These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 785997)

  • 1. Limitations of the computer in electrocardiographic interpretation.
    Caceres CA
    Am J Cardiol; 1976 Sep; 38(3):362-76. PubMed ID: 785997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Development and performance of Mayo-IBM electrocardiographic computer analysis programs (V70).
    Hu KC; Francis DB; Gau GT; Smith RE
    Mayo Clin Proc; 1973 Apr; 48(4):260-8. PubMed ID: 4266427
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Diagnostic accuracy of a 15-lead hybrid computer-aided electrocardiographic system.
    Talbot S; Dreifus LS; Watanabe Y; Reich M; Chiang R; Morris K
    Eur J Cardiol; 1973 Sep; 1(1):29-39. PubMed ID: 4618198
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Electrocardiographic automation.
    Caceres CA
    G Ital Cardiol; 1974; 4(1):1-14. PubMed ID: 4604417
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Computer-based interpretation of ECG--guiding or misleading?].
    Morisbak B; Gjesdal K
    Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 1999 Sep; 119(23):3441-4. PubMed ID: 10553343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Computer interpretation of electrocardiograms and vectorcardiograms.
    Enderle J; Telerman M; Pordy L; Chesky K; Jaffe H
    Adv Cardiol; 1976; 16():194-202. PubMed ID: 775912
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Will the electrocardiograph replace the electrocardiographer?
    Rautaharju PM
    J Electrocardiol; 1993; 26 Suppl():158-63. PubMed ID: 8189120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Common electrocardiographic artifacts mimicking arrhythmias in ambulatory monitoring.
    Márquez MF; Colín L; Guevara M; Iturralde P; Hermosillo AG
    Am Heart J; 2002 Aug; 144(2):187-97. PubMed ID: 12177632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluation of computerized electrocardiographic interpretations in a community hospital.
    Pryor WW; Blackhurst DW; Gates K; Wagner GS
    J S C Med Assoc; 1995 Mar; 91(3):105-11. PubMed ID: 7739204
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Does a computer-based ECG-recorder interpret electrocardiograms more efficiently than physicians?
    Jakobsson A; Ohlin P; Pahlm O
    Clin Physiol; 1985 Oct; 5(5):417-23. PubMed ID: 3902333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Computer search for electrocardiographic lead directions to optimize diagnostic differentiation. A novel concept in electrocardiographic lead design.
    Batchlor CD; Berson AS; Naval IA; Pipberger HV
    Circulation; 1967 Aug; 36(2):320-30. PubMed ID: 4283640
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Electrocardiographic diagnosis obtained with computer analysis].
    Bigalli A; Dalli G; Puccini E; Sicca GT
    Boll Soc Ital Cardiol; 1978; 23(3):606-13. PubMed ID: 380600
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Progress of automatic analysis of electrocardiograms and vectorcardiograms by computer (20,019 tracings)].
    Enderle J; Telerman M
    Acta Cardiol; 1973 Jun; 28(6):576-92. PubMed ID: 4590434
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Computer-assisted ECG evaluation in polyclinic patients].
    Koenig W; Witzleb EJ; Khatibnia U
    Fortschr Med; 1981 Jun; 99(24):934-6. PubMed ID: 7021376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Computer-aided electrocardiography.
    Sheffield LT
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 1987 Aug; 10(2):448-55. PubMed ID: 3298364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A method for evaluating computer programs for electrocardiographic interpretation. 3. Reproducibility testing and the sources of program errors.
    Bailey JJ; Horton M; Itscoitz SB
    Circulation; 1974 Jul; 50(1):88-93. PubMed ID: 4276020
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Improvement of automated electrocardiographic diagnosis by combination of computer interpretations of the electrocardiogram and vectorcardiogram.
    Kors JA; van Herpen G; Willems JL; van Bemmel JH
    Am J Cardiol; 1992 Jul; 70(1):96-9. PubMed ID: 1615877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Comparison of 3 ECG computer programs with interpretation by physicians].
    Saner H; Lindeland A; Scallen R; Paule W; Lange HW; Gobel FL
    Schweiz Med Wochenschr; 1987 Jul; 117(27-28):1035-9. PubMed ID: 3303319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The concepts of sensitivity, specificity and accuracy in evaluation of electrocardiographic, vectorcardiographic and polarcardiographic criteria.
    Rautaharju PM; Blackburn HW; Warren JW
    J Electrocardiol; 1976; 9(3):275-81. PubMed ID: 781162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A new user-oriented electrocardiographic program.
    Caceres CA
    G Ital Cardiol; 1975; 5(2):272-8. PubMed ID: 1102375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.