These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

101 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7853078)

  • 1. Kill the ump!
    Haller KB
    J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs; 1994; 23(9):747. PubMed ID: 7853078
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Writing a feature article: not all articles are alike.
    Pelletier LR
    Nurse Author Ed; 2003; 13(4):7-8. PubMed ID: 14562512
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Conference presentations: a guide to writing the abstract.
    Happell B
    Nurse Res; 2008; 15(4):79-87. PubMed ID: 18700662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Don't send it yet! Getting your manuscript ready to submit.
    Robinson R; Rivers DL
    Nurse Author Ed; 2003; 13(4):1-4. PubMed ID: 14562511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Measuring our words on measurement.
    Froman RD
    Res Nurs Health; 2000 Dec; 23(6):421-3. PubMed ID: 11130601
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluating research proposals.
    Feigenbaum K
    Gastroenterol Nurs; 1994 Jun; 16(6):281-2. PubMed ID: 8075166
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Tips on writing for a peer-reviewed journal.
    Jones JC
    J Psychosoc Nurs Ment Health Serv; 2003 Aug; 41(8):6-7. PubMed ID: 13677005
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Methods and instruments of research. Analysis of various articles].
    Riv Inferm; 1996; 15(3):147-51. PubMed ID: 9001064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Peer review of nursing research proposals.
    Lindquist RD; Tracy MF; Treat-Jacobson D
    Am J Crit Care; 1995 Jan; 4(1):59-65. PubMed ID: 7894558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Reviewing and understanding research reports.
    Whitney JD
    J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs; 1999 Mar; 26(2):58-9. PubMed ID: 10373860
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Top 10 Tips for Undertaking Synthesis Research.
    Knafl K; Whittemore R
    Res Nurs Health; 2017 Jun; 40(3):189-193. PubMed ID: 28267870
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Revise and resubmit: now what?
    Algase DL
    Res Theory Nurs Pract; 2014; 28(3):195-8. PubMed ID: 25929147
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The critique: a necessary part of scientific inquiry.
    Schmelzer M
    Gastroenterol Nurs; 2006; 29(4):324-5. PubMed ID: 16974173
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. In praise of peer reviewers and the peer review process.
    Peternelj-Taylor C
    J Forensic Nurs; 2010; 6(4):159-61. PubMed ID: 21114756
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Weighing up research.
    Joseph S
    Nurs Stand; 2009 Mar 18-24; 23(28):61. PubMed ID: 19400372
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Consider the source.
    Mason DJ
    Am J Nurs; 2009 Apr; 109(4):7. PubMed ID: 19325281
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Advice for authors. Four principal reasons for manuscript rejection].
    Clarke SP
    Perspect Infirm; 2006; 3(3):35-9. PubMed ID: 16480058
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The language of scholarship for novice writers.
    Freysteinson WM
    J Contin Educ Nurs; 2013 Dec; 44(12):533-4. PubMed ID: 24294894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Critiquing a research article.
    Giuffre M
    J Perianesth Nurs; 1998 Apr; 13(2):104-8. PubMed ID: 9592451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Readability in research.
    Rogers B
    AAOHN J; 1995 Apr; 43(4):220-1. PubMed ID: 7772207
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.