These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

177 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7853051)

  • 1. "Meta-analysis: statistical alchemy for the 21st century": discussion. A plea for a more balanced view of meta-analysis and systematic overviews of the effect of health care interventions.
    Liberati A
    J Clin Epidemiol; 1995 Jan; 48(1):81-6. PubMed ID: 7853051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Meta-analysis: statistical alchemy for the 21st century.
    Feinstein AR
    J Clin Epidemiol; 1995 Jan; 48(1):71-9. PubMed ID: 7853050
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management: part 6. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of observational studies.
    Manchikanti L; Datta S; Smith HS; Hirsch JA
    Pain Physician; 2009; 12(5):819-50. PubMed ID: 19787009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. How to read and understand and use systematic reviews and meta-analyses.
    Leucht S; Kissling W; Davis JM
    Acta Psychiatr Scand; 2009 Jun; 119(6):443-50. PubMed ID: 19469725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Exploratory or analytic meta-analysis: should we distinguish between them?
    Anello C; Fleiss JL
    J Clin Epidemiol; 1995 Jan; 48(1):109-16; discussion 117-8. PubMed ID: 7853037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. "Large-scale randomized evidence: large, simple trials and overviews of trials": discussion. A clinician's perspective on meta-analyses.
    Horwitz RI
    J Clin Epidemiol; 1995 Jan; 48(1):41-4. PubMed ID: 7853046
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Research Pearls: The Significance of Statistics and Perils of Pooling. Part 3: Pearls and Pitfalls of Meta-analyses and Systematic Reviews.
    Harris JD; Brand JC; Cote MP; Dhawan A
    Arthroscopy; 2017 Aug; 33(8):1594-1602. PubMed ID: 28457677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Interpretation of data from multiple trials: a critical review.
    Conn HO
    J Intern Med; 1997 Mar; 241(3):177-83. PubMed ID: 9104430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Response to letter to the editor from Dr Rahman Shiri: The challenging topic of suicide across occupational groups.
    Niedhammer I; Milner A; Witt K; Klingelschmidt J; Khireddine-Medouni I; Alexopoulos EC; Toivanen S; Chastang JF; LaMontagne AD
    Scand J Work Environ Health; 2018 Jan; 44(1):108-110. PubMed ID: 29218357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Statistics in medical journals: some recent trends.
    Altman DG
    Stat Med; 2000 Dec; 19(23):3275-89. PubMed ID: 11113959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Systematic reviews, overviews of reviews and comparative effectiveness reviews: a discussion of approaches to knowledge synthesis.
    Hartling L; Vandermeer B; Fernandes RM
    Evid Based Child Health; 2014 Jun; 9(2):486-94. PubMed ID: 25404611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews: a foundation for evidence-based perinatal medicine.
    Ohlsson A
    Acta Paediatr; 1996 Jun; 85(6):647-55. PubMed ID: 8816197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Meta-analyses--statistical alchemy of the 21st century?].
    Kristiansen IS
    Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2000 Sep; 120(22):2615. PubMed ID: 11077501
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Can meta-analyses be trusted?
    Thompson SG; Pocock SJ
    Lancet; 1991 Nov; 338(8775):1127-30. PubMed ID: 1682553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Methodologic guidelines for systematic reviews of randomized control trials in health care from the Potsdam Consultation on Meta-Analysis.
    Cook DJ; Sackett DL; Spitzer WO
    J Clin Epidemiol; 1995 Jan; 48(1):167-71. PubMed ID: 7853043
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Meta-analyses and overviews of randomised trials.
    Richards SM
    Blood Rev; 1995 Jun; 9(2):85-91. PubMed ID: 7580394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Meta-analyses of clinical drug trials--gold standard reviews or statistical alchemy?
    Chan ES
    Ann Acad Med Singap; 2000 Sep; 29(5):610-5. PubMed ID: 11126696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Errors in the conduct of systematic reviews of pharmacological interventions for irritable bowel syndrome.
    Ford AC; Guyatt GH; Talley NJ; Moayyedi P
    Am J Gastroenterol; 2010 Feb; 105(2):280-8. PubMed ID: 19920807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Introducing conceptual and analytical clarity on dimensions of complexity in systematic reviews of complex interventions.
    Tharyan P
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2013 Nov; 66(11):1202-4. PubMed ID: 24079643
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Systematic reviews of surgical interventions.
    Burton M; Clarke M
    Surg Clin North Am; 2006 Feb; 86(1):101-14, ix. PubMed ID: 16442423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.