These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
111 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7855587)
1. Risk assessment. Agencies decry fuzzy science in bill. Stone R Science; 1995 Feb; 267(5201):1089-90. PubMed ID: 7855587 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. How much cancer can EPA regulate away? Gough M Risk Anal; 1990 Mar; 10(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 2330433 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. NEPA, EPA and risk assessment: Has EPA lost its way? Calabrese EJ Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2012 Nov; 64(2):267-8. PubMed ID: 22940525 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Risk proposals of the 103rd Congress. Paxman D Drug Metab Rev; 1996; 28(1-2):245-67. PubMed ID: 8744601 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Testimony of Assistant Administrator for Pesticides and Toxic Substances, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency before the Subcommittee on Investigations and Oversight, the Subcommittee on Natural Resources, Agriculture Research and Environment, and the Subcommittee on Science, Research and Technology of the U.S. House of Representatives Committee on Science and Technology, July 23, 1986. Moore JA Recomb DNA Tech Bull; 1986 Sep; 9(3):178-85. PubMed ID: 3786829 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. The limits of science: dioxin. Gough M Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2003 Apr; 37(2):170-1. PubMed ID: 12726750 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Republicans' bills target science at US environment agency. Jaffe S Lancet; 2015 Mar; 385(9974):1167-8. PubMed ID: 25845780 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Partnerships to protect. VanderMeer D Environ Health Perspect; 1996 Nov; 104(11):1158-60. PubMed ID: 8959403 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Symposium on integrating the science of environmental justice into decision-making at the Environmental Protection Agency: an overview. Nweke OC; Payne-Sturges D; Garcia L; Lee C; Zenick H; Grevatt P; Sanders WH; Case H; Dankwa-Mullan I Am J Public Health; 2011 Dec; 101 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S19-26. PubMed ID: 22028456 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A turnabout on EPA lead rules. Marshall E Science; 1982 Aug; 217(4561):711. PubMed ID: 7100912 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Dentistry in the 21st century: what can congress do? The lose-lose guidelines of federal regulations. Norwood C J Am Coll Dent; 1996; 63(1):7-10. PubMed ID: 8920062 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Pesticide toxicity, human subjects, and the Environmental Protection Agency's dilemma. Robertson HG; Gorovitz S J Contemp Health Law Policy; 2000; 16(2):427-58. PubMed ID: 10921235 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. A call for more science in EPA regulations. Madia WJ Science; 1998 Oct; 282(5386):45. PubMed ID: 9786793 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Polluting Developing Brains - EPA Failure on Chlorpyrifos. Rauh VA N Engl J Med; 2018 Mar; 378(13):1171-1174. PubMed ID: 29590550 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Suppression of environmental science. Kuehn RR Am J Law Med; 2004; 30(2-3):333-69. PubMed ID: 15382758 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Indoor air quality regulation: still blowin' in the wind? Healthc Hazard Mater Manage; 1991 Dec; 5(3):1-5. PubMed ID: 10116276 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Quantitative risk assessment and cost-benefit analysis for carcinogens at EPA: a critique. Perera FP J Public Health Policy; 1987; 8(2):202-21. PubMed ID: 3116042 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Lead regulation. Goldman LR Science; 1998 Dec; 282(5395):1825-7. PubMed ID: 9874633 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]