These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

205 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7856562)

  • 1. Interobserver reproducibility of the Nottingham modification of the Bloom and Richardson histologic grading scheme for infiltrating ductal carcinoma.
    Frierson HF; Wolber RA; Berean KW; Franquemont DW; Gaffey MJ; Boyd JC; Wilbur DC
    Am J Clin Pathol; 1995 Feb; 103(2):195-8. PubMed ID: 7856562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Interobserver agreement of the Nottingham histologic grading scheme for infiltrating duct carcinoma breast.
    Sikka M; Agarwal S; Bhatia A
    Indian J Cancer; 1999; 36(2-4):149-53. PubMed ID: 10921219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Breast carcinoma malignancy grading by Bloom-Richardson system vs proliferation index: reproducibility of grade and advantages of proliferation index.
    Meyer JS; Alvarez C; Milikowski C; Olson N; Russo I; Russo J; Glass A; Zehnbauer BA; Lister K; Parwaresch R;
    Mod Pathol; 2005 Aug; 18(8):1067-78. PubMed ID: 15920556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Quantitative image cytometry of infiltrating ductal carcinoma: comparison with prognostic parameters and reproducibility of histological grade.
    Frierson HF; Wilbur DC; Gaffey MJ; Salmon I; Franquemont DW; Berean KW; Wolber RA; Kiss R
    Hum Pathol; 1996 Aug; 27(8):821-6. PubMed ID: 8760017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Histologic grading of invasive lobular carcinoma: does use of a 2-tiered nuclear grading system improve interobserver variability?
    Adams AL; Chhieng DC; Bell WC; Winokur T; Hameed O
    Ann Diagn Pathol; 2009 Aug; 13(4):223-5. PubMed ID: 19608079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Application of the Scarff-Bloom-Richardson tumor grading system to fine-needle aspirates of the breast.
    Howell LP; Gandour-Edwards R; O'Sullivan D
    Am J Clin Pathol; 1994 Mar; 101(3):262-5. PubMed ID: 8135179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Histological grading of breast carcinomas: a study of interobserver agreement.
    Robbins P; Pinder S; de Klerk N; Dawkins H; Harvey J; Sterrett G; Ellis I; Elston C
    Hum Pathol; 1995 Aug; 26(8):873-9. PubMed ID: 7635449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Grading invasive ductal carcinoma of the breast: advantages of using automated proliferation index instead of mitotic count.
    Tawfik O; Kimler BF; Davis M; Stasik C; Lai SM; Mayo MS; Fan F; Donahue JK; Damjanov I; Thomas P; Connor C; Jewell WR; Smith H; Fabian CJ
    Virchows Arch; 2007 Jun; 450(6):627-36. PubMed ID: 17458558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Assessment of proliferative activity in breast cancer: MIB-1 immunohistochemistry versus mitotic figure count.
    Lehr HA; Hansen DA; Kussick S; Li M; Hwang H; Krummenauer F; Trouet S; Gown AM
    Hum Pathol; 1999 Nov; 30(11):1314-20. PubMed ID: 10571511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Histologic grading of breast carcinoma: a multi-institution study of interobserver variation using virtual microscopy.
    Ginter PS; Idress R; D'Alfonso TM; Fineberg S; Jaffer S; Sattar AK; Chagpar A; Wilson P; Harigopal M
    Mod Pathol; 2021 Apr; 34(4):701-709. PubMed ID: 33077923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Correlation of histologic grade of breast carcinoma with cytologic features on fine-needle aspiration of the breast.
    Ducatman BS; Emery ST; Wang HH
    Mod Pathol; 1993 Sep; 6(5):539-43. PubMed ID: 8248109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Interobserver reproducibility of the Lagios nuclear grading system for ductal carcinoma in situ.
    Sneige N; Lagios MD; Schwarting R; Colburn W; Atkinson E; Weber D; Sahin A; Kemp B; Hoque A; Risin S; Sabichi A; Boone C; Dhingra K; Kelloff G; Lippman S
    Hum Pathol; 1999 Mar; 30(3):257-62. PubMed ID: 10088542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Grade and flow cytometric analysis of ploidy for infiltrating ductal carcinomas.
    Frierson HF
    Hum Pathol; 1993 Jan; 24(1):24-9. PubMed ID: 8380276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Cytologic nuclear grade of malignant breast aspirates as a predictor of histologic grade. Light microscopy and image analysis characteristics.
    Moroz K; Lipscomb J; Vial LJ; Dhurandhar N
    Acta Cytol; 1997; 41(4):1107-11. PubMed ID: 9250307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Terminal uridine nick end labelling and mitosis in breast carcinoma. Correlation with tumor grade and p53 overexpression.
    Dey P; Luthra UK; George SS; Haji BI; George J
    Anal Quant Cytol Histol; 2001 Feb; 23(1):27-30. PubMed ID: 11233740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Concordance in Breast Cancer Grading by Artificial Intelligence on Whole Slide Images Compares With a Multi-Institutional Cohort of Breast Pathologists.
    Mantrala S; Ginter PS; Mitkari A; Joshi S; Prabhala H; Ramachandra V; Kini L; Idress R; D'Alfonso TM; Fineberg S; Jaffer S; Sattar AK; Chagpar AB; Wilson P; Singh K; Harigopal M; Koka D
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2022 Nov; 146(11):1369-1377. PubMed ID: 35271701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Histologic grading of breast carcinoma. A reproducibility study.
    Dalton LW; Page DL; Dupont WD
    Cancer; 1994 Jun; 73(11):2765-70. PubMed ID: 8194018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A newly proposed semi-automated method of grading invasive lobular carcinoma: a unifying concept and correlation with prognostic markers and patient survival.
    Stevens E; Kimler BF; Davis MK; Fan F; Thomas P; Wang XY; Damjanov I; Tawfik OW
    Ann Clin Lab Sci; 2009; 39(1):25-31. PubMed ID: 19201737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Quantification of tumor cellularity and mitotic index in invasive ductal carcinoma of the breast.
    Sağol O; Culhaci N; Yörükoğlu K; Ozen E; Canda T
    Anal Quant Cytol Histol; 2001 Feb; 23(1):21-6. PubMed ID: 11233739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Tumor architecture exerts no bias on nuclear grading in breast cancer diagnosis.
    Mora B; Bombari D; Schaefer SC; Schmidt M; Delaloye JF; Mast F; Lehr HA
    Virchows Arch; 2012 Oct; 461(4):399-403. PubMed ID: 22936350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.