These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

85 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7860087)

  • 1. Estimating the frequency of nonpaternity in Switzerland.
    Sasse G; Müller H; Chakraborty R; Ott J
    Hum Hered; 1994; 44(6):337-43. PubMed ID: 7860087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Estimating the prevalence of nonpaternity in Germany.
    Wolf M; Musch J; Enczmann J; Fischer J
    Hum Nat; 2012 Jun; 23(2):208-17. PubMed ID: 22688803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluating pedigree data. I. The estimation of pedigree error in the presence of marker mistyping.
    Lathrop GM; Hooper AB; Huntsman JW; Ward RH
    Am J Hum Genet; 1983 Mar; 35(2):241-62. PubMed ID: 6573130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Estimation of nonpaternity in the Mexican population of Nuevo Leon: a validation study with blood group markers.
    Cerda-Flores RM; Barton SA; Marty-Gonzalez LF; Rivas F; Chakraborty R
    Am J Phys Anthropol; 1999 Jul; 109(3):281-93. PubMed ID: 10407460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Recent decline in nonpaternity rates: a cross-temporal meta-analysis.
    Voracek M; Haubner T; Fisher ML
    Psychol Rep; 2008 Dec; 103(3):799-811. PubMed ID: 19320216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Paternity exclusion power: comparative behaviour of autosomal and X-chromosomal markers in standard and deficient cases with inbreeding.
    Pinto N; Gusmão L; Egeland T; Amorim A
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2013 Feb; 7(2):290-5. PubMed ID: 23312390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Relationship estimation in affected sib pair analysis of late-onset diseases.
    Göring HH; Ott J
    Eur J Hum Genet; 1997; 5(2):69-77. PubMed ID: 9195155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Blood grouping tests for paternity and nonpaternity.
    Sussman LN; Gilja BK
    N Y State J Med; 1981 Mar; 81(3):343-6. PubMed ID: 6938823
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Assigning a probability for paternity in apparent cases of mutation.
    Rothman ED; Neel JV; Hoppe FM
    Am J Hum Genet; 1981 Jul; 33(4):617-28. PubMed ID: 6942652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Relationship inference from trios of individuals, in the presence of typing error.
    Sieberts SK; Wijsman EM; Thompson EA
    Am J Hum Genet; 2002 Jan; 70(1):170-80. PubMed ID: 11727198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Estimating parental relationship in linkage analysis of recessive traits.
    Mérette C; Ott J
    Am J Med Genet; 1996 May; 63(2):386-91. PubMed ID: 8725791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Identifying marker typing incompatibilities in linkage analysis.
    Stringham HM; Boehnke M
    Am J Hum Genet; 1996 Oct; 59(4):946-50. PubMed ID: 8808612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Paternity testing 3: exclusion probabilities.
    Brown CM; Seber GA
    Am J Med Genet; 1987 Jan; 26(1):157-66. PubMed ID: 3812556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Basic fallacies in the formulation of the paternity index.
    Li CC; Chakravarti A
    Am J Hum Genet; 1985 Jul; 37(4):809-18. PubMed ID: 9556669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluating pedigree data. II. Identifying the cause of error in families with inconsistencies.
    Lathrop GM; Huntsman JW; Hooper AB; Ward RH
    Hum Hered; 1983; 33(6):377-89. PubMed ID: 6585347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Guess LOD approach: sufficient conditions for robustness.
    Williamson JA; Amos CI
    Genet Epidemiol; 1995; 12(2):163-76. PubMed ID: 7607416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Nonpaternity in linkage studies of extremely discordant sib pairs.
    Neale MC; Neale BM; Sullivan PF
    Am J Hum Genet; 2002 Feb; 70(2):526-9. PubMed ID: 11745068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Paternity exclusion by DNA markers: effects of paternal mutations.
    Chakraborty R; Stivers DN
    J Forensic Sci; 1996 Jul; 41(4):671-7. PubMed ID: 8754581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Paternity inclusion in the presence of multiple exclusions.
    Gutendorf RW; Smith RA; Leis K; Yates J
    Ann Clin Lab Sci; 1991; 21(4):240-5. PubMed ID: 1830465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Informativeness of genetic markers for pairwise relationship and relatedness inference.
    Wang J
    Theor Popul Biol; 2006 Nov; 70(3):300-21. PubMed ID: 16388833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.