257 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7864466)
21. Three-dimensional cephalometric norms of Chinese adults in Hong Kong with balanced facial profile.
Cheung LK; Chan YM; Jayaratne YS; Lo J
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2011 Aug; 112(2):e56-73. PubMed ID: 21665497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Cephalometric assessment of effect of head rotation toward focal spot on lateral cephalometric radiographs.
Naresh V; Lokesh NK; Pratapvarma KV; Srikrishna C; Chakravarthy VG; Shamnur N
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2013 Mar; 14(2):202-7. PubMed ID: 23811646
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Craniofacial features of patients with sickle cell anemia and sickle cell trait.
Pithon MM; Palmeira LM; Barbosa AA; Pereira R; de Andrade AC; Coqueiro Rda S
Angle Orthod; 2014 Sep; 84(5):825-9. PubMed ID: 24592905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Evaluation of cephalometric landmark identification on CBCT multiplanar and 3D reconstructions.
Neiva MB; Soares ÁC; Lisboa Cde O; Vilella Ode V; Motta AT
Angle Orthod; 2015 Jan; 85(1):11-7. PubMed ID: 24713068
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Comparison between two-dimensional and midsagittal three-dimensional cephalometric measurements of dry human skulls.
Damstra J; Fourie Z; Ren Y
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2011 Jul; 49(5):392-5. PubMed ID: 20615593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Lateral cephalometric diagnosis of asymmetry in Angle Class II subdivision compared to Class I and II.
Meloti AF; Gonçalves Rde C; Silva E; Martins LP; dos Santos-Pinto A
Dental Press J Orthod; 2014; 19(4):80-8. PubMed ID: 25279525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Morphometric methods to evaluate craniofacial growth: study in rabbits.
de Abreu AT; Veeck EB; da Costa NP
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2006 Mar; 35(2):83-7. PubMed ID: 16549434
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Reliability of anatomic structures as landmarks in three-dimensional cephalometric analysis using CBCT.
Naji P; Alsufyani NA; Lagravère MO
Angle Orthod; 2014 Sep; 84(5):762-72. PubMed ID: 24364751
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Reliability of landmark identification in cephalometric radiography acquired by a storage phosphor imaging system.
Chen YJ; Chen SK; Huang HW; Yao CC; Chang HF
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2004 Sep; 33(5):301-6. PubMed ID: 15585806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. A method of magnification correction for posteroanterior radiographic cephalometry.
Hsiao TH; Chang HP; Liu KM
Angle Orthod; 1997; 67(2):137-42. PubMed ID: 9107378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Reproducibility of three-dimensional cephalometric landmarks in cone-beam and low-dose computed tomography.
Olszewski R; Frison L; Wisniewski M; Denis JM; Vynckier S; Cosnard G; Zech F; Reychler H
Clin Oral Investig; 2013 Jan; 17(1):285-92. PubMed ID: 22350037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. 3D-CT evaluation of facial asymmetry.
Katsumata A; Fujishita M; Maeda M; Ariji Y; Ariji E; Langlais RP
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2005 Feb; 99(2):212-20. PubMed ID: 15660095
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Low-dose protocol of the spiral CT in orthodontics: comparative evaluation of entrance skin dose with traditional X-ray techniques.
Cordasco G; Portelli M; Militi A; Nucera R; Lo Giudice A; Gatto E; Lucchese A
Prog Orthod; 2013 Sep; 14():24. PubMed ID: 24325970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Radiographic evaluation of orthodontic treatment by means of four different cephalometric superimposition methods.
Lenza MA; Carvalho AA; Lenza EB; Lenza MG; Torres HM; Souza JB
Dental Press J Orthod; 2015; 20(3):29-36. PubMed ID: 26154453
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Assessment of the reliability and repeatability of landmarks using 3-D cephalometric software.
Frongia G; Piancino MG; Bracco AA; Crincoli V; Debernardi CL; Bracco P
Cranio; 2012 Oct; 30(4):255-63. PubMed ID: 23156966
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Combined effects of errors in frontal-view asymmetry diagnosis.
Pirttiniemi P; Miettinen J; Kantomaa T
Eur J Orthod; 1996 Dec; 18(6):629-36. PubMed ID: 9009427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. A three-dimensional cephalometric analysis.
Cho HJ
J Clin Orthod; 2009 Apr; 43(4):235-52, discussion 235; quiz 273. PubMed ID: 19458456
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. A comparison between radiographic and sonically produced cephalometric values.
Prawat JS; Nieberg L; Cisneros GJ; Acs G
Angle Orthod; 1995; 65(4):271-6. PubMed ID: 7486241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Evaluating craniofacial asymmetry with digital cephalometric images and cone-beam computed tomography.
de Moraes ME; Hollender LG; Chen CS; Moraes LC; Balducci I
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Jun; 139(6):e523-31. PubMed ID: 21640864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. A three-dimensional comparison of a morphometric and conventional cephalometric midsagittal planes for craniofacial asymmetry.
Damstra J; Fourie Z; De Wit M; Ren Y
Clin Oral Investig; 2012 Feb; 16(1):285-94. PubMed ID: 21271348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
