These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

60 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7863080)

  • 1. [Quantitative analysis in the evaluation of coronary stenosis].
    Cequier A; Sabaté M; Gómez-Hospital JA; Mauri J; Sala J; Jara F; Esplugas E
    Rev Esp Cardiol; 1994; 47 Suppl 4():140-6. PubMed ID: 7863080
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Clinical use of lossy image compression in digital angiography.
    Elion JL; Whiting JS
    Am J Cardiol; 1996 Jul; 78(2):219-20. PubMed ID: 8712147
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Accuracy and reliability of quantitative measurement of coronary arterial stenosis by videodensitometry on coronary angiogram.
    Akishita M; Ouchi Y; Kozaki K; Orimo A; Hattori A; Orimo H
    Jpn Heart J; 1992 Sep; 33(5):631-41. PubMed ID: 1289595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Compression of digital coronary angiograms does not affect visual or quantitative assessment of coronary artery stenosis severity.
    Rigolin VH; Robiolio PA; Spero LA; Harrawood BP; Morris KG; Fortin DF; Baker WA; Bashore TM; Cusma JT
    Am J Cardiol; 1996 Jul; 78(2):131-5. PubMed ID: 8712131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Digital subtraction coronary arteriography with ECG synchronization].
    Takamiya M
    Nihon Rinsho; 1994 Jul; 52 Suppl(Pt 1):247-50. PubMed ID: 12436532
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Digital subtraction angiography for the assessment of myocardial perfusion].
    Felder LM; Hess OM; Vassalli F; Jiang Z; Grimm J; Krayenbühl HP
    Schweiz Rundsch Med Prax; 1992 Oct; 81(43):1277-80. PubMed ID: 1411017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Impact of various compression rates on interpretation of digital coronary angiograms.
    Silber S; Dörr R; Zindler G; Mühling H; Diebel T
    Int J Cardiol; 1997 Jul; 60(2):195-200. PubMed ID: 9226291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Venous digital subtraction angiography of the left ventricle in comparison with conventional angiography].
    Rother T; Neugebauer A; Duck HJ; Krosse B
    Z Gesamte Inn Med; 1990 Mar; 45(5):133-7. PubMed ID: 2356627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The role of digital subtraction angiography in the quantitation of coronary stenosis.
    Katritsis D; Webb-Peploe MM
    Int J Cardiol; 1990 Dec; 29(3):277-83. PubMed ID: 2283186
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Assessing coronary stenosis: by which method and for what purpose?
    Bourassa MG; Lespérance J
    Eur Heart J; 1996 Aug; 17(8):1137-8. PubMed ID: 8869850
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Quantitative coronary arteriography: design and validation.
    Ratib OM; Mankovich NJ
    Radiology; 1988 Jun; 167(3):743-7. PubMed ID: 3363133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Measurement of arterial dimensions: review of visual and quantitative angiographic techniques.
    Gibson CM; Safian RD
    J Invasive Cardiol; 1991; 3(2):66-74. PubMed ID: 10149114
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Densitometric studies in digital subtraction angiography: assessment of pulmonary and myocardial perfusion.
    Bürsch JH
    Herz; 1985 Aug; 10(4):208-14. PubMed ID: 3899885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Digital coronary angiography: the new gold standard?
    Hartnell G; Wilde P
    Br Heart J; 1991 Sep; 66(3):196-8. PubMed ID: 1931345
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Quantitative coronary angiography: methodologic principles of a densitometric procedure].
    Sievert H; Bakim E; Kober G; Kaltenbach M
    Z Kardiol; 1988 Jan; 77(1):18-21. PubMed ID: 3363977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Noninvasive coronary angiography with synchrotron irradiation].
    Dix WR; Engelke K; Heuer J; Graeff W; Kupper W; Lohmann M; Makin I; Möchel T; Reumann R
    Biomed Tech (Berl); 1989; 34 Suppl():79-80. PubMed ID: 2819218
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Non-subtraction digital coronary arteriography].
    Akutsu T; Yamaguchi K
    Nihon Rinsho; 1994 Jul; 52 Suppl(Pt 1):251-5. PubMed ID: 12436533
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [The usefulness of digital angiography in performing coronary angioplasty. An analysis of 100 cases].
    Pinto IM; Sousa AG; Feres F; Tanajura LF; Mattos LA; Cano MN; Maldonado G; Fontes VF; Sousa JE
    Arq Bras Cardiol; 1992 Oct; 59(4):255-9. PubMed ID: 1341180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Comparisons of images simultaneously documented by digital subtraction coronary arteriography and cine coronary arteriography].
    Kimura K; Takamiya M; Yamamoto K; Ohta M; Naito H
    J Cardiol; 1988 Dec; 18(4):889-97. PubMed ID: 3267727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Videodensitometric analysis of the characteristics of coronary blood flow using computed digital angiography in patients with ischemic heart disease].
    Savchenko AP; Pomerantsev EV; Abugov SA; Blank ML
    Biull Vsesoiuznogo Kardiol Nauchn Tsentra AMN SSSR; 1988; 11(2):96-102. PubMed ID: 3069118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 3.