These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7854817)

  • 1. Fraudulent publication.
    Flanagin A
    Orthop Nurs; 1994; 13(2):7. PubMed ID: 7854817
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Analysis and implications of retraction period and coauthorship of fraudulent publications.
    Foo JY; Tan XJ
    Account Res; 2014; 21(3):198-210. PubMed ID: 24325213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Fraudulent data in studies of postoperative pain].
    Raeder J
    Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2009 Aug; 129(16):1658-9. PubMed ID: 19721486
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Reporting research, retraction of results, and responsibility.
    Tobin MJ
    Am J Respir Crit Care Med; 2000 Sep; 162(3 Pt 1):773-4. PubMed ID: 10988078
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Retractions in the scientific literature: do authors deliberately commit research fraud?
    Steen RG
    J Med Ethics; 2011 Feb; 37(2):113-7. PubMed ID: 21081306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Update to readers and authors on ethical and scientific misconduct: retraction of the "Boldt articles".
    Miller DR
    Can J Anaesth; 2011 Sep; 58(9):777-9, 779-81. PubMed ID: 21800211
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Fraud. The journal's role concerning fraudulent research.
    Sharp DW
    Invest Radiol; 1991 Jun; 26(6):586-9. PubMed ID: 1860767
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Retracted publications in the drug literature.
    Samp JC; Schumock GT; Pickard AS
    Pharmacotherapy; 2012 Jul; 32(7):586-95. PubMed ID: 22581659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. When to retract?
    Smith R
    BMJ; 2003 Oct; 327(7420):883-4. PubMed ID: 14563721
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Investigating the previous studies of a fraudulent author.
    Smith R
    BMJ; 2005 Jul; 331(7511):288-91. PubMed ID: 16052023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Retraction notice.
    Shafer SL
    Anesth Analg; 2009 Apr; 108(4):1351. PubMed ID: 19299814
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Plagiarism is the emerged part of scientific misconduct].
    Maisonneuve H
    Ann Fr Anesth Reanim; 2013 Jan; 32(1):1-2. PubMed ID: 23246179
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The science of retraction.
    Nat Neurosci; 2002 Dec; 5(12):1249. PubMed ID: 12447375
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Authors slow to retract 'fraudulent' papers.
    Schiermeier Q
    Nature; 1998 Jun; 393(6684):402. PubMed ID: 9623989
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Foibles and peccadillos in the research environment.
    Elwood TW
    J Allied Health; 2012; 41(4):147. PubMed ID: 23224279
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Correcting the scientific record.
    Nat Chem Biol; 2008 Jul; 4(7):381. PubMed ID: 18560424
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Don't dodge retraction of fraudulent papers.
    DeCoursey TE
    Nature; 2022 Oct; 610(7930):34. PubMed ID: 36195664
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Retractions of the year.
    Nat Med; 2010 Dec; 16(12):1363. PubMed ID: 21135834
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Can we trust your data?
    Moore S
    Oncol Nurs Forum; 2011 Nov; 38(6):615. PubMed ID: 22037323
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The aftermath of scientific fraud.
    Bonetta L
    Cell; 2006 Mar; 124(5):873-5. PubMed ID: 16530031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.