrather WK; Friedrich T; Durante M; Iancu G; Krämer M; Kragl G; Brons S; Winter M; Weber KJ; Scholz M Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2010 Nov; 78(4):1177-83. PubMed ID: 20732758 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. In vivo radiobiological characterization of proton beam at the National Cancer Center in Korea: effect of the Chk2 mutation. Kim SS; Choo DW; Shin D; Baek HJ; Kim TH; Motoyama N; De Coster BM; Gueulette J; Furusawa Y; Ando K; Cho KH Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2011 Feb; 79(2):559-62. PubMed ID: 21195877 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]