These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7862836)

  • 1. Drug discrimination is a continuous rather than a quantal process following training on a VI-TO schedule of reinforcement.
    Barrett RJ; Caul WF; Huffman EM; Smith RL
    Psychopharmacology (Berl); 1994 Jan; 113(3-4):289-96; discussion 297-303. PubMed ID: 7862836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Discriminative stimulus effects of nicotine in rats trained under different schedules of reinforcement.
    Stolerman IP
    Psychopharmacology (Berl); 1989; 97(1):131-8. PubMed ID: 2496419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Long-lasting rebound cue effects following single doses of nicotine and amphetamine: implications for understanding tolerance.
    Barrett RJ; Caul WF; Stadler JR; Smith RL
    Psychopharmacology (Berl); 2001 Oct; 157(4):349-57. PubMed ID: 11605093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Characterizing withdrawal in rats following repeated drug administration using an amphetamine-vehicle-haloperidol drug discrimination.
    Stadler JR; Caul WF; Barrett RJ
    Psychopharmacology (Berl); 1999 Apr; 143(3):219-26. PubMed ID: 10353423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Reinforcement schedule effects in rats trained to discriminate 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA) or cocaine.
    Kueh D; Baker LE
    Psychopharmacology (Berl); 2007 Jan; 189(4):447-57. PubMed ID: 17019568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Drug discrimination in rats: evidence for amphetamine-like cue state following chronic haloperidol.
    Barrett RJ; Steranka LR
    Pharmacol Biochem Behav; 1983 Apr; 18(4):611-7. PubMed ID: 6867066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Schedule control of quantal and graded dose-effect curves in a drug-drug-saline discrimination.
    McMillan DE; Li M; Hardwick WC
    Pharmacol Biochem Behav; 2001 Mar; 68(3):395-402. PubMed ID: 11325391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A three-choice haloperidol-saline-cocaine drug discrimination task in rats.
    Gauvin DV; Goulden KL; Holloway FA
    Pharmacol Biochem Behav; 1994 Sep; 49(1):223-7. PubMed ID: 7816878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Discriminative stimulus properties of substituted amphetamine derivatives.
    Corrigall WA; Coen KM; Saouda FM; Robertson JM; Lodge BA
    Pharmacol Biochem Behav; 1992 Dec; 43(4):1117-9. PubMed ID: 1475294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Quantal detection and homogeneous sensitivity in a pentylenetetrazol discrimination.
    Harris CM; Emmett-Oglesby MW; Mathis DA; Lal H
    Psychopharmacology (Berl); 1988; 94(2):183-7. PubMed ID: 3127843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Drug discrimination under concurrent variable-ratio variable-ratio schedules.
    McMillan DE; Hardwick WC; Li M
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2002 Jan; 77(1):91-104. PubMed ID: 11831785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Discriminative properties of the psychostimulant dl-cathinone in a two lever operant task. Lack of evidence for dopaminergic mediation.
    Goudie AJ; Atkinson J; West CR
    Neuropharmacology; 1986 Jan; 25(1):85-94. PubMed ID: 2869439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Discrimination of the amphetamine cue. Effects of A, B and mixed type inhibitors of monoamine oxidase.
    Porsolt RD; Pawelec C; Roux S; Jalfre M
    Neuropharmacology; 1984 May; 23(5):569-73. PubMed ID: 6429563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Drug discrimination in rats under concurrent variable-interval variable-interval schedules.
    McMillan DE; Hardwick WC
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2000 Jan; 73(1):103-20. PubMed ID: 10682343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Drug discrimination analysis of pseudoephedrine in rats.
    Tongjaroenbuangam W; Meksuriyen D; Govitrapong P; Kotchabhakdi N; Baldwin BA
    Pharmacol Biochem Behav; 1998 Feb; 59(2):505-10. PubMed ID: 9477001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Schedule-dependent effects of haloperidol and amphetamine: multiple-schedule task shows within-subject effects.
    Caul WF; Brindle NA
    Pharmacol Biochem Behav; 2001 Jan; 68(1):53-63. PubMed ID: 11274708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Amphetamine-haloperidol discrimination: effects of chronic drug treatment.
    Haenlein M; Caul WF; Barrett RJ
    Pharmacol Biochem Behav; 1985 Dec; 23(6):949-52. PubMed ID: 4080781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Increased drug sensitivity in the drug discrimination procedure afforded by drug versus drug training.
    Boja JW; Schechter MD
    Psychopharmacology (Berl); 1990; 102(2):221-6. PubMed ID: 2274604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Discriminative stimulus properties of the atypical antipsychotic clozapine and the typical antipsychotic chlorpromazine in a three-choice drug discrimination procedure in rats.
    Porter JH; Prus AJ; Vann RE; Varvel SA
    Psychopharmacology (Berl); 2005 Feb; 178(1):67-77. PubMed ID: 15316715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Reinforcement frequency, but not gender, determines sensitivity to discriminative stimulus effects of morphine.
    Craft RM; Morgan CL; Bernal SA
    Behav Pharmacol; 1998 Jul; 9(4):357-62. PubMed ID: 10065924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.