These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7866844)

  • 21. Eddy-current-induced artifacts caused by an "MR-compatible" halo device.
    Malko JA; Hoffman JC; Jarrett PJ
    Radiology; 1989 Nov; 173(2):563-4. PubMed ID: 2798891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Comparison of CT imaging artifacts from craniomaxillofacial internal fixation devices.
    Fiala TG; Novelline RA; Yaremchuk MJ
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 1993 Dec; 92(7):1227-32. PubMed ID: 8248397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. MR imaging and metallic implants for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: assessment of ferromagnetism and artifact.
    Shellock FG; Mink JH; Curtin S; Friedman MJ
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 1992; 2(2):225-8. PubMed ID: 1562775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Quantification of susceptibility artifacts produced on high-field magnetic resonance images by various biomaterials used for neurosurgical implants. Technical note.
    Matsuura H; Inoue T; Konno H; Sasaki M; Ogasawara K; Ogawa A
    J Neurosurg; 2002 Dec; 97(6):1472-5. PubMed ID: 12507151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. [Rivet-like titanium clamps for refixation of bone covers after craniotomy--radiologic identification, safety and image quality in CT and MR studies].
    Lerch KD; Morgenstern F; Lau KT; Hoffmann G
    Rofo; 1998 Dec; 169(6):601-4. PubMed ID: 9930212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Internal fixation of the spine using a braided titanium cable: clinical results and postoperative magnetic resonance imaging.
    Doran SE; Papadopoulos SM; Miller LD
    Neurosurgery; 1996 Mar; 38(3):493-6; discussion 496-7. PubMed ID: 8837801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Magnetic resonance imaging in patients with dental implants: a clinical report.
    Devge C; Tjellström A; Nellström H
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1997; 12(3):354-9. PubMed ID: 9197100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. MR imaging of large nonferromagnetic metallic implants at 1.5 T.
    Augustiny N; von Schulthess GK; Meier D; Bösiger P
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 1987; 11(4):678-83. PubMed ID: 3597894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Spetzler titanium aneurysm clips: compatibility at MR imaging.
    Shellock FG; Shellock VJ
    Radiology; 1998 Mar; 206(3):838-41. PubMed ID: 9494511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Effects of surgical implants on high-field magnetic resonance images of the normal canine stifle.
    David FH; Grierson J; Lamb CR
    Vet Radiol Ultrasound; 2012; 53(3):280-8. PubMed ID: 22372640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Orthopedic spinal and hip prostheses: effects of magnetic susceptibility artifacts during MR arteriography and venography of abdomen and pelvis.
    Fidelman NA; Wilson MW; Bloom AI; Kerlan RK; LaBerge JM; Gordon RL
    Radiology; 2006 Sep; 240(3):894-9. PubMed ID: 16926332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Technical considerations: CT and MR imaging in the postoperative orthopedic patient.
    White LM; Buckwalter KA
    Semin Musculoskelet Radiol; 2002 Mar; 6(1):5-17. PubMed ID: 11917267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The orientation of orthopaedic metallic devices relative to the frequency-encoding gradient affects susceptibility artifacts: an experiment using open MR imaging.
    Takeuchi N; Mitsuyasu H; Nakanishi T; Nishimura S; Shimoto T; Higaki H; Hashizume M; Iwamoto Y
    Fukuoka Igaku Zasshi; 2011 May; 102(5):185-94. PubMed ID: 21761778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Titanium hip implants for improved magnetic resonance and computed tomography examinations.
    Ebraheim NA; Savolaine ER; Zeiss J; Jackson WT
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1992 Feb; (275):194-8. PubMed ID: 1735213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Metallic artifacts on MR images of the postoperative spine: reduction with fast spin-echo techniques.
    Tartaglino LM; Flanders AE; Vinitski S; Friedman DP
    Radiology; 1994 Feb; 190(2):565-9. PubMed ID: 8284417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Magnetic resonance imaging artifacts and the magnetic attachment system.
    Iimuro FT
    Dent Mater J; 1994 Jun; 13(1):76-88. PubMed ID: 7842644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Magnetic resonance imaging susceptibility artifacts in the cervical vertebrae and spinal cord related to monocortical screw-polymethylmethacrylate implants in canine cadavers.
    Jones BG; Fosgate GT; Green EM; Habing AM; Hettlich BF
    Am J Vet Res; 2017 Apr; 78(4):458-464. PubMed ID: 28346006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The value of magnetic resonance imaging of the postoperative spine with titanium implants.
    Rupp RE; Ebraheim NA; Wong FF
    J Spinal Disord; 1996 Aug; 9(4):342-6. PubMed ID: 8877964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Postimplantation MRI with cylindric and cubic intervertebral test implants: evaluation of implant shape, material, and volume in MRI artifacting--an in vitro study.
    Ernstberger T; Heidrich G; Buchhorn G
    Spine J; 2007; 7(3):353-9. PubMed ID: 17482121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Usefulness of a metal artifact reduction algorithm for orthopedic implants in abdominal CT: phantom and clinical study results.
    Jeong S; Kim SH; Hwang EJ; Shin CI; Han JK; Choi BI
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2015 Feb; 204(2):307-17. PubMed ID: 25615752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.