These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7866844)

  • 41. MR imaging evaluation of the spine with titanium alloy pedicular screw fixation.
    Iwasaku Y; Yamaguchi Y; Ohi N; Emoto K; Kusakabe T
    J Spinal Disord; 1995; 8 Suppl 1():S15-22. PubMed ID: 7787343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. In vitro magnetic resonance imaging evaluation of ossicular implants at 3 T.
    Shellock FG; Meepos LN; Stapleton MR; Valencerina S
    Otol Neurotol; 2012 Jul; 33(5):871-7. PubMed ID: 22643444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. The Effect of Susceptibility Artifacts Related to Metallic Implants on Adjacent-Lesion Assessment in Simultaneous TOF PET/MR.
    Svirydenka H; Delso G; De Galiza Barbosa F; Huellner M; Davison H; Fanti S; Veit-Haibach P; Ter Voert EEGW
    J Nucl Med; 2017 Jul; 58(7):1167-1173. PubMed ID: 28062597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Safety of intrauterine devices in MRI.
    Bussmann S; Luechinger R; Froehlich JM; von Weymarn C; Reischauer C; Koh DM; Gutzeit A
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(10):e0204220. PubMed ID: 30300364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. The effect of metallic implants on magnetic resonance imaging. A brief note.
    Ebraheim NA; Coombs RE; Jackson WT; Zeiss J
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1991 Oct; 73(9):1397-8. PubMed ID: 1918123
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Cranio-orbital reconstruction: safety and image quality of metallic implants on CT and MRI scanning.
    Sullivan PK; Smith JF; Rozzelle AA
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 1994 Oct; 94(5):589-96. PubMed ID: 7938281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Artifacts in spine magnetic resonance imaging due to different intervertebral test spacers: an in vitro evaluation of magnesium versus titanium and carbon-fiber-reinforced polymers as biomaterials.
    Ernstberger T; Buchhorn G; Heidrich G
    Neuroradiology; 2009 Aug; 51(8):525-9. PubMed ID: 19468722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. The interobserver-validated relevance of intervertebral spacer materials in MRI artifacting.
    Ernstberger T; Heidrich G; Bruening T; Krefft S; Buchhorn G; Klinger HM
    Eur Spine J; 2007 Feb; 16(2):179-85. PubMed ID: 16463200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Using SEMAC at 3 T MR to evaluate spinal metallic implants and peripheral soft tissue lesions.
    Xin C; Liu H; Li S; Lin G
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2020 Jun; 99(25):e20139. PubMed ID: 32569159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Impact of orthodontic appliances on the quality of craniofacial anatomical magnetic resonance imaging and real-time speech imaging.
    Wylezinska M; Pinkstone M; Hay N; Scott AD; Birch MJ; Miquel ME
    Eur J Orthod; 2015 Dec; 37(6):610-7. PubMed ID: 25667040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Assessment of MRI safety issues for stainless steel sutures used for microtia reconstruction.
    Kraai TL; Loch RB; Shellock FG
    J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2018 Oct; 71(10):1469-1475. PubMed ID: 30007538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Postoperative magnetic resonance imaging with titanium implants of the thoracic and lumbar spine.
    Ortiz O; Pait TG; McAllister P; Sauter K
    Neurosurgery; 1996 Apr; 38(4):741-5. PubMed ID: 8692394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Reduction of metal artefacts in musculoskeletal MR imaging.
    Vandevenne JE; Vanhoenacker FM; Parizel PM; Butts Pauly K; Lang RK
    JBR-BTR; 2007; 90(5):345-9. PubMed ID: 18085188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Magnetic resonance imaging artifact following acoustic neurofibroma surgery--case report.
    Sridhar K; Ramamurthi R; Vasudevan MC; Ramamurthi B
    Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo); 1999 Dec; 39(13):938-40. PubMed ID: 10658456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Ex vivo evaluation of ferromagnetism, heating, and artifacts of breast tissue expanders exposed to a 1.5-T MR system.
    Fagan LL; Shellock FG; Brenner RJ; Rothman B
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 1995; 5(5):614-6. PubMed ID: 8574049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Radio frequency versus susceptibility effects of small conductive implants--a systematic MRI study on aneurysm clips at 1.5 and 3 T.
    Lauer UA; Graf H; Berger A; Claussen CD; Schick F
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2005 May; 23(4):563-9. PubMed ID: 15919602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. [Artifacts in MRT caused by instruments and implants].
    Graf H; Lauer UA; Klemm T; Schnieder L; Schick F
    Z Med Phys; 2003; 13(3):165-70. PubMed ID: 14562538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Exploring metal artifact reduction using dual-energy CT with pre-metal and post-metal implant cadaver comparison: are implant specific protocols needed?
    Wellenberg RHH; Donders JCE; Kloen P; Beenen LFM; Kleipool RP; Maas M; Streekstra GJ
    Skeletal Radiol; 2018 Jun; 47(6):839-845. PubMed ID: 28842739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Aneurysm clips: evaluation of MR imaging artifacts at 1.5 T.
    Shellock FG; Kanal E
    Radiology; 1998 Nov; 209(2):563-6. PubMed ID: 9807590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. A new radiolucent system for vertebral body replacement: its stability in comparison to other systems.
    Claes L; Schultheiss M; Wolf S; Wilke HJ; Arand M; Kinzl L
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1999; 48(1):82-9. PubMed ID: 10029154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.