These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

103 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7858301)

  • 1. Test-retest reliability of high-frequency thresholds at bedside with sensorineural hearing-impaired listeners.
    Sinks BC; Goebel JA
    J Am Acad Audiol; 1994 Nov; 5(6):399-401. PubMed ID: 7858301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Extended High-Frequency Smartphone Audiometry: Validity and Reliability.
    Bornman M; Swanepoel W; De Jager LB; Eikelboom RH
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2019 Mar; 30(3):217-226. PubMed ID: 30461416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. High-frequency pure-tone audiometry in children: a test-retest reliability study relative to ototoxic criteria.
    Beahan N; Kei J; Driscoll C; Charles B; Khan A
    Ear Hear; 2012; 33(1):104-11. PubMed ID: 21760512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Pure-Tone Audiometry With Forward Pressure Level Calibration Leads to Clinically-Relevant Improvements in Test-Retest Reliability.
    Lapsley Miller JA; Reed CM; Robinson SR; Perez ZD
    Ear Hear; 2018; 39(5):946-957. PubMed ID: 29470259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Reliability of computer-automated hearing thresholds in cochlear-impaired listeners using ER-4B Canal Phone earphones.
    Henry JA; Flick CL; Gilbert A; Ellingson RM; Fausti SA
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 2003; 40(3):253-64. PubMed ID: 14582529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Development and Validation of a Portable Hearing Self-Testing System Based on a Notebook Personal Computer.
    Liu Y; Yang D; Xiong F; Yu L; Ji F; Wang QJ
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2015 Sep; 26(8):716-723. PubMed ID: 26333879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. High-frequency thresholds: sound suite versus hospital room.
    Valente M; Potts LG; Valente M; French-St George M; Goebel J
    J Am Acad Audiol; 1992 Jul; 3(4):287-94. PubMed ID: 1421462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Hearing assessment-reliability, accuracy, and efficiency of automated audiometry.
    Swanepoel de W; Mngemane S; Molemong S; Mkwanazi H; Tutshini S
    Telemed J E Health; 2010 Jun; 16(5):557-63. PubMed ID: 20575723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Reliability in warble-tone sound field audiometry.
    Arlinger SD; Jerlvall LB
    Scand Audiol; 1987; 16(1):21-7. PubMed ID: 3589476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Reliability of threshold estimation in hearing-impaired adults using the AMFR.
    Chambers RD; Meyer TA
    J Am Acad Audiol; 1993 Jan; 4(1):22-32. PubMed ID: 8422480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. ABR thresholds to tonebursts gated with Blackman and linear windows in adults with high-frequency sensorineural hearing loss.
    Purdy SC; Abbas PJ
    Ear Hear; 2002 Aug; 23(4):358-68. PubMed ID: 12195178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Identification of conductive hearing loss using air conduction tests alone: reliability and validity of an automatic test battery.
    Convery E; Keidser G; Seeto M; Freeston K; Zhou D; Dillon H
    Ear Hear; 2014; 35(1):e1-8. PubMed ID: 24080948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Verification of in situ thresholds and integrated real-ear measurements.
    Digiovanni JJ; Pratt RM
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2010; 21(10):663-70. PubMed ID: 21376007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Hearing thresholds for speech using insert earphones versus supra-aural earphones.
    Arlinger SD; Billermark E
    Scand Audiol; 1997; 26(3):151-4. PubMed ID: 9309810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. High-frequency thresholds: circumaural earphone versus insert earphone.
    Valente M; Valente M; Goebel J
    J Am Acad Audiol; 1992 Nov; 3(6):410-8. PubMed ID: 1486204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of auditory steady-state responses and auditory brainstem responses in audiometric assessment of adults with sensorineural hearing loss.
    Lin YH; Ho HC; Wu HP
    Auris Nasus Larynx; 2009 Apr; 36(2):140-5. PubMed ID: 18620826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Clinical applicability of insert earphones for audiometry.
    Borton TE; Nolen BL; Luks SB; Meline NC
    Audiology; 1989; 28(2):61-70. PubMed ID: 2930364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A version of the TEN Test for use with ER-3A insert earphones.
    Moore BC; Creeke S; Glasberg BR; Stone MA; Sek A
    Ear Hear; 2012; 33(4):554-7. PubMed ID: 22436409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Validation of multi-channel auditory steady-state response in adults with sensorineural hearing loss.
    Lin YH; Chen PR; Hsu CJ; Wu HP
    J Laryngol Otol; 2009 Jan; 123(1):38-44. PubMed ID: 18452631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluation of insert earphones for high-frequency bedside ototoxicity monitoring.
    Gordon JS; Phillips DS; Helt WJ; Konrad-Martin D; Fausti SA
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 2005; 42(3):353-61. PubMed ID: 16187247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.