These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7864923)
21. A comparison of infections and complications in central venous catheters in adults with solid tumours. Coady K; Ali M; Sidloff D; Kenningham RR; Ahmed S J Vasc Access; 2015; 16(1):38-41. PubMed ID: 25198809 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Low risk of central venous thrombosis with nontunnelled central venous catheters. Murphy PT; O'Connor N Clin Lab Haematol; 2001 Jun; 23(3):187-8. PubMed ID: 11553060 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Placement and management of long-term central venous access catheters and ports. Denny DF AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1993 Aug; 161(2):385-93. PubMed ID: 8333382 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Thrombotic complications of silicone rubber catheters during autologous marrow and peripheral stem cell transplantation: prospective comparison of Hickman and Groshong catheters. Haire WD; Lieberman RP; Lund GB; Edney JA; Kessinger A; Armitage JO Bone Marrow Transplant; 1991 Jan; 7(1):57-9. PubMed ID: 1675136 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. A prospective study of Hickman/Broviac catheters and implantable ports in pediatric oncology patients. Mirro J; Rao BN; Stokes DC; Austin BA; Kumar M; Dahl GV; Colten M; Balas L; Rafferty M; Hancock M J Clin Oncol; 1989 Feb; 7(2):214-22. PubMed ID: 2915237 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Infection rates of Broviac-Hickman catheters and implantable venous devices. Wurzel CL; Halom K; Feldman JG; Rubin LG Am J Dis Child; 1988 May; 142(5):536-40. PubMed ID: 3358396 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Fracture of totally implanted central venous access devices: a propensity-score-matched comparison of risks for Groshong silicone versus polyurethane catheters. Kojima S; Hiraki T; Gobara H; Iguchi T; Fujiwara H; Matsui Y; Mitsuhashi T; Kanazawa S J Vasc Access; 2016 Nov; 17(6):535-541. PubMed ID: 27768210 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Risk of deep venous thrombosis associated with chest versus arm central venous subcutaneous port catheters: a 5-year single-institution retrospective study. Kuriakose P; Colon-Otero G; Paz-Fumagalli R J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2002 Feb; 13(2 Pt 1):179-84. PubMed ID: 11830624 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Utility and safety of Hickman catheters for venous access after bone marrow transplantation. Kumagai T; Sakamaki H; Tanikawa S; Akiyama H; Maeda Y; Sasaki T; Tsuzuki S; Takamoto S; Takahashi K; Onozawa Y Intern Med; 1998 Mar; 37(3):286-91. PubMed ID: 9617864 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Vascular access devices in leukemia: a retrospective review amongst patients treated at the Ottawa Hospital with induction chemotherapy for acute leukemia. Skaff ER; Doucette S; McDiarmid S; Huebsch L; Sabloff M Leuk Lymphoma; 2012 Jun; 53(6):1090-5. PubMed ID: 22080756 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Rates of infection for single-lumen versus multilumen central venous catheters: a meta-analysis. Dezfulian C; Lavelle J; Nallamothu BK; Kaufman SR; Saint S Crit Care Med; 2003 Sep; 31(9):2385-90. PubMed ID: 14501971 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Tip position of long-term central venous access devices used for parenteral nutrition. DeChicco R; Seidner DL; Brun C; Steiger E; Stafford J; Lopez R JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr; 2007; 31(5):382-7. PubMed ID: 17712146 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Avoiding complications of long-term venous access. Henriques HF; Karmy-Jones R; Knoll SM; Copes WS; Giordano JM Am Surg; 1993 Sep; 59(9):555-8. PubMed ID: 8368659 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. A comparison of placement techniques and complications of externalized catheters and implantable port use in children with cancer. Mirro J; Rao BN; Kumar M; Rafferty M; Hancock M; Austin BA; Fairclough D; Lobe TE J Pediatr Surg; 1990 Jan; 25(1):120-4. PubMed ID: 2299536 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Comparative study of infectious complications of different types of chronic central venous access devices. Hidalgo M Cancer; 1995 Jan; 75(1):132-3. PubMed ID: 7804967 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Low infection rate and long durability of nontunneled silastic catheters. A safe and cost-effective alternative for long-term venous access. Raad I; Davis S; Becker M; Hohn D; Houston D; Umphrey J; Bodey GP Arch Intern Med; 1993 Aug; 153(15):1791-6. PubMed ID: 8392831 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]