These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

109 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7856774)

  • 1. Annotation: protection of the public interest, allegations of scientific misconduct, and the Needleman case.
    Silbergeld EK
    Am J Public Health; 1995 Feb; 85(2):165-6. PubMed ID: 7856774
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The lead debate.
    Mushak P
    Pediatrics; 1993 Apr; 91(4):856-7. PubMed ID: 8464690
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Historical model for editor and Office of Research Integrity cooperation in handling allegations, investigation, and retraction in a contentious (Abbs) case of research misconduct.
    Price AR; Daroff RB
    Account Res; 2015; 22(2):63-80. PubMed ID: 25397599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Trouble for Healy over misconduct office.
    Aldhous P
    Nature; 1991 Aug; 352(6334):361. PubMed ID: 1650429
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. New evidence emerges in Tufts misconduct case.
    Anderson C
    Nature; 1990 Sep; 347(6291):317. PubMed ID: 2170844
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Research misconduct and its federal regulation: the origin and history of the Office of Research Integrity--with personal views by ORI's former associate director for investigative oversight.
    Price AR
    Account Res; 2013; 20(5-6):291-319. PubMed ID: 24028479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Standing up to the lead industry: an interview with Herbert Needleman. Interview by David Rosner and Gerald Markowitz.
    Needleman H
    Public Health Rep; 2005; 120(3):330-7. PubMed ID: 16134577
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Of whistleblowers, investigators, and judges.
    Scarr S; Ernhart CB
    Ethics Behav; 1993; 3(2):199-206. PubMed ID: 11652255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Gallo on the rack.
    Nature; 1993 Jan; 361(6407):1. PubMed ID: 8380624
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Scientific misconduct. NIH staffer finds warm reception on other side.
    Anderson C
    Nature; 1992 Jan; 355(6356):98. PubMed ID: 1309600
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Improving the scientific misconduct hearing process.
    Parrish DM
    JAMA; 1997 Apr 23-30; 277(16):1315-9. PubMed ID: 9109472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Bridges committee procedures.
    Bradshaw RA; Adler AJ; Chytil F; Goldberg ND; Litman BJ
    Science; 1990 Nov; 250(4981):611. PubMed ID: 2173136
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The Dingell hearings on scientific misconduct. Blunt instruments indeed.
    Healy B
    N Engl J Med; 1993 Sep; 329(10):725-7. PubMed ID: 8393964
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Anonymous poison pen letters vs allegations of scientific misconduct.
    Price AR
    Acad Med; 1998 Oct; 73(10):1027-8. PubMed ID: 9795611
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Misconduct charges against Gallo withdrawn after Popovic decision.
    Culliton BJ
    Nature; 1993 Nov; 366(6452):191. PubMed ID: 8232569
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Blood lead levels, scientific misconduct, and the Needleman case. 1. A reply from the lead industry.
    Smith JF
    Am J Public Health; 1996 Jan; 86(1):112; author reply 114-5. PubMed ID: 8561229
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Popovic wins appeal against ORI charges.
    Culliton BJ
    Nature; 1993 Nov; 366(6451):99. PubMed ID: 8232566
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Blood lead levels, scientific misconduct and the Needleman case. 2. The critics' arguments.
    Schoen EJ
    Am J Public Health; 1996 Jan; 86(1):112-3; author reply 114-5. PubMed ID: 8561230
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Blood lead levels, scientific misconduct and the Needleman case. 3. A reply from Scarr and Ernhart.
    Scarr S; Ernhart CB
    Am J Public Health; 1996 Jan; 86(1):113-4; author reply 114-5. PubMed ID: 8561231
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. More woes for Gallo.
    Hamilton DP
    Science; 1991 Jan; 251(4990):152. PubMed ID: 1846241
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.