215 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7853282)
1. The Cell-Sweep. A new cervical cytology sampling device.
Tyau L; Hernandez E; Anderson L; Heller P; Edmonds P
J Reprod Med; 1994 Nov; 39(11):899-902. PubMed ID: 7853282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Safety, efficacy and cost of three cervical cytology sampling devices in a prenatal clinic.
Smith-Levitin M; Hernandez E; Anderson L; Heller P
J Reprod Med; 1996 Oct; 41(10):749-53. PubMed ID: 8913977
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Cervical smears following laser treatment. Comparison of Cervex brush versus Cytobrush-Ayre spatula sampling.
Szarewski A; Cuzick J; Singer A
Acta Cytol; 1991; 35(1):76-8. PubMed ID: 1994639
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The Cytobrush effect on Pap smear adequacy.
Davey-Sullivan B; Gearhart J; Evers CG; Cason Z; Replogle WH
Fam Pract Res J; 1991 Mar; 11(1):57-64. PubMed ID: 2028815
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Cervex-Brush and Cytobrush. Comparison of their ability to sample abnormal cells for cervical smears.
Hutchinson M; Fertitta L; Goldbaum B; Hamza M; Vanerian S; Isenstein L
J Reprod Med; 1991 Aug; 36(8):581-6. PubMed ID: 1941800
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Consequences of the introduction of combined spatula and Cytobrush sampling for cervical cytology. Improvements in smear quality and detection rates.
Boon ME; Alons-van Kordelaar JJ; Rietveld-Scheffers PE
Acta Cytol; 1986; 30(3):264-70. PubMed ID: 3521176
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Sampling accuracy of the modified Ayre spatula/Zelsmyr Cytobrush versus the modified Ayre spatula/bulb aspirator in the collection of cells from the uterine cervix.
Selvaggi SM; Malviya V
Diagn Cytopathol; 1991; 7(3):318-22. PubMed ID: 1879271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Improved endocervical sampling with the Cytobrush.
Chalvardjian A; De Marchi WG; Bell V; Nishikawa R
CMAJ; 1991 Feb; 144(3):313-7. PubMed ID: 1989710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Cervical cytology with the Papette sampler.
Ferenczy A; Robitaille J; Guralnick M; Shatz R
J Reprod Med; 1994 Apr; 39(4):304-10. PubMed ID: 8040849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The effectiveness and safety of two cervical cytologic techniques during pregnancy.
Stillson T; Knight AL; Elswick RK
J Fam Pract; 1997 Aug; 45(2):159-63. PubMed ID: 9267375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Papanicolaou smear adequacy: the cervical cytobrush and Ayre spatula compared with the extended-tip spatula.
Noel ML
J Am Board Fam Pract; 1989; 2(3):156-60. PubMed ID: 2665423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Controlled evaluation of implementing the Cytobrush technique to improve Papanicolaou smear quality.
Murata PJ; Johnson RA; McNicoll KE
Obstet Gynecol; 1990 Apr; 75(4):690-5. PubMed ID: 2314788
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of spatula and nonspatula methods for cervical sampling.
Rammou-Kinia R; Anagnostopoulou I; Gomousa M
Acta Cytol; 1991; 35(1):69-75. PubMed ID: 1994638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A randomized clinical trial comparing the Cytobrush and cotton swab for Papanicolaou smears.
Koonings PP; Dickinson K; d'Ablaing G; Schlaerth JB
Obstet Gynecol; 1992 Aug; 80(2):241-5. PubMed ID: 1635737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Comparison of the methods of cytobrush and Ayre spatula in the concentration of endocervical cells].
Longatto Filho A; Maeda MY; Santos DR; de Andréa Filho A; Cavaliere MJ; Shih LW; Oyafuso MS
Rev Paul Med; 1991; 109(3):93-6. PubMed ID: 1947611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Diagnostic accuracy of squamous cervical lesions studied in spatula-cytobrush smears.
Alons-van Kordelaar JJ; Boon ME
Acta Cytol; 1988; 32(6):801-4. PubMed ID: 3059733
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Simultaneous sampling of the endocervix and ectocervix using the profile brush.
Longfield JC; Grimshaw RN; Monaghan JM
Acta Cytol; 1993; 37(4):472-6. PubMed ID: 8328241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The cytobrush for evaluating routine cervicovaginal-endocervical smears.
Lai-Goldman M; Nieberg RK; Mulcahy D; Wiesmeier E
J Reprod Med; 1990 Oct; 35(10):959-63. PubMed ID: 2246763
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Efficacy of the cytobrush versus the cotton swab in the collection of endocervical cells.
Kristensen GB; Hølund B; Grinsted P
Acta Cytol; 1989; 33(6):849-51. PubMed ID: 2588918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Cytological screening--the technique of cytological specimen taking and its influence on the quality of the method].
Ivanov S
Akush Ginekol (Sofiia); 2007; 46(8):26-7. PubMed ID: 18642552
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
