BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

189 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7862991)

  • 21. Improved mammographic imaging using tissue expanders for breast augmentation.
    Matory WE; D'Orsi C; Moss L
    Ann Plast Surg; 1994 Aug; 33(2):119-27. PubMed ID: 7979041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Sentinel lymph node biopsy following prior augmentation mammaplasty and implant rupture.
    Warbrick-Smith J; Cawthorn SJ
    J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2012 Dec; 65(12):e348-50. PubMed ID: 23047180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Form stability of the Style 410 anatomically shaped cohesive silicone gel-filled breast implant in subglandular breast augmentation evaluated with magnetic resonance imaging.
    Weum S; de Weerd L; Kristiansen B
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2011 Jan; 127(1):409-413. PubMed ID: 21200237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. An in vivo study of the effect of various breast implant filler materials on mammography.
    Handel N; Silverstein MJ; Gamagami P; Collins A
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 1993 May; 91(6):1057-62; discussion 1063-5. PubMed ID: 8479971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Primary breast augmentation clinical trial outcomes stratified by surgical incision, anatomical placement and implant device type.
    Namnoum JD; Largent J; Kaplan HM; Oefelein MG; Brown MH
    J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2013 Sep; 66(9):1165-72. PubMed ID: 23664574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Considerations of previous augmentation in subsequent breast reconstruction.
    Spear SL; Clemens MW; Dayan JH
    Aesthet Surg J; 2008; 28(3):285-93. PubMed ID: 19083539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Biocompatibility of radiolucent breast implants.
    Young VL; Lund H; Destouet J; Pidgeon L; Ueda K
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 1991 Sep; 88(3):462-74. PubMed ID: 1871225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. [Silicone breast implants with silicone gel and autoimmune disease--are they related?].
    Winkler E; Bar-Meir E; Regev E; Haik J; Tamir J; Orenstein A
    Harefuah; 2003 Jul; 142(7):536-40, 565. PubMed ID: 12908390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. [Silicone breast implants and risk of carcinoma].
    Stanec Z; Svajger I; Stanec S; Budi S; Milanović R; Jelavić H
    Lijec Vjesn; 1997; 119(8-9):233-5. PubMed ID: 9481890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The correction of capsular contracture by conversion to "dual-plane" positioning: technique and outcomes.
    Spear SL; Carter ME; Ganz JC
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2003 Aug; 112(2):456-66. PubMed ID: 12900603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Maximizing the use of precapsular space and the choice of implant type in breast augmentation mammaplasty revisions: review of 49 consecutive procedures and patient satisfaction assessment.
    Castello MF; Lazzeri D; Silvestri A; Agostini T; Pascone C; Marcelli C; Gigliotti D; D'Aniello C; Gasparotti M
    Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2011 Oct; 35(5):828-38. PubMed ID: 21455821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Efficacy of spot compression-magnification and tangential views in mammographic evaluation of palpable breast masses.
    Faulk RM; Sickles EA
    Radiology; 1992 Oct; 185(1):87-90. PubMed ID: 1523339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Preliminary (3 years) experience with smooth wall silicone gel implants for primary breast augmentation.
    Seify H; Sullivan K; Hester TR
    Ann Plast Surg; 2005 Mar; 54(3):231-5; discussion 235. PubMed ID: 15725819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Silicone gel filled breast implants and connective tissue disease: an overview.
    Spiera RF; Gibofsky A; Spiera H
    J Rheumatol; 1994 Feb; 21(2):239-45. PubMed ID: 8182631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Imaging of the patient with silicone gel breast implants.
    Piccoli CW
    Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am; 2001 May; 9(2):393-408, vii-viii. PubMed ID: 11493428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Screening mammography: value in women 35-39 years old.
    Liberman L; Dershaw DD; Deutch BM; Thaler HT; Lippin BS
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1993 Jul; 161(1):53-6. PubMed ID: 8517320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The comparative value of mammographic screening for women 40-49 years old versus women 50-64 years old.
    Curpen BN; Sickles EA; Sollitto RA; Ominsky SH; Galvin HB; Frankel SD
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 May; 164(5):1099-103. PubMed ID: 7717212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Sonographic features with histologic correlation in two cases of palpable breast cancer after breast augmentation by liquid silicone injection.
    Cheung YC; Lee KF; Ng SH; Chan SC; Wong AM
    J Clin Ultrasound; 2002; 30(9):548-51. PubMed ID: 12404521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Silicone-gel-filled breast implants: how they interface with breast cancer. The Working Group on Guidelines for Silicone Gel-Filled Breast Implants.
    Morrison B; Mickelson WP
    Cancer Prev Control; 1997; 1(1):61-5. PubMed ID: 9765728
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Monitoring the axilla in patients with silicone gel implants.
    Kulber DA; Mackenzie D; Steiner JH; Glassman H; Hopp D; Hiatt JR; Hoffman L
    Ann Plast Surg; 1995 Dec; 35(6):580-4. PubMed ID: 8748338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.