These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

333 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7855674)

  • 1. Ratings of perceived thigh and back exertion in forest workers during repetitive lifting using squat and stoop techniques.
    Hagen KB; Harms-Ringdahl K
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1994 Nov; 19(22):2511-7. PubMed ID: 7855674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Physiological and subjective responses to maximal repetitive lifting employing stoop and squat technique.
    Hagen KB; Hallén J; Harms-Ringdahl K
    Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol; 1993; 67(4):291-7. PubMed ID: 8299594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Influence of lifting technique on perceptual and cardiovascular responses to submaximal repetitive lifting.
    Hagen KB; Harms-Ringdahl K; Hallén J
    Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol; 1994; 68(6):477-82. PubMed ID: 7957138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Analysis of squat and stoop dynamic liftings: muscle forces and internal spinal loads.
    Bazrgari B; Shirazi-Adl A; Arjmand N
    Eur Spine J; 2007 May; 16(5):687-99. PubMed ID: 17103232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Influence of weight and frequency on thigh and lower-trunk motion during repetitive lifting employing stoop and squat techniques.
    Hagen K; Sørhagen O; Harms-Ringdahl K
    Clin Biomech (Bristol); 1995 Apr; 10(3):122-127. PubMed ID: 11415542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Lower extremity joint kinetics and lumbar curvature during squat and stoop lifting.
    Hwang S; Kim Y; Kim Y
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2009 Feb; 10():15. PubMed ID: 19183507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effect of semi-rigid lumbosacral orthosis use on oxygen consumption during repetitive stoop and squat lifting.
    Duplessis DH; Greenway EH; Keene KL; Lee IE; Clayton RL; Metzler T; Underwood FB
    Ergonomics; 1998 Jun; 41(6):790-7. PubMed ID: 9629064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Supporting the upper body with the hand on the thigh reduces back loading during lifting.
    Kingma I; Faber GS; van Dieën JH
    J Biomech; 2016 Apr; 49(6):881-889. PubMed ID: 26475223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The effects of quadriceps fatigue on the technique of lifting.
    Trafimow JH; Schipplein OD; Novak GJ; Andersson GB
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1993 Mar; 18(3):364-7. PubMed ID: 8475439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effects of asymmetric dynamic and isometric liftings on strength/force and rating of perceived exertion.
    Hattori Y; Ono Y; Shimaoka M; Hiruta S; Kamijima M; Shibata E; Ichihara G; Ando S; Villaneuva MB; Takeuchi Y
    Ergonomics; 1996 Jun; 39(6):862-76. PubMed ID: 8681928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effect of mental processing on low back load while lifting an object.
    Katsuhira J; Matsudaira K; Iwakiri K; Kimura Y; Ohashi T; Ono R; Sugita S; Fukuda K; Abe S; Maruyama H
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2013 Jun; 38(13):E832-9. PubMed ID: 23722573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Foot positioning instruction, initial vertical load position and lifting technique: effects on low back loading.
    Kingma I; Bosch T; Bruins L; van Dieën JH
    Ergonomics; 2004 Oct; 47(13):1365-85. PubMed ID: 15513714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. An on-body personal lift augmentation device (PLAD) reduces EMG amplitude of erector spinae during lifting tasks.
    Abdoli-E M; Agnew MJ; Stevenson JM
    Clin Biomech (Bristol); 2006 Jun; 21(5):456-65. PubMed ID: 16494978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. In vivo loads on a vertebral body replacement during different lifting techniques.
    Dreischarf M; Rohlmann A; Graichen F; Bergmann G; Schmidt H
    J Biomech; 2016 Apr; 49(6):890-895. PubMed ID: 26603872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Stoop or squat: a review of biomechanical studies on lifting technique.
    van Dieën JH; Hoozemans MJ; Toussaint HM
    Clin Biomech (Bristol); 1999 Dec; 14(10):685-96. PubMed ID: 10545622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Kinematic and sEMG Analysis of the Back Squat at Different Intensities With and Without Knee Wraps.
    Gomes WA; Brown LE; Soares EG; da Silva JJ; de O Silva FH; Serpa ÉP; Corrêa DA; Vilela Junior Gde B; Lopes CR; Marchetti PH
    J Strength Cond Res; 2015 Sep; 29(9):2482-7. PubMed ID: 25763519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Maximum acceptable weight of lift reflects peak lumbosacral extension moments in a functional capacity evaluation test using free style, stoop and squat lifting.
    Kuijer PP; van Oostrom SH; Duijzer K; van Dieën JH
    Ergonomics; 2012; 55(3):343-9. PubMed ID: 22409171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Efficiency and effectiveness of stoop and squat lifting at different frequencies.
    Welbergen E; Kemper HC; Knibbe JJ; Toussaint HM; Clysen L
    Ergonomics; 1991 May; 34(5):613-24. PubMed ID: 1884712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Impact of gender, posture and phase on back and lower extremity moments and muscle excitation during lifting task: a cross-sectional study.
    Torres RTG; Yan RX; Baek CY; Kim HD
    Acta Bioeng Biomech; 2024 Jun; 26(1):77-88. PubMed ID: 39219073
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effect of instruction, surface stability, and load intensity on trunk muscle activity.
    Bressel E; Willardson JM; Thompson B; Fontana FE
    J Electromyogr Kinesiol; 2009 Dec; 19(6):e500-4. PubMed ID: 19054687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.