142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7858787)
1. Effect of suturing on the mechanical properties of bovine pericardium--implications for cardiac valve bioprosthesis.
Lim KO; Cheong KC
Med Eng Phys; 1994 Nov; 16(6):526-30. PubMed ID: 7858787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Influence of the selection of the suture material on the mechanical behavior of a biomaterial to be employed in the construction of implants. Part 1: Calf pericardium.
García Páez JM; Carrera A; Herrero EJ; Millán I; Rocha A; Cordón A; Sainz N; Mendez J; Castillo-Olivares JL
J Biomater Appl; 2001 Jul; 16(1):47-67. PubMed ID: 11475359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Resistance and stability of a new method for bonding biological materials using sutures and biological adhesives.
Paéz JM; Sanmartín AC; Herrero EJ; Millan I; Cordon A; Rocha A; Maestro MA; Téllez G; Castillo-Olivares JL
J Biomater Appl; 2005 Jan; 19(3):215-36. PubMed ID: 15613381
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of tensile properties of xenopericardium from three animal species and finite element analysis for bioprosthetic heart valve tissue.
Rassoli A; Fatouraee N; Guidoin R; Zhang Z
Artif Organs; 2020 Mar; 44(3):278-287. PubMed ID: 31386771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Ostrich pericardium, a biomaterial for the construction of valve leaflets for cardiac bioprostheses: mechanical behaviour, selection and interaction with suture materials.
Páez JM; Jorge-Herrero E; Carrera A; Millán I; Rocha A; Calero P; Cordón A; Sainz N; Castillo-Olivares JL
Biomaterials; 2001 Oct; 22(20):2731-40. PubMed ID: 11545307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effect of the suture on the durability of bovine pericardium used in cardiac bioprostheses.
García Paez JM; Carrera San Martín A; Jorge-Herrero E; Millán I; Navidad R; Candela I; García Sestafe JV; Castillo-Olivares JL
Biomaterials; 1994 Feb; 15(3):172-6. PubMed ID: 8199289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Influence of the selection of the suture material on the mechanical behavior of a biomaterial to be employed in the construction of implants. Part 2: Porcine pericardium.
García Páez JM; Carrera A; Herrero EJ; Millán I; Rocha A; Cordón A; Sainz N; Mendez J; Castillo-Olivares JL
J Biomater Appl; 2001 Jul; 16(1):68-90. PubMed ID: 11475360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Resistance to tearing of calf and ostrich pericardium: Influence of the type of suture material and the direction of the suture line.
Páez JM; Carrera A; Jorge E; Millán I; Cordon A; Maestro MA; Rocha A; Castillo-Olivares JL
J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater; 2004 May; 69(2):125-34. PubMed ID: 15116401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Orthotropic mechanical properties of chemically treated bovine pericardium.
Sacks MS; Chuong CJ
Ann Biomed Eng; 1998; 26(5):892-902. PubMed ID: 9779962
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The telescoping suture--Part 1: Does this technique improve the mechanical behavior of a biomaterial?: Calf pericardium.
García Páez JM; Jorge Herrero E; Rocha A; Martín-Maestro M; Castillo-Olivares JL; Millán I; Carrera Sanmartín A; Cordón A
J Biomater Appl; 2002 Oct; 17(2):85-103. PubMed ID: 12557996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The tensile strength of natural and chemically modified bovine pericardium.
Crofts CE; Trowbridge EA
J Biomed Mater Res; 1988 Feb; 22(2):89-98. PubMed ID: 3128550
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Anisotropic elasticity and strength of glutaraldehyde fixed bovine pericardium for use in pericardial bioprosthetic valves.
Zioupos P; Barbenel JC; Fisher J
J Biomed Mater Res; 1994 Jan; 28(1):49-57. PubMed ID: 8126028
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Anisotropic elasticity of bovine pericardial tissues.
Radjeman A; Liew SC; Lim KO
Jpn J Physiol; 1985; 35(5):831-40. PubMed ID: 4079137
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Donkey pericardium as an alternative bioprosthetic heart valve material.
Chen S; Xu L; Liu Y; Li Q; Wang D; Wang X; Liu T
Artif Organs; 2013 Mar; 37(3):248-55. PubMed ID: 23145868
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Structural Model for Viscoelastic Properties of Pericardial Bioprosthetic Valves.
Rassoli A; Fatouraee N; Guidoin R
Artif Organs; 2018 Jun; 42(6):630-639. PubMed ID: 29602267
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Biaxial mechanical/structural effects of equibiaxial strain during crosslinking of bovine pericardial xenograft materials.
Langdon SE; Chernecky R; Pereira CA; Abdulla D; Lee JM
Biomaterials; 1999 Jan; 20(2):137-53. PubMed ID: 10022783
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Mechanical properties and histology of charge modified bioprosthetic tissue resistant to calcification.
Golomb G; Lewinstein I; Ezra V; Schoen FJ
Biomaterials; 1992; 13(6):353-6. PubMed ID: 1610958
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Pericardial heterografts: a comparative study of suture pull-out and tissue strength.
Trowbridge EA; Lawford PV; Crofts CE
J Biomed Eng; 1989 Jul; 11(4):311-4. PubMed ID: 2755111
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Mechanical behavior of chemically treated ostrich pericardium subjected to uniaxial tensile testing: influence of the suture.
García Páez JM; Carrera A; Herrero EJ; Millán I; Rocha A; Cordón A; Téllez G; Maestro M; Calero P; Castillo-Olivares JL
J Biomed Mater Res; 2002 Oct; 62(1):73-81. PubMed ID: 12124788
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Flexible bioprosthetic pericardial heart valve.
Ross DN
Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1980 Apr; 28(2):150-2. PubMed ID: 6156502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
