138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7852754)
1. A comparison of the British Hypertension Society and Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation protocols for validating blood pressure measuring devices: can the two be reconciled?
O'Brien E; Atkins N
J Hypertens; 1994 Sep; 12(9):1089-94. PubMed ID: 7852754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Simultaneous validation of the SunTech 247 diagnostic station blood pressure measurement device according to the British Hypertension Society protocol, the International Protocol and the Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation standards.
Polo Friz H; Facchetti R; Primitz L; Beltrame L; Galbiati V; Ricioppo A; Bombelli M; Sega R
Blood Press Monit; 2009 Oct; 14(5):222-7. PubMed ID: 19741510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluation of the Profilomat II ambulatory blood pressure system according to the protocols of the British Hypertension Society and the Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation.
Mee F; Atkins N; O'Brien E
Blood Press Monit; 1998; 3(6):353-61. PubMed ID: 10212377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluation of three devices for self-measurement of blood pressure according to the revised British Hypertension Society Protocol: the Omron HEM-705CP, Philips HP5332, and Nissei DS-175.
O'Brien E; Mee F; Atkins N; Thomas M
Blood Press Monit; 1996 Feb; 1(1):55-61. PubMed ID: 10226203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Validation of the SAW-102 wrist home blood pressure monitor according to the protocols of the British Hypertension Society, the Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation, and the European Society of Hypertension.
Zaetta V; Longo D; Perkovic D; Perfetti P; Gabrieli A; Pratticò F; Winnicki M
Blood Press Monit; 2009 Feb; 14(1):32-6. PubMed ID: 19262198
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Accutracker II (version 30/23) ambulatory blood pressure monitor: clinical validation using the British Hypertension Society and Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation standards.
Taylor R; Chidley K; Goodwin J; Broeders M; Kirby B
J Hypertens; 1993 Nov; 11(11):1275-82. PubMed ID: 8301110
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Validation of the Omron M7 (HEM-780-E) oscillometric blood pressure monitoring device according to the British Hypertension Society protocol.
Coleman A; Steel S; Freeman P; de Greeff A; Shennan A
Blood Press Monit; 2008 Feb; 13(1):49-54. PubMed ID: 18199924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Validation of the SAA-102 home blood pressure monitor according to the protocols of the European Society of Hypertension, the Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation and the British Society of Hypertension.
Zaetta V; Daniele L; Perkovic D; Pratticò F; Barisa M; Perfetti P; Gabrieli A; Buonocore F; Winnicki M
Blood Press Monit; 2007 Dec; 12(6):363-8. PubMed ID: 18004104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The Rossmax (ME 701 series) upper arm device: accuracy assessment in an adult population according to the International and the British Hypertension Society protocols.
de Greeff A; Shennan AH
Blood Press Monit; 2008 Feb; 13(1):43-8. PubMed ID: 18199923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Twenty-four-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring: a review of validation data.
O'Brien E; O'Malley K
J Hypertens Suppl; 1990 Dec; 8(6):S11-6. PubMed ID: 2081992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluation of the accuracy of the Omron HEM-907 blood pressure device.
Gurpreet K; Tee GH; Karuthan C
Med J Malaysia; 2008 Aug; 63(3):239-43. PubMed ID: 19248698
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Automated blood pressure measurement: state of the market in 1998 and the need for an international validation protocol for blood pressure measuring devices.
O'Brien E
Blood Press Monit; 1998 Jun; 3(3):205-211. PubMed ID: 10212355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Accuracy of the SpaceLabs 90207 ambulatory blood pressure monitor in children and adolescents.
Belsha CW; Wells TG; Bowe Rice H ; Neaville WA; Berry PL
Blood Press Monit; 1996 Apr; 1(2):127-133. PubMed ID: 10226214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluation of the Schiller BR-102 ambulatory blood pressure system according to the protocols of the British Hypertension Society and the Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation.
O'Brien E; Mee F; Atkins N
Blood Press Monit; 1999 Feb; 4(1):35-43. PubMed ID: 10362889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluation of Meditech ABPM-04 ambulatory blood pressure measuring device according to the British Hypertension Society protocol.
Barna I; Keszei A; Dunai A
Blood Press Monit; 1998; 3(6):363-8. PubMed ID: 10212378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The quest for better validation: a critical comparison of the AAMI and BHS validation protocols for ambulatory blood pressure measurement systems.
O'Brien E; Mee F; Atkins N; O'Malley K
Biomed Instrum Technol; 1992; 26(5):395-9. PubMed ID: 1393208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Accuracy and 'range of uncertainty' of oscillometric blood pressure monitors around the upper arm and the wrist.
Dieterle T; Battegay E; Bucheli B; Martina B
Blood Press Monit; 1998; 3(6):339-46. PubMed ID: 10212375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Validation of the Welch Allyn 'Vital Signs' oscillometric blood pressure monitor.
Jones CR; Taylor K; Poston L; Shennan AH
J Hum Hypertens; 2001 Mar; 15(3):191-5. PubMed ID: 11317204
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Accuracy assessment of the Tensoval duo control according to the British and European Hypertension Societies' standards.
De Greeff A; Arora J; Hervey S; Liu B; Shennan AH
Blood Press Monit; 2008 Apr; 13(2):111-6. PubMed ID: 18347446
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluation of blood pressure measuring devices.
O'Brien E; Atkins N; Mee F; O'Malley K
Clin Exp Hypertens; 1993 Nov; 15(6):1087-97. PubMed ID: 8268876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
