These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

40 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7855496)

  • 1. [Are meta-analyses reliable?].
    Piedbois P; Buyse M
    Rev Prat; 1994 Nov; 44(18):2401-3. PubMed ID: 7855496
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Meta-analysis as a tool for gaining knowledge].
    Koch A; Ziegler S
    Med Klin (Munich); 2000 May; 95(1 Spec No):83-90. PubMed ID: 10851854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. What do the overall results of clinical trials and meta-analyses tell us about the efficacy of treatments?
    Rothwell PM
    J Nephrol; 1997; 10(1):5-6. PubMed ID: 9241618
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A graphical method for exploring heterogeneity in meta-analyses: application to a meta-analysis of 65 trials.
    Baujat B; Mahé C; Pignon JP; Hill C
    Stat Med; 2002 Sep; 21(18):2641-52. PubMed ID: 12228882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Would clinical nutrition benefit from meta-analyses and trials registers?
    Garrow JS
    Eur J Clin Nutr; 1992 Dec; 46(12):843-5. PubMed ID: 1483412
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Primer: strengths and weaknesses of meta-analysis.
    Finckh A; Tramèr MR
    Nat Clin Pract Rheumatol; 2008 Mar; 4(3):146-52. PubMed ID: 18227829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Meta-analyses to reveal insufficient mega-trials].
    Graudal NA; Galløe AM
    Ugeskr Laeger; 1998 Jun; 160(24):3574. PubMed ID: 9641048
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. How should meta-regression analyses be undertaken and interpreted?
    Thompson SG; Higgins JP
    Stat Med; 2002 Jun; 21(11):1559-73. PubMed ID: 12111920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Bias in meta-analysis and funnel plot asymmetry.
    Biljana M; Jelena M; Branislav J; Milorad R
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 1999; 68():323-8. PubMed ID: 10724898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Empirical evaluation showed that the Copas selection model provided a useful summary in 80% of meta-analyses.
    Carpenter JR; Schwarzer G; Rücker G; Künstler R
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2009 Jun; 62(6):624-631.e4. PubMed ID: 19282148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Meta-analyses--several explanations, illustrated using an example].
    Schneider M; Tramèr MR
    Praxis (Bern 1994); 1999 Dec; 88(49):2029-34. PubMed ID: 10616303
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. State of the evidence: current status and prospects of meta-analysis in infectious diseases.
    Ioannidis JP; Lau J
    Clin Infect Dis; 1999 Nov; 29(5):1178-85. PubMed ID: 10524960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Meta-analysis combining parallel and cross-over clinical trials. III: The issue of carry-over.
    Curtin F; Elbourne D; Altman DG
    Stat Med; 2002 Aug; 21(15):2161-73. PubMed ID: 12210631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Meta-analysis and meta-analytic monitoring of clinical trials.
    Feinstein AR
    Stat Med; 1996 Jun; 15(12):1273-80; discussion 1281-3. PubMed ID: 8817801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Investigating patient exclusion bias in meta-analysis.
    Tierney JF; Stewart LA
    Int J Epidemiol; 2005 Feb; 34(1):79-87. PubMed ID: 15561753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Meta-analysis of summary survival curve data.
    Arends LR; Hunink MG; Stijnen T
    Stat Med; 2008 Sep; 27(22):4381-96. PubMed ID: 18465839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Changes in clinical trials mandated by the advent of meta-analysis.
    Chalmers TC; Lau J
    Stat Med; 1996 Jun; 15(12):1263-8; discussion 1269-72. PubMed ID: 8817800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Bayesian random effects meta-analysis of trials with binary outcomes: methods for the absolute risk difference and relative risk scales.
    Warn DE; Thompson SG; Spiegelhalter DJ
    Stat Med; 2002 Jun; 21(11):1601-23. PubMed ID: 12111922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Can trial sequential monitoring boundaries reduce spurious inferences from meta-analyses?
    Thorlund K; Devereaux PJ; Wetterslev J; Guyatt G; Ioannidis JP; Thabane L; Gluud LL; Als-Nielsen B; Gluud C
    Int J Epidemiol; 2009 Feb; 38(1):276-86. PubMed ID: 18824467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management: part 6. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of observational studies.
    Manchikanti L; Datta S; Smith HS; Hirsch JA
    Pain Physician; 2009; 12(5):819-50. PubMed ID: 19787009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 2.