189 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7862991)
61. Diagnosis of breast implant rupture: imaging findings and relative efficacies of imaging techniques.
Everson LI; Parantainen H; Detlie T; Stillman AE; Olson PN; Landis G; Foshager MC; Cunningham B; Griffiths HJ
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Jul; 163(1):57-60. PubMed ID: 8010248
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
62. Silicone implant rupture: detection with US.
Harris KM; Ganott MA; Shestak KC; Losken HW; Tobon H
Radiology; 1993 Jun; 187(3):761-8. PubMed ID: 8497626
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
63. Discussion. Form stability of the Style 410 anatomically shaped cohesive silicone gel-filled breast implant in subglandular breast augmentation evaluated with magnetic resonance imaging.
Hammond DC
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2011 Jan; 127(1):414-416. PubMed ID: 21200238
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
64. Relation of free silicone to human breast carcinoma.
Morgenstern L; Gleischman SH; Michel SL; Rosenberg JE; Knight I; Goodman D
Arch Surg; 1985 May; 120(5):573-7. PubMed ID: 2985027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
65. The effect of silicone implants on the diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment of breast cancer.
Handel N
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2007 Dec; 120(7 Suppl 1):81S-93S. PubMed ID: 18090817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
66. Breast carcinoma originating from a silicone granuloma: a case report.
Nakahori R; Takahashi R; Akashi M; Tsutsui K; Harada S; Matsubayashi RN; Nakagawa S; Momosaki S; Akagi Y
World J Surg Oncol; 2015 Feb; 13():72. PubMed ID: 25888835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
67. Imaging of complications of augmentation mammaplasty.
Leibman AJ
Plast Reconstr Surg; 1994 May; 93(6):1134-40. PubMed ID: 8171131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
68. MR imaging of the augmented breast.
Huch RA; Künzi W; Debatin JF; Wiesner W; Krestin GP
Eur Radiol; 1998; 8(3):371-6. PubMed ID: 9510568
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
69. [Silicone gel-filled breast implants and breast cancer--an update and safety].
Winkler E; Regev E; Bar-Meir E; Orenstein A
Harefuah; 2004 Mar; 143(3):222-6, 244. PubMed ID: 15065364
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
70. Medical-legal pitfalls for the breast surgeon: incomplete mammographic localization of suspicious lesions and the correlation between palpable and mammographic abnormalities.
Brobeil A; Bermann C; Clark R; Cox C; Reintgen D
Am Surg; 1996 Jun; 62(6):484-7. PubMed ID: 8651534
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
71. [Key Points of Examination after Breast Augmentation and Our Clinic's Algorithm of Immediate Reconstruction Using Silicone Implant for Breast Cancer Patient after Breast Augmentation].
Tsubota Y; Niwa K; Yamamoto D; Nakazawa M; Yamaguchi S; Nagumo Y
Gan To Kagaku Ryoho; 2024 Apr; 51(4):460-462. PubMed ID: 38644322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
72. [Additional images and subsequent palpation--indispensable conditions for efficient diagnosis using mammography].
Hüppe JR
Z Lymphol; 1986 Dec; 10(2):63-76. PubMed ID: 3825243
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
73. Does long-term exposure to gel-filled silicone implants increase the risk of relapse after breast cancer?
Petit JY; Lê M; Rietjens M; Contesso G; Lehmann A; Mouriesse H
Tumori; 1998; 84(5):525-8. PubMed ID: 9862510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
74. Breast phantom with silicone implant for evaluation in conventional mammography.
Silva FA; Souza LF; Salmon CE; Souza DN
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2010 Sep; 12(1):3340. PubMed ID: 21330982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
75. Comparison between sonography and mammography for breast cancer diagnosis in oriental women after augmentation mammaplasty.
Hou MF; Ou-Yang F; Chuang CH; Wang JY; Lee LW; Huang YS; Huang CJ; Hsieh JS; Lai CS; Lin SD; Huang TJ
Ann Plast Surg; 2002 Aug; 49(2):120-6. PubMed ID: 12187337
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
76. The role of mammography in detecting breast cancer in augmented breasts.
Grace GT; Roberts C; Cohen IK
Ann Plast Surg; 1990 Aug; 25(2):119-23. PubMed ID: 2396819
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
77. Mammography: evaluation following breast augmentation.
Williford ME
N C Med J; 1991 Oct; 52(10):515-9. PubMed ID: 1944622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
78. Just how good can we get?
Reitherman RW
Radiol Technol; 1994; 65(5):307-8. PubMed ID: 8058913
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
79. Augmentation mammoplasty: effect on diagnosis of breast cancer.
McIntosh SA; Horgan K
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2008; 61(2):124-9. PubMed ID: 18039600
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
80. The clinical and imaging characteristics of breast cancers in patients with interstitial mammoplasty.
Kang BJ; Kim SH; Choi JJ; Lee JH; Cha ES; Kim HS; Park CS; Whang IY
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2010 Jun; 281(6):1029-35. PubMed ID: 19890654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
