207 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7856562)
1. Interobserver reproducibility of the Nottingham modification of the Bloom and Richardson histologic grading scheme for infiltrating ductal carcinoma.
Frierson HF; Wolber RA; Berean KW; Franquemont DW; Gaffey MJ; Boyd JC; Wilbur DC
Am J Clin Pathol; 1995 Feb; 103(2):195-8. PubMed ID: 7856562
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Interobserver agreement of the Nottingham histologic grading scheme for infiltrating duct carcinoma breast.
Sikka M; Agarwal S; Bhatia A
Indian J Cancer; 1999; 36(2-4):149-53. PubMed ID: 10921219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Breast carcinoma malignancy grading by Bloom-Richardson system vs proliferation index: reproducibility of grade and advantages of proliferation index.
Meyer JS; Alvarez C; Milikowski C; Olson N; Russo I; Russo J; Glass A; Zehnbauer BA; Lister K; Parwaresch R;
Mod Pathol; 2005 Aug; 18(8):1067-78. PubMed ID: 15920556
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Quantitative image cytometry of infiltrating ductal carcinoma: comparison with prognostic parameters and reproducibility of histological grade.
Frierson HF; Wilbur DC; Gaffey MJ; Salmon I; Franquemont DW; Berean KW; Wolber RA; Kiss R
Hum Pathol; 1996 Aug; 27(8):821-6. PubMed ID: 8760017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Histologic grading of invasive lobular carcinoma: does use of a 2-tiered nuclear grading system improve interobserver variability?
Adams AL; Chhieng DC; Bell WC; Winokur T; Hameed O
Ann Diagn Pathol; 2009 Aug; 13(4):223-5. PubMed ID: 19608079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Application of the Scarff-Bloom-Richardson tumor grading system to fine-needle aspirates of the breast.
Howell LP; Gandour-Edwards R; O'Sullivan D
Am J Clin Pathol; 1994 Mar; 101(3):262-5. PubMed ID: 8135179
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Histological grading of breast carcinomas: a study of interobserver agreement.
Robbins P; Pinder S; de Klerk N; Dawkins H; Harvey J; Sterrett G; Ellis I; Elston C
Hum Pathol; 1995 Aug; 26(8):873-9. PubMed ID: 7635449
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Grading invasive ductal carcinoma of the breast: advantages of using automated proliferation index instead of mitotic count.
Tawfik O; Kimler BF; Davis M; Stasik C; Lai SM; Mayo MS; Fan F; Donahue JK; Damjanov I; Thomas P; Connor C; Jewell WR; Smith H; Fabian CJ
Virchows Arch; 2007 Jun; 450(6):627-36. PubMed ID: 17458558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Assessment of proliferative activity in breast cancer: MIB-1 immunohistochemistry versus mitotic figure count.
Lehr HA; Hansen DA; Kussick S; Li M; Hwang H; Krummenauer F; Trouet S; Gown AM
Hum Pathol; 1999 Nov; 30(11):1314-20. PubMed ID: 10571511
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Histologic grading of breast carcinoma: a multi-institution study of interobserver variation using virtual microscopy.
Ginter PS; Idress R; D'Alfonso TM; Fineberg S; Jaffer S; Sattar AK; Chagpar A; Wilson P; Harigopal M
Mod Pathol; 2021 Apr; 34(4):701-709. PubMed ID: 33077923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Correlation of histologic grade of breast carcinoma with cytologic features on fine-needle aspiration of the breast.
Ducatman BS; Emery ST; Wang HH
Mod Pathol; 1993 Sep; 6(5):539-43. PubMed ID: 8248109
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Interobserver reproducibility of the Lagios nuclear grading system for ductal carcinoma in situ.
Sneige N; Lagios MD; Schwarting R; Colburn W; Atkinson E; Weber D; Sahin A; Kemp B; Hoque A; Risin S; Sabichi A; Boone C; Dhingra K; Kelloff G; Lippman S
Hum Pathol; 1999 Mar; 30(3):257-62. PubMed ID: 10088542
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Grade and flow cytometric analysis of ploidy for infiltrating ductal carcinomas.
Frierson HF
Hum Pathol; 1993 Jan; 24(1):24-9. PubMed ID: 8380276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Cytologic nuclear grade of malignant breast aspirates as a predictor of histologic grade. Light microscopy and image analysis characteristics.
Moroz K; Lipscomb J; Vial LJ; Dhurandhar N
Acta Cytol; 1997; 41(4):1107-11. PubMed ID: 9250307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Terminal uridine nick end labelling and mitosis in breast carcinoma. Correlation with tumor grade and p53 overexpression.
Dey P; Luthra UK; George SS; Haji BI; George J
Anal Quant Cytol Histol; 2001 Feb; 23(1):27-30. PubMed ID: 11233740
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Concordance in Breast Cancer Grading by Artificial Intelligence on Whole Slide Images Compares With a Multi-Institutional Cohort of Breast Pathologists.
Mantrala S; Ginter PS; Mitkari A; Joshi S; Prabhala H; Ramachandra V; Kini L; Idress R; D'Alfonso TM; Fineberg S; Jaffer S; Sattar AK; Chagpar AB; Wilson P; Singh K; Harigopal M; Koka D
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2022 Nov; 146(11):1369-1377. PubMed ID: 35271701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Histologic grading of breast carcinoma. A reproducibility study.
Dalton LW; Page DL; Dupont WD
Cancer; 1994 Jun; 73(11):2765-70. PubMed ID: 8194018
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A newly proposed semi-automated method of grading invasive lobular carcinoma: a unifying concept and correlation with prognostic markers and patient survival.
Stevens E; Kimler BF; Davis MK; Fan F; Thomas P; Wang XY; Damjanov I; Tawfik OW
Ann Clin Lab Sci; 2009; 39(1):25-31. PubMed ID: 19201737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Quantification of tumor cellularity and mitotic index in invasive ductal carcinoma of the breast.
Sağol O; Culhaci N; Yörükoğlu K; Ozen E; Canda T
Anal Quant Cytol Histol; 2001 Feb; 23(1):21-6. PubMed ID: 11233739
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Tumor architecture exerts no bias on nuclear grading in breast cancer diagnosis.
Mora B; Bombari D; Schaefer SC; Schmidt M; Delaloye JF; Mast F; Lehr HA
Virchows Arch; 2012 Oct; 461(4):399-403. PubMed ID: 22936350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
