These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

106 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7856946)

  • 1. Evaluation of the ATB 32C, automicrobic system and API 20C using clinical yeast isolates.
    Gutierrez J; Martin E; Lozano C; Coronilla J; Nogales C
    Ann Biol Clin (Paris); 1994; 52(6):443-6. PubMed ID: 7856946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of updated Vitek Yeast Biochemical Card and API 20C yeast identification systems.
    Fenn JP; Segal H; Barland B; Denton D; Whisenant J; Chun H; Christofferson K; Hamilton L; Carroll K
    J Clin Microbiol; 1994 May; 32(5):1184-7. PubMed ID: 8051243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Comparison of methods for the identification of the most common yeasts in the clinical microbiology laboratory].
    Guelfand L; Grisolía P; Bozzano C; Kaufman S
    Rev Argent Microbiol; 2003; 35(1):49-53. PubMed ID: 12833681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of the Quantum II, API Yeast Ident, and AutoMicrobic systems for identification of clinical yeast isolates.
    Pfaller MA; Preston T; Bale M; Koontz FP; Body BA
    J Clin Microbiol; 1988 Oct; 26(10):2054-8. PubMed ID: 3182994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluation of API ID 32C and VITEK-2 to identify Candida dubliniensis.
    Cárdenes-Perera CD; Torres-Lana A; Alonso-Vargas R; Moragues-Tosantas MD; Pontón-San Emeterio J; Quindós-Andrés G; Arévalo-Morales MP
    Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis; 2004 Nov; 50(3):219-21. PubMed ID: 15541609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of the API ATB 32C system for the rapid identification of foodborne yeasts.
    Rohm H; Lechner F; Lehner M
    Int J Food Microbiol; 1990 Dec; 11(3-4):215-23. PubMed ID: 2282283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Misidentification of clinical yeast isolates by using the updated Vitek Yeast Biochemical Card.
    Dooley DP; Beckius ML; Jeffrey BS
    J Clin Microbiol; 1994 Dec; 32(12):2889-92. PubMed ID: 7883873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Research on rapid identification of auto-microbiology system for pathogenic yeast.
    Liao WQ; Zhao ZQ; Zhao H
    Chin Med J (Engl); 1992 Apr; 105(4):319-21. PubMed ID: 1618016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of the SIM, API 20C, and ID 32C Systems for Identification of Yeasts Isolated from Fruit Juice Concentrates and Beverages.
    Deak T; Beuchat LR
    J Food Prot; 1993 Jul; 56(7):585-592. PubMed ID: 31113036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Auxacolor, a new commercial system for yeast identification: evaluation of 182 strains comparatively with ID 32C.
    Fricker-Hidalgo H; Lebeau B; Kervroedan P; Faure O; Ambroise-Thomas P; Grillot R
    Ann Biol Clin (Paris); 1995; 53(4):221-5. PubMed ID: 7574109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Evaluation of common commercial systems for the identification of yeast isolates in microbiology laboratories: a multicenter study].
    Karabıçak N; Uludağ Altun H; Karatuna O; Hazırolan G; Aksu N; Adiloğlu A; Akyar I
    Mikrobiyol Bul; 2015 Apr; 49(2):210-20. PubMed ID: 26167821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of three commercial systems for identification of yeasts commonly isolated in the clinical microbiology laboratory.
    Wadlin JK; Hanko G; Stewart R; Pape J; Nachamkin I
    J Clin Microbiol; 1999 Jun; 37(6):1967-70. PubMed ID: 10325356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A comparison of methods for yeast identification including CHROMagar Candida, Vitek system YBC and a traditional biochemical method.
    Huang LU; Chen CH; Chou CF; Lu JJ; Chi WM; Lee WH
    Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi (Taipei); 2001 Oct; 64(10):568-74. PubMed ID: 11791943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparative study of seven commercial yeast identification systems.
    Verweij PE; Breuker IM; Rijs AJ; Meis JF
    J Clin Pathol; 1999 Apr; 52(4):271-3. PubMed ID: 10474518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Performance of yeast identification systems. An analysis of the College of American Pathologists Special Mycology Survey data.
    Fuchs PC; Dolan CT
    Am J Clin Pathol; 1982 Oct; 78(4 Suppl):664-7. PubMed ID: 7137107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Identification of yeast-like fungi: evaluation of 4 commercial systems].
    Russolo S; Sala A; Crotti D
    Quad Sclavo Diagn; 1984 Dec; 20(4):372-8. PubMed ID: 6399580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Efficacy of API 20C and ID 32C systems for identification of common and rare clinical yeast isolates.
    Ramani R; Gromadzki S; Pincus DH; Salkin IF; Chaturvedi V
    J Clin Microbiol; 1998 Nov; 36(11):3396-8. PubMed ID: 9774605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluation of a multitest microtechnique for yeast identification.
    Miller RE; Lu LP
    Am J Med Technol; 1976 Jul; 42(7):238-42. PubMed ID: 945942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Usefulness of the CHROM-agar Candida culture medium in the differentiation and presumed identification of yeast of clinical interest].
    García-Martos P; Mira-Gutiérrez J; Galán-Sánchez F; Hernández-Molina JM
    Enferm Infecc Microbiol Clin; 1997 Feb; 15(2):70-2. PubMed ID: 9101749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Automated method for yeast identification: ATB 32 C].
    Hernández-Molina JM; Coque MT; Campos E; Rando C; Leiva EF
    Enferm Infecc Microbiol Clin; 1992 May; 10(5):293-5. PubMed ID: 1391001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.