These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7866844)

  • 1. Artifacts in magnetic resonance imaging of the spine after surgery with or without implant.
    Leclet H
    Eur Spine J; 1994; 3(5):240-5. PubMed ID: 7866844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Open MR imaging in spine surgery: experimental investigations and first clinical experiences.
    Verheyden P; Katscher S; Schulz T; Schmidt F; Josten C
    Eur Spine J; 1999; 8(5):346-53. PubMed ID: 10552316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Magnetic resonance imaging evaluation of the spine with metal implants. General safety and superior imaging with titanium.
    Rupp R; Ebraheim NA; Savolaine ER; Jackson WT
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1993 Mar; 18(3):379-85. PubMed ID: 8475442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation of MR issues for the latest standard brands of orthopedic metal implants: plates and screws.
    Zou YF; Chu B; Wang CB; Hu ZY
    Eur J Radiol; 2015 Mar; 84(3):450-457. PubMed ID: 25544555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. MR parameters for imaging titanium spinal instrumentation.
    Wang JC; Sandhu HS; Yu WD; Minchew JT; Delamarter RB
    J Spinal Disord; 1997 Feb; 10(1):27-32. PubMed ID: 9041493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Magnetic resonance imaging after pedicular screw fixation of the spine.
    Ebraheim NA; Savolaine ER; Stitgen SH; Jackson WT
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1992 Jun; (279):133-7. PubMed ID: 1600647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Use of titanium wire in cervical spine fixation as a means to reduce MR artifacts.
    Mirvis SE; Geisler F; Joslyn JN; Zrebeet H
    AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 1988; 9(6):1229-31. PubMed ID: 3143247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Minimizing artifacts caused by metallic implants at MR imaging: experimental and clinical studies.
    Suh JS; Jeong EK; Shin KH; Cho JH; Na JB; Kim DH; Han CD
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1998 Nov; 171(5):1207-13. PubMed ID: 9798849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Reducing metallic artifacts in postoperative spinal imaging: usefulness of IDEAL contrast-enhanced T1- and T2-weighted MR imaging--phantom and clinical studies.
    Cha JG; Jin W; Lee MH; Kim DH; Park JS; Shin WH; Yi BH
    Radiology; 2011 Jun; 259(3):885-93. PubMed ID: 21386053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The postoperative spine.
    Henk CB; Brodner W; Grampp S; Breitenseher M; Thurnher M; Mostbeck GH; Imhof H
    Top Magn Reson Imaging; 1999 Aug; 10(4):247-64. PubMed ID: 10616816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Titanium wire internal fixation for stabilization of injury of the cervical spine: clinical results and postoperative magnetic resonance imaging of the spinal cord.
    Geisler FH; Mirvis SE; Zrebeet H; Joslyn JN
    Neurosurgery; 1989 Sep; 25(3):356-62. PubMed ID: 2771006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Magnetic resonance imaging in cadaver dogs with metallic vertebral implants at 3 Tesla: evaluation of the WARP-turbo spin echo sequence.
    Griffin JF; Archambault NS; Mankin JM; Wall CR; Thompson JA; Padua A; Purdy D; Kerwin SC
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2013 Nov; 38(24):E1548-53. PubMed ID: 23921320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A comparison of magnetic and radiographic imaging artifact after using three types of metal rods: stainless steel, titanium, and vitallium.
    Knott PT; Mardjetko SM; Kim RH; Cotter TM; Dunn MM; Patel ST; Spencer MJ; Wilson AS; Tager DS
    Spine J; 2010 Sep; 10(9):789-94. PubMed ID: 20619749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Ex vivo evaluation of ferromagnetism and artifacts of cardiac occluders exposed to a 1.5-T MR system.
    Shellock FG; Morisoli SM
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 1994; 4(2):213-5. PubMed ID: 8180463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Metallic artifact in MRI after removal of orthopedic implants.
    Bagheri MH; Hosseini MM; Emami MJ; Foroughi AA
    Eur J Radiol; 2012 Mar; 81(3):584-90. PubMed ID: 21146947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Metal artifact reduction in CT, a phantom study: subjective and objective evaluation of four commercial metal artifact reduction algorithms when used on three different orthopedic metal implants.
    Bolstad K; Flatabø S; Aadnevik D; Dalehaug I; Vetti N
    Acta Radiol; 2018 Sep; 59(9):1110-1118. PubMed ID: 29310445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. MR Imaging with Metal-suppression Sequences for Evaluation of Total Joint Arthroplasty.
    Talbot BS; Weinberg EP
    Radiographics; 2016; 36(1):209-25. PubMed ID: 26587889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Metallic residues as a source of artifacts in magnetic resonance imaging of the temporomandibular joint.
    Tetsumura A; Honda E; Sasaki T; Kino K
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1999 May; 28(3):186-90. PubMed ID: 10740475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Metal-induced artifacts in computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging: comparison of a biodegradable magnesium alloy versus titanium and stainless steel controls.
    Filli L; Luechinger R; Frauenfelder T; Beck S; Guggenberger R; Farshad-Amacker N; Andreisek G
    Skeletal Radiol; 2015 Jun; 44(6):849-56. PubMed ID: 25417003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluation of Metallic Artifacts Caused by Nonpenetrating Titanium Clips in Postoperative Neuroimaging.
    Ito K; Seguchi T; Nakamura T; Chiba A; Hasegawa T; Nagm A; Horiuchi T; Hongo K
    World Neurosurg; 2016 Dec; 96():16-22. PubMed ID: 27586178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.