These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
108 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7863882)
41. Do arterial phase helical CT images improve detection or characterization of colorectal liver metastases? Ch'en IY; Katz DS; Jeffrey RB; Daniel BL; Li KC; Beaulieu CF; Mindelzun RE; Yao D; Olcott EW J Comput Assist Tomogr; 1997; 21(3):391-7. PubMed ID: 9135646 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Detection of hypovascular hepatic metastases at triple-phase helical CT: sensitivity of phases and comparison with surgical and histopathologic findings. Soyer P; Poccard M; Boudiaf M; Abitbol M; Hamzi L; Panis Y; Valleur P; Rymer R Radiology; 2004 May; 231(2):413-20. PubMed ID: 15044747 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. [Dynamic computed tomography in the characterization of focal hepatic lesions]. De Franco A; Maresca G; De Gaetano AM; Giovannini I; Chiarla C; Marano P Radiol Med; 1996; 91(1-2):91-100. PubMed ID: 8614739 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Hepatic parenchymal enhancement during triple-phase helical CT: can it be used to predict which patients with breast cancer will develop hepatic metastases? Sheafor DH; Killius JS; Paulson EK; DeLong DM; Foti AM; Nelson RC Radiology; 2000 Mar; 214(3):875-80. PubMed ID: 10715061 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. A comparison of two injection protocols using helical and dynamic acquisitions in CT examinations of the pancreas. Bonaldi VM; Bret PM; Atri M; Garcia P; Reinhold C AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1996 Jul; 167(1):49-55. PubMed ID: 8659419 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Perfluorooctylbromide as a contrast agent for CT and sonography: preliminary clinical results. Behan M; O'Connell D; Mattrey RF; Carney DN AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1993 Feb; 160(2):399-405. PubMed ID: 8424361 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Liver lesions: improved detection with dual-detector-array CT and routine 2.5-mm thin collimation. Weg N; Scheer MR; Gabor MP Radiology; 1998 Nov; 209(2):417-26. PubMed ID: 9807568 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Hepatic CT enhancement. Part I. Alterations in the volume of contrast material within the same patients. Chambers TP; Baron RL; Lush RM Radiology; 1994 Nov; 193(2):513-7. PubMed ID: 7972770 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Peak enhancement of the liver in children using power injection and helical CT. Ruess L; Bulas DI; Kushner DC; Silverman PM; Fearon TC AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1998 Mar; 170(3):677-81. PubMed ID: 9490952 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Aortic enhancement during abdominal CT angiography: correlation with test injections, flow rates, and patient demographics. Platt JF; Reige KA; Ellis JH AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1999 Jan; 172(1):53-6. PubMed ID: 9888738 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Liver metastases: imaging considerations for protocol development with multislice CT (MSCT). Silverman PM Cancer Imaging; 2006 Nov; 6(1):175-81. PubMed ID: 17098650 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Comparison of unenhanced and contrast-enhanced spiral CT for assessing interval change in patients with colorectal liver metastases. Park JH; Nazarian LN; Halpern EJ; Feld RI; Lev-Toaff AS; Parker L; Wechsler RJ Acad Radiol; 2001 Aug; 8(8):698-704. PubMed ID: 11508748 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Imaging of the liver with helical CT: a survey of scanning techniques. Silverman PM; Kohan L; Ducic I; Javadi S; Meyer C; Sharma N; Cooper C; Zeman RK AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1998 Jan; 170(1):149-52. PubMed ID: 9423622 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Automatic bolus tracking in monophasic spiral CT of the liver: liver-to-lesion conspicuity. Mehnert F; Pereira PL; Trübenbach J; Kopp AF; Claussen CD Eur Radiol; 2001; 11(4):580-4. PubMed ID: 11354750 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Role of IV iodinated contrast material in 18F-FDG PET/CT of liver metastases. Badiee S; Franc BL; Webb EM; Chu B; Hawkins RA; Coakley F; Singer L AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2008 Nov; 191(5):1436-9. PubMed ID: 18941082 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Difference in global hepatic enhancement assessed by dynamic CT in normal subjects and patients with hepatic metastases. Platt JF; Francis IR; Ellis JH; Reige KA J Comput Assist Tomogr; 1997; 21(3):348-54. PubMed ID: 9135639 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Helical CT of the liver: clinical application of an automated computer technique, SmartPrep, for obtaining images with optimal contrast enhancement. Silverman PM; Roberts S; Tefft MC; Brown B; Fox SH; Cooper C; Zeman RK AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 Jul; 165(1):73-8. PubMed ID: 7785637 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Optimizing contrast-enhanced abdominal CT in infants and children using bolus tracking. Frush DP; Spencer EB; Donnelly LF; Zheng JY; DeLong DM; Bisset GS AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1999 Apr; 172(4):1007-13. PubMed ID: 10587137 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]