These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

165 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7853046)

  • 1. "Large-scale randomized evidence: large, simple trials and overviews of trials": discussion. A clinician's perspective on meta-analyses.
    Horwitz RI
    J Clin Epidemiol; 1995 Jan; 48(1):41-4. PubMed ID: 7853046
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Large-scale randomized evidence: large, simple trials and overviews of trials.
    Peto R; Collins R; Gray R
    J Clin Epidemiol; 1995 Jan; 48(1):23-40. PubMed ID: 7853045
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Collaborative worldwide overviews of randomized trials.
    Sandercock P
    Ann N Y Acad Sci; 1993 Dec; 703():149-54; discussion 154-5. PubMed ID: 8192292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. "Meta-analysis: statistical alchemy for the 21st century": discussion. A plea for a more balanced view of meta-analysis and systematic overviews of the effect of health care interventions.
    Liberati A
    J Clin Epidemiol; 1995 Jan; 48(1):81-6. PubMed ID: 7853051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Meta-analyses and overviews of randomised trials.
    Richards SM
    Blood Rev; 1995 Jun; 9(2):85-91. PubMed ID: 7580394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Single-center trials show larger treatment effects than multicenter trials: evidence from a meta-epidemiologic study.
    Dechartres A; Boutron I; Trinquart L; Charles P; Ravaud P
    Ann Intern Med; 2011 Jul; 155(1):39-51. PubMed ID: 21727292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Interpretation of data from multiple trials: a critical review.
    Conn HO
    J Intern Med; 1997 Mar; 241(3):177-83. PubMed ID: 9104430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Can we learn anything from small trials?
    Sackett DL; Cook DJ
    Ann N Y Acad Sci; 1993 Dec; 703():25-31; discussion 31-2. PubMed ID: 8192301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Large-scale randomized evidence: large, simple trials and overviews of trials.
    Peto R; Collins R; Gray R
    Ann N Y Acad Sci; 1993 Dec; 703():314-40. PubMed ID: 8192313
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The need for large-scale randomized evidence without undue emphasis on small trials, meta-analyses, or subgroup analyses.
    Hennekens CH; Demets D
    JAMA; 2009 Dec; 302(21):2361-2. PubMed ID: 19952322
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management: part 6. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of observational studies.
    Manchikanti L; Datta S; Smith HS; Hirsch JA
    Pain Physician; 2009; 12(5):819-50. PubMed ID: 19787009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The need for large-scale randomized evidence.
    Baigent C
    Br J Clin Pharmacol; 1997 Apr; 43(4):349-53. PubMed ID: 9146845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Exploratory or analytic meta-analysis: should we distinguish between them?
    Anello C; Fleiss JL
    J Clin Epidemiol; 1995 Jan; 48(1):109-16; discussion 117-8. PubMed ID: 7853037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Updating meta-analyses leads to larger type I errors than publication bias.
    Borm GF; Donders AR
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2009 Aug; 62(8):825-830.e10. PubMed ID: 19136233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [A wide perspective on meta-analysis--may be of crucial significance for the patients].
    Gøtzsche PC
    Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2000 Sep; 120(23):2810. PubMed ID: 11107932
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The importance of randomized clinical trials and evidence-based medicine: a clinician's perspective.
    Kennedy HL
    Clin Cardiol; 1999 Jan; 22(1):6-12. PubMed ID: 9929747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Importance of a wide perspective on meta-analysis. It may be of crucial significance for the patients].
    Gøtzsche PC
    Ugeskr Laeger; 2000 Oct; 162(42):5601. PubMed ID: 11059294
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Robustness assessments are needed to reduce bias in meta-analyses that include zero-event randomized trials.
    Keus F; Wetterslev J; Gluud C; Gooszen HG; van Laarhoven CJ
    Am J Gastroenterol; 2009 Mar; 104(3):546-51. PubMed ID: 19262513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Basic concepts in meta-analysis: A primer for clinicians.
    Khoshdel A; Attia J; Carney SL
    Int J Clin Pract; 2006 Oct; 60(10):1287-94. PubMed ID: 16981972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Can meta-analyses be trusted?
    Thompson SG; Pocock SJ
    Lancet; 1991 Nov; 338(8775):1127-30. PubMed ID: 1682553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.